SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

My guys

Créé par: Prison_Goalie_Rick
Équipe: 2022-23 Blue Jackets de Columbus
Date de création initiale: 30 nov. 2021
Publié: 1 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Sillinger is going to be a really good NHL center, but not elite. Petterson is/can be elite. Laine is an elite scorer, but doesn’t play center, so his value is less the Pete’s. Woo has the potential to be a really good RHD, but not as high of a ceiling as Sillinger and also doesn’t play center. I think this trade balances out and is worth the risk to finally acquire an elite 1C that this franchise has never had.

Seattle needs some more offensively talented guys on the wing, but don’t want to marry themselves to term. Enter Gus Nyquist with one year at 4m. I think a year of Gus is worth about a 3rd, but some salary retention is affordable for one year and could get that pick upgraded to a 2nd.

Liam Foudy still has potential to be a good bottom-6 forward. Minnesota will need some cheaper players to make the most of their limited cap space after the Parise and Suter buyouts. They also can gain some cap room by moving Talbot on the last year of his deal. They can roll with Kappo in net, or sign a cheaper veteran.

Bemstrom has shown some serious flashes, but he is getting squeezed out of the lineup by Marchenko and Chinakov. Stenlund is big and smart, can play center or wing, and is decent depth player. Both guys seem destined for Europe if they can’t find some playing time in the NHL. Arizona is rebuilding and going to be trying to acquire some good young players with potential. Bemstrom is worth about a 3rd, Stenlund gets thrown in for the opportunity to compete for a spot on an NHL roster, and he boosts the value just enough to get a 2nd. This feels like a good trade for the pick to be conditional.




A Marchenko-Johnson-Chinakov line could be extremely offensively potent, and being the 3rd line can be shielded a bit and given 70-75% offensive zone starts.

Boone moves back to the wing, but centers the PP1 and PK2 to win face offs.

Folio Forsberg has been a man crush of mine since he was drafted. I wanted CBJ to take him No.2 overall instead of Murray. He always plays really well against the Jackets, which reminds me of how Panarin would always light it up against NYR, because he admired the team/organization and wanted to impress them. I know this is a stretch, but maybe he’d sign if CBJ ponied up the AAV and term. The deal would take him to age 34, but would be getting some of his best years.

The thought behind signing Russell is, he loved Columbus and Columbus loved him. Lots of guys who played in Columbus retire there, and this seems like a good fit. Also, he’s the all time shot blocker, and hopefully his mentality can rub off on Peeke. After the season he can retire and join the organization as a player development coach.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
2925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
42 650 000 $
2950 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2900 000 $
89 000 000 $
2900 000 $
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
78 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
CBJ
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (WPG)
SEA
  1. Nyquist, Gustav (1 500 000 $ retained)
3.
CBJ
  1. Talbot, Cam
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (MIN)
MIN
  1. Foudy, Liam
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2023 (CBJ)
4.
CBJ
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (FLA)
Détails additionnels:
2024 2nd is conditional on Bemstrom and Stenlund playing in a combined 100 games in the 2023-24 season. If condition is not met, the pick becomes the lower of Arizona’s 2024 3rd rounders.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de MIN
Logo de TBL
Logo de CBJ
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
2023
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de WPG
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
2024
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de FLA
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $75 762 500 $0 $700 000 $5 737 500 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 8
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance700 000 $$700K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 525 000 $1 525 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 583 333 $9 583 333 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 333 333 $2 333 333 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
787 500 $787 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
G
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 déc. 2021 à 20 h 56
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,306
Mentions "j'aime": 3,373
I'm not sure I would give up a 2nd for Foudy, let alone on top of our starting goaltender.
1 déc. 2021 à 20 h 56
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,870
Mentions "j'aime": 6,382
The only way the Canucks trade Pettersson to Columbus is if Kent Johnson is part of the package the other way
1 déc. 2021 à 20 h 57
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 3,179
Mentions "j'aime": 1,068
That's a better offer value wise than most others I've seen, but the Canucks still decline. We already have Boeser as a right handed sniper so Laine wouldn't be in a position to be maximized fully here.

Werenski one for one probably doesn't work for either team.
1 déc. 2021 à 21 h 5
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 1,907
Mentions "j'aime": 449
So Minnesota gives up their starting G, much less a 2nd round pick for bottom line player Minnesota doesn't need when they have cheaper players in AHL. Minnesota says no. No, they aren't giving up their starting Good G to sign more expensive, worse one
1 déc. 2021 à 21 h 9
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 2,400
Mentions "j'aime": 866
All this is really not necessary.
Yes, the biggest problem CBJ has is down the middle.
They should keep Laine long term.
They need a bona fide scorer.
Keep Sillinger. He will be very solid 1/2 center.
Just remember how good Dubois was?
Keep in mind they sent Dubois back to Juniors his 1st year after being drafted. Then the year after that Dubois made the team and thrived in the NHL. Granted he did have Panarin for a couple years. But…
Next year Johnson will probably make the team out of camp. Another true center. They also may get a top tier draft pick from either their own or Chicago’s pick in 2022.
That will leave Sillinger, Jenner, Johnson and Kuraly/Roslovic down the middle.
Trade Foudy (he was overhyped by Torts).
Don’t resign Hofmann unless he improves to warrant it.

Top wingers in 2022…Laine, Voracek, Bjorkstrand and Domi/Nyquist.
Bottom wingers…Chinakhov, Marchenko, Robinson & Bemstrom.
1 déc. 2021 à 21 h 22
#6
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,556
Mentions "j'aime": 12,310
What do Jackets fans think Domi is worth?
1 déc. 2021 à 21 h 28
#7
Démarrer sujet
A-toad-a-so
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 605
Mentions "j'aime": 275
Quoting: CAPDumba
So Minnesota gives up their starting G, much less a 2nd round pick for bottom line player Minnesota doesn't need when they have cheaper players in AHL. Minnesota says no. No, they aren't giving up their starting Good G to sign more expensive, worse one


It’s not like Talbot is something stellar. .914 career Sv%. Not bad, but not impressive. Many netminders have done just as well behind that defense. Talbot isn’t special, and he’s money that could be moved out.

Who said anything about signing a more expensive option? Read the description. It’s a move to save them money.
1 déc. 2021 à 21 h 35
#8
Démarrer sujet
A-toad-a-so
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 605
Mentions "j'aime": 275
Modifié 1 déc. 2021 à 22 h 51
Quoting: Bluejackets2000
All this is really not necessary.
Yes, the biggest problem CBJ has is down the middle.
They should keep Laine long term.
They need a bona fide scorer.
Keep Sillinger. He will be very solid 1/2 center.
Just remember how good Dubois was?
Keep in mind they sent Dubois back to Juniors his 1st year after being drafted. Then the year after that Dubois made the team and thrived in the NHL. Granted he did have Panarin for a couple years. But…
Next year Johnson will probably make the team out of camp. Another true center. They also may get a top tier draft pick from either their own or Chicago’s pick in 2022.
That will leave Sillinger, Jenner, Johnson and Kuraly/Roslovic down the middle.
Trade Foudy (he was overhyped by Torts).
Don’t resign Hofmann unless he improves to warrant it.

Top wingers in 2022…Laine, Voracek, Bjorkstrand and Domi/Nyquist.
Bottom wingers…Chinakhov, Marchenko, Robinson & Bemstrom.


Yeah, if we still had Dubois we wouldn’t need a 1C, but he’s gone. Sillinger ain’t Dubois. He is 5’10, 200lbs. His dads 5’10”, his brother is 5’10”, his grandpa is 5’10”. Dubois was a man child. Nothing against Sillinger, he’ll be a fine player, but he ain’t Dubois.

You gotta give to get. Laine is an elite scorer, we all know, but he is not a complete player by any stretch of the imagination. His value as an elite scorer is what it will take to land a 1C.

Johnson looks great! On the wing. I hope he’s our 1C too, but right now his ability to play center in the NHL is a complete unknown, and plenty of scouts think he’s a better wing already.
1 déc. 2021 à 22 h 2
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 2,400
Mentions "j'aime": 866
Quoting: pwisch17
Yeah, if we still had Dubois we would need to a 1C, but he’s gone. Sillinger ain’t Dubois. He is 5’10, 200lbs. His dads 5’10”, his brother is 5’10”, his grandpa is 5’10”. Dubois was a man child. Nothing against Sillinger, he’ll be a fine player, but he ain’t Dubois.

You gotta give to get. Laine is an elite scorer, we all know, but he is not a complete player by any stretch of the imagination. His value as an elite scorer is what it will take to land a 1C.

Johnson looks great! One the wing. I hope he’s our 1C too, but right now his ability to play center in the NHL is a complete unknown, and plenty of scouts think he’s a better wing already.


Ok, trade Laine and package including Marchenko or Bemstrom, but need to keep Sillinger. His maturity and compete level are what will set him apart, not his height.

I was thinking there was no way that the Jackets could land Shane Wright with the Chicago pick in 2022, since the condition is that if Chicago win either of the 2 lottery draws, they can keep the pick. Well, if Chicago finishes last in NHL (not likely, but possible), and doesn’t win either of the drawings (and the top pick drawing goes to a team below 10th, then the Jackets would land that top pick from Chicago and take Shane Wright.

Game changer. I think that would definitely lead to Bowman’s firing. And a new era in Columbus.
1 déc. 2021 à 22 h 22
#10
Hockey Fan13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,914
Mentions "j'aime": 2,487
Wallstedt will definitely have to be killing it for the Wild to consider this.
Wild would also need to be convinced Foudy could stick at center, even then though they may feel that Wild have better, cheaper in house options.
Prison_Goalie_Rick a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2021 à 22 h 36
#11
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,361
Mentions "j'aime": 4,177
Quoting: Bluejackets2000
Ok, trade Laine and package including Marchenko or Bemstrom, but need to keep Sillinger. His maturity and compete level are what will set him apart, not his height.

I was thinking there was no way that the Jackets could land Shane Wright with the Chicago pick in 2022, since the condition is that if Chicago win either of the 2 lottery draws, they can keep the pick. Well, if Chicago finishes last in NHL (not likely, but possible), and doesn’t win either of the drawings (and the top pick drawing goes to a team below 10th, then the Jackets would land that top pick from Chicago and take Shane Wright.

Game changer. I think that would definitely lead to Bowman’s firing. And a new era in Columbus.


We’ve already gone over this - Capfriendly’s terms are incorrect. CHI keeps the pick if it is top two, straight up. https://www.nhl.com/news/seth-jones-traded-to-blackhawks-by-blue-jackets/c-325758614

Sillinger is listed at 6’0. And he’s 18. He’s going to grow a bit. Regardless, he’s not being moved - the team is immensely high on his potential.

I think VAN would be foolish to sell low on EP right now, and CBJ likely aren’t going to make a splash move without seeing what the draft holds - if CHI ends up with a Top 10 pick, I imagine they’ll be happy rolling the dice with what they have, particularly if their pick is in a similar range.

Foudy doesn’t have that much trade value on his own - he’s likely a sweetener add on to another trade. Bemstrom is likely the same, and Stenlund has little value - he’s gone through waivers twice now, and no team has claimed him.

I think the only trade of these that could happen is the Nyquist trade - even then, CBJ would have to retain the full 50%, most likely; but, I’d be down for that.
Prison_Goalie_Rick a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2021 à 22 h 42
#12
Démarrer sujet
A-toad-a-so
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 605
Mentions "j'aime": 275
Quoting: Bluejackets2000
Ok, trade Laine and package including Marchenko or Bemstrom, but need to keep Sillinger. His maturity and compete level are what will set him apart, not his height.

I was thinking there was no way that the Jackets could land Shane Wright with the Chicago pick in 2022, since the condition is that if Chicago win either of the 2 lottery draws, they can keep the pick. Well, if Chicago finishes last in NHL (not likely, but possible), and doesn’t win either of the drawings (and the top pick drawing goes to a team below 10th, then the Jackets would land that top pick from Chicago and take Shane Wright.

Game changer. I think that would definitely lead to Bowman’s firing. And a new era in Columbus.


That’s an insane scenario to rely on as a counter argument. Also, it’s impossible as dopplsan pointed out. Also Bowman is already gone. Did you miss the whole sexual abuse cover up?
1 déc. 2021 à 22 h 43
#13
Démarrer sujet
A-toad-a-so
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 605
Mentions "j'aime": 275
Quoting: dopplsan
We’ve already gone over this - Capfriendly’s terms are incorrect. CHI keeps the pick if it is top two, straight up. https://www.nhl.com/news/seth-jones-traded-to-blackhawks-by-blue-jackets/c-325758614

Sillinger is listed at 6’0. And he’s 18. He’s going to grow a bit. Regardless, he’s not being moved - the team is immensely high on his potential.

I think VAN would be foolish to sell low on EP right now, and CBJ likely aren’t going to make a splash move without seeing what the draft holds - if CHI ends up with a Top 10 pick, I imagine they’ll be happy rolling the dice with what they have, particularly if their pick is in a similar range.

Foudy doesn’t have that much trade value on his own - he’s likely a sweetener add on to another trade. Bemstrom is likely the same, and Stenlund has little value - he’s gone through waivers twice now, and no team has claimed him.

I think the only trade of these that could happen is the Nyquist trade - even then, CBJ would have to retain the full 50%, most likely; but, I’d be down for that.


He’s listed as 6’0” but he’s shorter than everyone he stands nexts to. I think that’s a bit generous. And given his lineage, it is a much safer bet that he’s not getting taller. Height is not everything, and I’m high on him too, but he’s not Petterson. Elite center talent is needed to compete for cups. Sillinger isn’t going to be elite.
1 déc. 2021 à 22 h 48
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 1,907
Mentions "j'aime": 449
Quoting: pwisch17
It’s not like Talbot is something stellar. .914 career Sv%. Not bad, but not impressive. Many netminders have done just as well behind that defense. Talbot isn’t special, and he’s money that could be moved out. Many netminder? Please tell me who? Dubnyk, he literally wasn't goid. Who else? No one

Who said anything about signing a more expensive option? Read the description. It’s a move to save them money.


He may not be anything special, but he wins game fir Minnesota. Minnesota doesn't need to move out their cheap #1G to save money. If you watch Talbot,, you would actually know he's good. Save percentage isn't all rhe story. So no chance Minnesota is moving their #1G and 2nd round pick for a bottom line guy
2 déc. 2021 à 11 h 52
#15
Démarrer sujet
A-toad-a-so
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 605
Mentions "j'aime": 275
Quoting: CAPDumba
He may not be anything special, but he wins game fir Minnesota. Minnesota doesn't need to move out their cheap #1G to save money. If you watch Talbot,, you would actually know he's good. Save percentage isn't all rhe story. So no chance Minnesota is moving their #1G and 2nd round pick for a bottom line guy


So has Dubnyk, Kuemper, Stalock… they can sign an average NHL goaltender for less than 3.6m, and they will need to in order to extend guys and pay Parise and Suter to play against them.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage