SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trade Deadline

Créé par: xercuses
Équipe: 2021-22 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 30 nov. 2021
Publié: 30 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Hertl, Tomas (2 800 000 $ retained)
  2. Kane, Evander (3 500 000 $ retained)
  3. Labanc, Kevin
SJS
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Lysell, Fabian
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
2.
BOS
    Part of first trade but this is for cap space
    SJS
    1. Moore, John
    2. Nosek, Tomas
    3. Wagner, Chris
    4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
    5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (BOS)
    3.
    BOS
    1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (ANA)
    Détails additionnels:
    Team that needs depth at trade deadline
    4.
    ARI
    1. Clifton, Connor
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    2023
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    2024
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de BOS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $75 219 370 $1 956 507 $125 000 $6 280 630 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
    AG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
    C
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
    AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 825 000 $2 825 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    -1 391 304 $-1 391 304 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    2 375 000 $2 375 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    C, AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    750 000 $750 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    725 000 $725 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    725 000 $725 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance125 000 $$125K)
    G
    RFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    30 nov. 2021 à 14 h 34
    #1
    Temple of Ferraro
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2021
    Messages: 637
    Mentions "j'aime": 335
    Sharks trade isn’t horrible, nice to see Lysell finally included in a trade for Hertl. I just don’t think Sharks would like to send Hertl to the same team as Kane, just common courtesy thing.
    CheechYou, areax91 et xercuses a aimé ceci.
    30 nov. 2021 à 14 h 35
    #2
    train, train
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 2,996
    Mentions "j'aime": 730
    One dynamic to look at here is that Hertl and Kane won't want to be traded to the same team. That's part of the situation now -- Sharks have to choose one of them, and if they choose to bring back Kane (they won't), that means the end of Hertl in teal. They both have NTC's so it's controlled by them too.
    OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    30 nov. 2021 à 14 h 36
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 595
    Mentions "j'aime": 230
    Torn on this one honestly. On one hand, I appreciate the two 1st rounds plus a top prospect in Lysell, all of which would be lovely for the Sharks to have. On the other, the Sharks are better suited to trade Labanc to a team with issues in wing (thinking Seattle or Ottawa are better fits for him), and retaining Hertl on top of Kane would mean a hefty sum of dead cap for this season.

    I for one will cautiously accept this trade, but I can see why other Sharks fans on CapFriendly may decline.
    Bias_it_self, xercuses et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    30 nov. 2021 à 14 h 39
    #4
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 14,017
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
    Quoting: Bias_it_self
    Sharks trade isn’t horrible, nice to see Lysell finally included in a trade for Hertl. I just don’t think Sharks would like to send Hertl to the same team as Kane, just common courtesy thing.


    It is horrible for boston.
    30 nov. 2021 à 14 h 40
    #5
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 14,017
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
    So lets get this straight….
    Bruins take a cancer in Kane….negative value.
    They take a very overpaid labanc…negative value.
    Because they just took on all that cap, they can’t re-sign hertl, so the one good thing they get is a rental.

    They give up debrusk, their best prospect, and two picks in the process.

    That right there is a franchise destroyer.
    30 nov. 2021 à 14 h 50
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Xercuses
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 13,309
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,548
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    So lets get this straight….
    Bruins take a cancer in Kane….negative value.
    They take a very overpaid labanc…negative value.
    Because they just took on all that cap, they can’t re-sign hertl, so the one good thing they get is a rental.

    They give up debrusk, their best prospect, and two picks in the process.

    That right there is a franchise destroyer.


    Kane may be a **** but he’s damn good
    Labanc isn’t overpaid imo
    Hertl is amazing
    But if you rather not have a Stanley cup you do you
    FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
    30 nov. 2021 à 14 h 57
    #7
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 14,017
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
    Quoting: xercuses
    Kane may be a **** but he’s damn good
    Labanc isn’t overpaid imo
    Hertl is amazing
    But if you rather not have a Stanley cup you do you


    Do you think Debrusk is overpaid?

    WIth these trades, the Bruins are not likely to win the stanley cup. Then they’re likely to be bad for a long time. I think it would be worse than the Thornton trade.
    30 nov. 2021 à 14 h 59
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 8,025
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,568
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    So lets get this straight….
    Bruins take a cancer in Kane….negative value.
    They take a very overpaid labanc…negative value.
    Because they just took on all that cap, they can’t re-sign hertl, so the one good thing they get is a rental.

    They give up debrusk, their best prospect, and two picks in the process.

    That right there is a franchise destroyer.


    Imagine thinking labanc has negative value
    FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
    30 nov. 2021 à 15 h 1
    #9
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 14,017
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
    Quoting: glarson17
    Imagine thinking labanc has negative value


    Imagine having paid attention to his play the 2+ seasons. 4.725 should get you a lot more than that.
    30 nov. 2021 à 15 h 4
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 8,025
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,568
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    Imagine having paid attention to his play the 2+ seasons. 4.725 should get you a lot more than that.


    Scoring a .49 ppg over the last two shortened seasons while being on the 3rd or 4th line is pretty good production for player with bad players on a bad team.
    30 nov. 2021 à 15 h 12
    #11
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 14,017
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
    Quoting: glarson17
    Scoring a .49 ppg over the last two shortened seasons while being on the 3rd or 4th line is pretty good production for player with bad players on a bad team.


    And 4.725 should get you more.
    30 nov. 2021 à 15 h 29
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 8,025
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,568
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    And 4.725 should get you more.


    The way money gets thrown around in the league today that’s not bad at all
    gary_bettman a aimé ceci.
    30 nov. 2021 à 15 h 29
    #13
    IamAlwaysRight
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 2,681
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
    Hertl and Kane do not like each other. Therefore it would never happen
    30 nov. 2021 à 15 h 30
    #14
    IamAlwaysRight
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 2,681
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    And 4.725 should get you more.


    Orly? Many worse players than Labanc make more that 5 lol
    30 nov. 2021 à 15 h 42
    #15
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 14,017
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    Orly? Many worse players than Labanc make more that 5 lol


    And guess what they are? Say it with me: negative value.
    30 nov. 2021 à 16 h 43
    #16
    IamAlwaysRight
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 2,681
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    And guess what they are? Say it with me: negative value.


    And my point was that your comment was moot. And it still is.
    FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
    30 nov. 2021 à 18 h 0
    #17
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 14,017
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    And my point was that your comment was moot. And it still is.


    How? Negative value is negative value. No ones trading for Karlsson either.
    1 déc. 2021 à 7 h 57
    #18
    IamAlwaysRight
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 2,681
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    How? Negative value is negative value. No ones trading for Karlsson either.


    What does Karlsson have to do with? You're just trying to antagonize now.
    1 déc. 2021 à 8 h 43
    #19
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 14,017
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    What does Karlsson have to do with? You're just trying to antagonize now.


    Okay, sub in coyle, or forbort, or ullmark. I just wanted to use an example i knew you would be familiar with.

    No one is trading for those guys. Negative value is negative value.
    1 déc. 2021 à 9 h 26
    #20
    IamAlwaysRight
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 2,681
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    Okay, sub in coyle, or forbort, or ullmark. I just wanted to use an example i knew you would be familiar with.

    No one is trading for those guys. Negative value is negative value.


    But this was about Labanc. Now your comments have negative value.
    1 déc. 2021 à 9 h 57
    #21
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 14,017
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    But this was about Labanc. Now your comments have negative value.


    My comments have always been about negative value. Because labanc has negative value. See, the whole negative value concept comes from this thing called bad contracts. Labanc has a bad contract. Bene?
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage