SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Potentially

Créé par: Yash97
Équipe: 2021-22 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 3 déc. 2021
Publié: 3 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
2.
EDM
  1. Caufield, Cole
Détails additionnels:
this one is obviously a joke, dont roast me in the comments, but tell me if this is fair or not :)
MTL
  1. Holloway, Dylan
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
3.
4.
BOS
  1. Hakanpää, Jani
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2023
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $80 377 801 $669 339 $1 207 500 $1 122 199 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 175 000 $1 175 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 175 000 $1 175 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
834 167 $834 167 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 600 000 $5 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
785 000 $785 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $ (125 000 $$125K125 000 $$125K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 déc. 2021 à 12 h 19
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 2,435
Mentions "j'aime": 929
Koskinen + Turris will cost you more.
3 déc. 2021 à 12 h 20
#2
Save Mcdavid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,659
Mentions "j'aime": 1,108
Controversial statement but over the next 10 years Holloway>Caulfied.
pinksocks a aimé ceci.
3 déc. 2021 à 12 h 21
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 6,640
Mentions "j'aime": 2,513
I will take Holloway over Caufield any and every day of the week.
NucksnOilers et CD282 a aimé ceci.
3 déc. 2021 à 12 h 21
#4
Save Mcdavid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,659
Mentions "j'aime": 1,108
Quoting: Isles10
Koskinen + Turris will cost you more.


Honestly, I think changing the second to a first and its completely fair.


I wouldn't mind trading a late first for varmy he has been super solid.
Isles10 et Yash97 a aimé ceci.
3 déc. 2021 à 12 h 27
#5
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 789
Mentions "j'aime": 131
Quoting: Drshnuckels91
Honestly, I think changing the second to a first and its completely fair.


I wouldn't mind trading a late first for varmy he has been super solid.


Quoting: Copenhagen
I will take Holloway over Caufield any and every day of the week.


Quoting: Drshnuckels91
Honestly, I think changing the second to a first and its completely fair.


I wouldn't mind trading a late first for varmy he has been super solid.


Quoting: Copenhagen
I will take Holloway over Caufield any and every day of the week.


Quoting: Drshnuckels91
Controversial statement but over the next 10 years Holloway>Caulfied.


Quoting: Isles10
Koskinen + Turris will cost you more.


What do u guys think about the dallas boston 3-way
3 déc. 2021 à 12 h 34
#6
Bringer_Of_Snow
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 1,422
Mentions "j'aime": 670
1) I don't like the idea of Varlamov. Yes he was top 5 or whatever in Vezina voting last year, but his numbers are just slightly better than Mikkos, and he is playing behind one of the most defensively focused teams. I just don't see him as enough of an upgrade to warrant wasting draft capital on. Come the off-season and if the Oilers aren't able to find a young goalie to be our starter, then I would ok with circling back for Varlamov if he was still available. But for right now, he's not worth the cost and being tied to his contract for next season.

2) I would say the value is fair. Caufield has shown well in his first run with the team last year and Holloway hasn't had his shot yet, so adding a decent pick helps. But I would think both teams prefer their guy at this point.

3) Sucks to lose Samorukov and a pick for a rental, but thats a pretty easy yes for the Oilers. Klingberg being a righty complicates it a little, but I'd take that chance. Dallas would probably prefer the 1st + good prospect route if they were to move him though.

4) I guess I'd do that
3 déc. 2021 à 13 h 1
#7
Future GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,712
Mentions "j'aime": 434
Quoting: Copenhagen
I will take Holloway over Caufield any and every day of the week.


Quoting: Copenhagen
I will take Holloway over Caufield any and every day of the week.


Havent even seen Holloway play an NHL game cmon man
3 déc. 2021 à 13 h 6
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 6,640
Mentions "j'aime": 2,513
Quoting: FilthyMitts05
Havent even seen Holloway play an NHL game cmon man


Yah that is the same as all the good prospects.
Connor
Leon
Nurse
Broberg
Nuge
Puljujarvi
Bouchard



Ect
3 déc. 2021 à 13 h 23
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,771
Mentions "j'aime": 7,649
Quoting: Isles10
Koskinen + Turris will cost you more.


Quoting: Drshnuckels91
Honestly, I think changing the second to a first and its completely fair.


I wouldn't mind trading a late first for varmy he has been super solid.


Koskinen >>> Varlamov this year. Why would Edmonton add??
3 déc. 2021 à 13 h 28
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,771
Mentions "j'aime": 7,649
Quoting: Drshnuckels91
Controversial statement but over the next 10 years Holloway>Caulfied.

Not sure why that would be controversial? They played on the same team last year and Holloway was the better player. He had more points/GP until he got seriously injured (and played the last 4 games with that injury), he's younger, bigger, faster, plays center, dominant as faceoffs, plays a 2-way game (including killing penalties), etc. Literally the only thing Caufield is better at is scoring goals, and the Oilers have another prospect (Carter Savoie) who is just as good as Caufield is, so they don't need Caufield.

Holloway is more valuable than Caufield today. That shouldn't be controversial at all.
Copenhagen et NucksnOilers a aimé ceci.
3 déc. 2021 à 13 h 30
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,771
Mentions "j'aime": 7,649
Quoting: FilthyMitts05
Havent even seen Holloway play an NHL game cmon man

Holloway played on the same team as Caufield just last season. The comparison is easy. He's got more value. See post #10 above for a few of the reasons why.
Copenhagen a aimé ceci.
3 déc. 2021 à 13 h 34
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 6,640
Mentions "j'aime": 2,513
Quoting: CD282
Not sure why that would be controversial? They played on the same team last year and Holloway was the better player. He had more points/GP until he got seriously injured (and played the last 4 games with that injury), he's younger, bigger, faster, plays center, dominant as faceoffs, plays a 2-way game (including killing penalties), etc. Literally the only thing Caufield is better at is scoring goals, and the Oilers have another prospect (Carter Savoie) who is just as good as Caufield is, so they don't need Caufield.

Holloway is more valuable than Caufield today. That shouldn't be controversial at all.


Bingo
Correct on everything.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
3 déc. 2021 à 13 h 40
#13
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,074
Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
This year, Koshiken has been vastly superior than Varlamov. It's a CapFriendly thing...once a player gets a reputation for being bad, nothing can shake it.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
3 déc. 2021 à 13 h 44
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,771
Mentions "j'aime": 7,649
Quoting: Bringer_Of_Snow
1) I don't like the idea of Varlamov. Yes he was top 5 or whatever in Vezina voting last year, but his numbers are just slightly better than Mikkos, and he is playing behind one of the most defensively focused teams. I just don't see him as enough of an upgrade to warrant wasting draft capital on. Come the off-season and if the Oilers aren't able to find a young goalie to be our starter, then I would ok with circling back for Varlamov if he was still available. But for right now, he's not worth the cost and being tied to his contract for next season.

2) I would say the value is fair. Caufield has shown well in his first run with the team last year and Holloway hasn't had his shot yet, so adding a decent pick helps. But I would think both teams prefer their guy at this point.

3) Sucks to lose Samorukov and a pick for a rental, but thats a pretty easy yes for the Oilers. Klingberg being a righty complicates it a little, but I'd take that chance. Dallas would probably prefer the 1st + good prospect route if they were to move him though.

4) I guess I'd do that


1) Varlamov is having a terrible season and his numbers are nowhere near as good as Koskinen's. What numbers are you looking at?

2) Holloway and Caufield played together just last season and Holloway was the more valuable player. He had more points/GP until he got seriously injured (and played the last 4 games with that injury), he's younger, bigger, faster, plays center, dominant at faceoffs, plays a complete 2-way game (including killing penalties), etc. Literally the only thing Caufield is better at is scoring goals, and the Oilers have another prospect (Carter Savoie) who is just as good as Caufield is at scoring, so they don't need Caufield. Holloway >> Caufield.

3) Not sure why Edmonton would target an offensive RHD/ PP specialist rental? That doesn't make any sense to me. Pass.

4) Pass. DeBrusk's 5v5 scoring rates over the past 2.25 years are worse than Kassian's, and if he's not scoring he's hurting the team with poor effort, lack of back checking, etc. And he's a rental as nobody is going to give him his QO next summer.
palhal et Copenhagen a aimé ceci.
3 déc. 2021 à 13 h 46
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,771
Mentions "j'aime": 7,649
Quoting: palhal
This year, Koshiken has been vastly superior than Varlamov. It's a CapFriendly thing...once a player gets a reputation for being bad, nothing can shake it.


And vice versa. It's interesting how people think goalies like Price, Gibson and Korpisalo have a whole bunch of value on the trade market. None of these guys has been playing up to his cap hit for years and yet I still see trades for multiple 1sts, at least for the first two. Crazy.
palhal a aimé ceci.
3 déc. 2021 à 13 h 47
#16
True Reverse Retro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 4,616
Mentions "j'aime": 3,032
Dallas declines. Koekkoek & Kassian have nearly no value for the Stars, the 3rd is a 3rd, and Samurokov is AT LEAST 4th on the Stars depth chart for quite a while after Suter, Lindell, and Harley; 5th if Heiskanen ever moves back to the left side. Add into that guys like Grushnikov, Sjolund, and Holmes and LD is not a position Dallas needs help at.

Klingberg is starting at a roster player, prospect in a position of need, and high 2nd/low 1st Round Pick.
SlevinKalevra et EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
3 déc. 2021 à 15 h 23
#17
Bringer_Of_Snow
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 1,422
Mentions "j'aime": 670
Quoting: CD282
1) Varlamov is having a terrible season and his numbers are nowhere near as good as Koskinen's. What numbers are you looking at?

2) Holloway and Caufield played together just last season and Holloway was the more valuable player. He had more points/GP until he got seriously injured (and played the last 4 games with that injury), he's younger, bigger, faster, plays center, dominant at faceoffs, plays a complete 2-way game (including killing penalties), etc. Literally the only thing Caufield is better at is scoring goals, and the Oilers have another prospect (Carter Savoie) who is just as good as Caufield is at scoring, so they don't need Caufield. Holloway >> Caufield.

3) Not sure why Edmonton would target an offensive RHD/ PP specialist rental? That doesn't make any sense to me. Pass.

4) Pass. DeBrusk's 5v5 scoring rates over the past 2.25 years are worse than Kassian's, and if he's not scoring he's hurting the team with poor effort, lack of back checking, etc. And he's a rental as nobody is going to give him his QO next summer.


1) pretty much what I said. I was referring to seasons past. There’s no denying Varlamov has been good the last several seasons. This year he hasn’t. Which I part of the reason I don’t want him.

2) i mean I agree I like Holloway more than Caufield, but MTL fans would prefer their guy. Before this season, it would be a tighter call than it is now that Caufield has struggled.

3) I do agree there isn’t room for him and typically I’d be against moving any assets to make a move for a position of strength before we address other needs, but Klingberg is a damn good player and that’s a pretty small price to pay. Samorukov is a tough loss, but it would depend on how he plays if he gets a shot before the TDL

4) indifferent. 2nd round pick isn’t a ridiculous price for a 3rd line guy. But like the Klingberg deal, not really a necessary move. Would rather address LHD at the TDL then Goaltending in the off-season
CD282 a aimé ceci.
3 déc. 2021 à 16 h 33
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,282
Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
Offer for Klinger is missing a first round pick and then some
EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
4 déc. 2021 à 4 h 9
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 2,435
Mentions "j'aime": 929
Quoting: CD282
Koskinen >>> Varlamov this year. Why would Edmonton add??


Because Varlamov’s played 5 (!) games this year ffs. Last year he was a top-5 goalie.
4 déc. 2021 à 15 h 10
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,771
Mentions "j'aime": 7,649
Quoting: Isles10
Because Varlamov’s played 5 (!) games this year ffs. Last year he was a top-5 goalie.

Because he was playing behind a top-5 defense, perhaps? And why hasn't he played more than 5 games? Because he's struggling? Not someone you'd want to trade for then.
4 déc. 2021 à 15 h 37
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 2,435
Mentions "j'aime": 929
Quoting: CD282
Because he was playing behind a top-5 defense, perhaps? And why hasn't he played more than 5 games? Because he's struggling? Not someone you'd want to trade for then.


It’s clear you’re trying to push a narrative here. Pelech - Pulock was as elite as you can be, but for the defense as whole, Varlamov in particular saved the defense more times than not. He’s been injured.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage