SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TDLs Part 1

Créé par: nintendofan721
Équipe: 2021-22 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 4 déc. 2021
Publié: 4 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Well, we’re at that point in the season where we have an accurate idea of who’s a playoff team and who’s not. I thought I’d share what I would do for each team at the trade deadline if I was GM. I’ll start with Anaheim since they’re first in alphabetical order so be patient Jets fans, I’ll get to you eventually. We all thought Anaheim was going to be near the bottom of the league, but they’ve been quite a surprise so far, and it looks like the rebuild may be done sooner than we thought. I’ll do sort of a mix of buying and selling. If they make the playoffs, they’ll have a solid built team that can try to go on a run, and if they don’t make it, they won’t completely mess up their future. Feel free to give feedback in the comments and let me know if you would do anything differently.
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Manson, Josh (2 050 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Anyone in need of a right defenseman. I’m keeping Lindholm and Rakell for a possible playoff run, but I’ll give away Manson for some picks. He can be worth a first especially if the ducks retain.
2.
ANA
  1. Miller, Colin
Détails additionnels:
A right defenseman to take Manson’s place for the playoffs. I think he would be a good fit.
BUF
  1. Larsson, Jacob
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
Conditional pick: if the ducks miss the playoffs this year, the pick will become a 2023 2nd.
3.
ANA
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Deslauriers, Nicolas
Détails additionnels:
Anyone in need of a bottom 6 forward for a low draft pick.
4.
MIN
  1. Comtois, Maxime
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
I’m getting the sense that Fiala might be on the outs from Minnesota due to contract negotiations. And Comtois is struggling with the ducks this season, so this can be a possible trade. The ducks have the cap space to get a deal with Fiala next year, and Comtois can get a chance to bounce back with a high scoring team. Assuming Comtois is healthy at TDL.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de NSH
Logo de EDM
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $65 024 583 $0 $3 282 500 $16 475 417 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 500 000 $$2M)
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 100 000 $5 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 875 000 $3 875 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
809 166 $809 166 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 déc. 2021 à 12 h 33
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 1,899
Mentions "j'aime": 1,239
The problem is that Minnesota has no urgency to trade Fiala. That is why we will only trade him if the package includes a top prospect or a top6 center.
BuFfaLOFaN et RazWild a aimé ceci.
4 déc. 2021 à 12 h 34
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,545
Mentions "j'aime": 7,343
if the leafs are going to spend that much on a pending UFA, it sure as heck wont be manson
4 déc. 2021 à 12 h 51
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 976
Mentions "j'aime": 244
I'm a huge fan of deslauriers ill take him on the wild for a 5th round pick
4 déc. 2021 à 12 h 57
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 2,385
Mentions "j'aime": 1,940
Wild won't accept that.
RazWild a aimé ceci.
4 déc. 2021 à 13 h 5
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 945
Mentions "j'aime": 475
Quoting: EccE
The problem is that Minnesota has no urgency to trade Fiala. That is why we will only trade him if the package includes a top prospect or a top6 center.


Quoting: TZ11
Wild won't accept that.


What would you throw in the package? I would have thought Fiala and Comtois would have close to the same value.
4 déc. 2021 à 13 h 6
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 1,907
Mentions "j'aime": 449
Minnesota isn't doing this! Fiala has way more value! They don't need to trade him either. Cap isn't an issue to keeping Fiala
4 déc. 2021 à 13 h 7
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 945
Mentions "j'aime": 475
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
if the leafs are going to spend that much on a pending UFA, it sure as heck wont be manson


Wasn’t targeting them specifically. I just went with them since they might need an RHD if they get rid of Holl.
4 déc. 2021 à 14 h 9
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 1,899
Mentions "j'aime": 1,239
Quoting: nintendofan721
What would you throw in the package? I would have thought Fiala and Comtois would have close to the same value.


The problem with Comtois is that
A. He is a winger, which we have no need of. If we had, we would just keep Fiala.
B. He has had one good year and is more of an unproven player than Fiala.

For Fiala, we would want a top6 C, a top prospect or a high 1st round pick.
nintendofan721 et RazWild a aimé ceci.
4 déc. 2021 à 17 h 53
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Like the offseason, I don't think the Ducks do much at the TDL. We are over-performing. Now is not the time to sell, nor is it the time to "go all-in". Maybe Des gets moved again (although I'd prefer holding onto him). I doubt Manson is moved. Maybe Rakell gets moved if the right deal comes in, but I think the chances are slim.
nintendofan721 a aimé ceci.
4 déc. 2021 à 21 h 55
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 14,984
Mentions "j'aime": 11,372
As a Ducks fan, I only like the Manson deal
5 déc. 2021 à 18 h 21
#11
Being wrong is ok
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 354
Why are we selling an RFA player that will fit perfectly in our rebuild and keeping Lindholm, a soon to be UFA? Do we resign him?

It doesn't matter if we get to the playoffs we are still in the rebuild. Too many UFAs this year. Losing Lindholm would suck. Losing him for nothing would bring me pain.

TDL Grade C+
nintendofan721 a aimé ceci.
7 déc. 2021 à 7 h 15
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: BuckoJoyde
Why are we selling an RFA player that will fit perfectly in our rebuild and keeping Lindholm, a soon to be UFA? Do we resign him?

It doesn't matter if we get to the playoffs we are still in the rebuild. Too many UFAs this year. Losing Lindholm would suck. Losing him for nothing would bring me pain.

TDL Grade C+


Because we have every intention of signing him maybe? You don't have to trade away every pending UFA, especially if you plan on re-signing them.
nintendofan721 et BuckoJoyde a aimé ceci.
10 déc. 2021 à 18 h 49
#13
Being wrong is ok
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 354
Quoting: mytduxfan
Because we have every intention of signing him maybe? You don't have to trade away every pending UFA, especially if you plan on re-signing them.


Intention would be a pretty weak reason to get hold off on trading him when that intention has probably been clear since the club could extend him. That said, what team/gm wouldnt have the intention on resigning a Lindholm? Waiting till the offseason to resign is awfully risky and would leave us with in a bit of dilemma if it didn't come to fruition like it has many other times in the NHL. We shall see tho. I hope he resigns. Id offer him an 8.5X8. That might not even do it if you consider state taxes and the free agent market. Nonetheless, I do agree with your point here I just dont think its applicable to Hampus Lindholm.
14 déc. 2021 à 6 h 25
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: BuckoJoyde
Intention would be a pretty weak reason to get hold off on trading him when that intention has probably been clear since the club could extend him. That said, what team/gm wouldnt have the intention on resigning a Lindholm? Waiting till the offseason to resign is awfully risky and would leave us with in a bit of dilemma if it didn't come to fruition like it has many other times in the NHL. We shall see tho. I hope he resigns. Id offer him an 8.5X8. That might not even do it if you consider state taxes and the free agent market. Nonetheless, I do agree with your point here I just dont think its applicable to Hampus Lindholm.


Yes, it is risky, but Lindholm hasn't expressed a desire to leave or even stated he'll test the market. If that is his plan, why not just say it is? It won't de-value any contract he'd get (open market and all) and would allow teams to prepare their finances to make a serious bid for him. He'd certainly be a prime target.

I imagine he is probably just being told to wait on re-signing with ANA. ANA (at least when GMBM was at the reigns) has traditionally driven a hard bargain when it comes to re-signs. His agent will have more leverage to get a better deal if Lindholm is literally days away from being a UFA, even if Lindholm has no intention of leaving.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage