SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kane to PIT

Créé par: gpmack95
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 1 déc. 2021
Publié: 1 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
SJS
  1. Blomqvist, Joel [Liste de réserve]
  2. Matheson, Michael
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
PIT
  1. Kane, Evander (3 500 000 $ retained)
  2. Simek, Radim
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $70 445 000 $0 $377 500 $11 055 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
500 000 $500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 833 $850 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
783 333 $783 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 déc. 2021 à 9 h 45
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
I don't think SJ needs anymore LHDs.
1 déc. 2021 à 9 h 48
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 6,310
Mentions "j'aime": 2,226
SJ says no, they wont retain on KAne and Matheson is not a big enough upgrade than Simek, (let alone that 4.8mil contract for 5 yrs on a team with bad bloated and long defensive contracts) and they gve up a 3rd and get Blomqvist, who is at best a high-ish midlevel prospect?

No chance. (the buy out is less than the retention anyways)

Take out matheson and blomqvist and simek and and offer a 1st and zucker for kane and 3.5 retention is probably closer
1 déc. 2021 à 10 h 0
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 6,392
Mentions "j'aime": 789
Quoting: Hammerwise
SJ says no, they wont retain on KAne and Matheson is not a big enough upgrade than Simek, (let alone that 4.8mil contract for 5 yrs on a team with bad bloated and long defensive contracts) and they gve up a 3rd and get Blomqvist, who is at best a high-ish midlevel prospect?

No chance. (the buy out is less than the retention anyways)

Take out matheson and blomqvist and simek and and offer a 1st and zucker for kane and 3.5 retention is probably closer


Haha the 1st would be coming from SJS.
1 déc. 2021 à 10 h 12
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
Quoting: Hammerwise
SJ says no, they wont retain on KAne and Matheson is not a big enough upgrade than Simek, (let alone that 4.8mil contract for 5 yrs on a team with bad bloated and long defensive contracts) and they gve up a 3rd and get Blomqvist, who is at best a high-ish midlevel prospect?

No chance. (the buy out is less than the retention anyways)

Take out matheson and blomqvist and simek and and offer a 1st and zucker for kane and 3.5 retention is probably closer


If this was Kane from 5 years ago or Patrick Kane then yes I’d agree. But Evander Kane at 3.5 million is a cap dump. He’s a dbag and he’s got 1 foot out the door of the league. Players don’t like playing with him cause he is a jerkoff. No team will take him even at 3.5 million without sweeteners.
1 déc. 2021 à 10 h 37
#5
Retired V2 V3 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 3,583
Mentions "j'aime": 1,127
Quoting: Hammerwise
SJ says no, they wont retain on KAne and Matheson is not a big enough upgrade than Simek, (let alone that 4.8mil contract for 5 yrs on a team with bad bloated and long defensive contracts) and they gve up a 3rd and get Blomqvist, who is at best a high-ish midlevel prospect?

No chance. (the buy out is less than the retention anyways)

Take out matheson and blomqvist and simek and and offer a 1st and zucker for kane and 3.5 retention is probably closer


Lol not a chance. Don't forget Evander has negative value right now. Especially with that cap dump. SJ should take what they can get for him and move on, simple!
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage