SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Debrusk

Équipe: 2021-22 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 1 déc. 2021
Publié: 1 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
CGY
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Haula, Erik
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
BOS
  1. Monahan, Sean (975 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $74 064 166 $0 $15 000 $7 435 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 375 000 $2 375 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
801 666 $801 666 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 déc. 2021 à 12 h 22
#1
No longer a Virgin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 6,009
Mentions "j'aime": 2,602
Bruins accept, they'll have to dump Moore somewhere but that's worth it
1 déc. 2021 à 12 h 25
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 503
Mentions "j'aime": 120
Bruins absolutely do that. Idk about the Flames though
1 déc. 2021 à 12 h 25
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,914
Mentions "j'aime": 19,293
Calgary is not the team addong here lol
buffdaddy a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2021 à 12 h 27
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
monahan>>>debrusk
1 déc. 2021 à 14 h 2
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Calgary is not the team addong here lol


Obviously, totally agree here. Do you think there’s any reasonable scenario with a Debrusk+ for Monahan?
1 déc. 2021 à 16 h 5
#6
aeroastro.MN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,105
Mentions "j'aime": 419
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Obviously, totally agree here. Do you think there’s any reasonable scenario with a Debrusk+ for Monahan?

I d say DeBrusk + 1st + Moore for Monahan and conditional 3rd at the tdl
1 déc. 2021 à 16 h 18
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Aero_Astro_Guy
I d say DeBrusk + 1st + Moore for Monahan and conditional 3rd at the tdl


PLEASE, there should be NO 1st rounders involved in this proposal
hanson493 a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2021 à 16 h 20
#8
aeroastro.MN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,105
Mentions "j'aime": 419
Quoting: Knuckl3s
PLEASE, there should be NO 1st rounders involved in this proposal


Quoting: Knuckl3s
PLEASE, there should be NO 1st rounders involved in this proposal

I m taking back salary
1 déc. 2021 à 16 h 23
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Aero_Astro_Guy
I m taking back salary


Even so
1 déc. 2021 à 16 h 24
#10
aeroastro.MN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,105
Mentions "j'aime": 419
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Even so


Still. Calgary needs a 2C not less than Boston. The need in a winger is debatable though. But I get your point here. The price for Monahan is likely a second rounder plus a b prospect. How much DeBrusk costs is another story.
1 déc. 2021 à 16 h 40
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,914
Mentions "j'aime": 19,293
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Obviously, totally agree here. Do you think there’s any reasonable scenario with a Debrusk+ for Monahan?


No because Calgary would not consider qualifying DeBrusk next year as they really dont want or need LWs and are more in need of a top 6 center.

Even if its not optimal for the team betting on Monahan to bounce back to form is way more beneficial than blocking someone like Pelletier who arguably could be on the main roster now
1 déc. 2021 à 16 h 47
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,617
Mentions "j'aime": 2,763
very risky. Boston has actually been fine in the 2c department. Coyle is playing at a .61ppg pace right now. thats not terrible for 2nd line. actually pretty good. the problem is outside of top the line hall and coyle NOBODY else is picking up any scoring slack. and the defense isnt good enough to win 1-0 every night.
1 déc. 2021 à 17 h 4
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
No because Calgary would not consider qualifying DeBrusk next year as they really dont want or need LWs and are more in need of a top 6 center.

Even if its not optimal for the team betting on Monahan to bounce back to form is way more beneficial than blocking someone like Pelletier who arguably could be on the main roster now


The thing that doesn’t make sense to me there, is there is certainly a scenario where both debrusk and monohan kinda continue their crappy pace, and being able to not qualify debrusk, and just walk away would be preferable to having monohan at his deal for another year.
1 déc. 2021 à 17 h 5
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Aero_Astro_Guy
I d say DeBrusk + 1st + Moore for Monahan and conditional 3rd at the tdl


First seems a bit steep given Monahan’s troubles the last few years.
Aero_Astro_Guy a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2021 à 20 h 15
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 1,047
Mentions "j'aime": 325
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Obviously, totally agree here. Do you think there’s any reasonable scenario with a Debrusk+ for Monahan?


Quoting: CMcAvoy73
The thing that doesn’t make sense to me there, is there is certainly a scenario where both debrusk and monohan kinda continue their crappy pace, and being able to not qualify debrusk, and just walk away would be preferable to having monohan at his deal for another year.


There is no reasonable scenario for Debrusk + for Monahan. Monahan is playing no better than DeBrusk right now, maybe worse, and that's saying something. You want to lock in at 6M + for next year? Not me.
1 déc. 2021 à 20 h 25
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: BruinsCharlies
There is no reasonable scenario for Debrusk + for Monahan. Monahan is playing no better than DeBrusk right now, maybe worse, and that's saying something. You want to lock in at 6M + for next year? Not me.


I can see acquiring monahan, having a change of scenery/culture change/coaching change lead to him getting back to a 2C. I’m not seeing many other ways the bruins can get that.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage