SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lets Do It

Créé par: Acegamer
Équipe: 2021-22 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 29 nov. 2021
Publié: 29 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
BOS
  1. Henrique, Adam (1 825 000 $ retained)
  2. Lindholm, Hampus
ANA
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de CGY
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $73 019 702 $1 956 507 $125 000 $8 480 298 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
-368 750 $-368 750 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 375 000 $2 375 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
AG, C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance125 000 $$125K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 nov. 2021 à 19 h 53
#1
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,403
Mentions "j'aime": 2,894
Nope. Lindholm can get a better return than that with out eating bad contracts.
Acegamer et TZ11 a aimé ceci.
29 nov. 2021 à 19 h 56
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,259
Mentions "j'aime": 140
Quoting: Jah1722
Nope. Lindholm can get a better return than that with out eating bad contracts.


I’ll take out studnicka and add Lysell. Lol
29 nov. 2021 à 19 h 59
#3
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,403
Mentions "j'aime": 2,894
Quoting: l19f9
I’ll take out studnicka and add Lysell. Lol


Still doesn’t work.
29 nov. 2021 à 20 h 9
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 14,987
Mentions "j'aime": 11,373
Pass
29 nov. 2021 à 20 h 29
#5
Leafs suck
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,561
Mentions "j'aime": 894
Anaheim is in a playoff push, they’re not trading lindholm
29 nov. 2021 à 20 h 35
#6
Dekesaladekes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,823
Mentions "j'aime": 1,025
Quoting: Jah1722
Nope. Lindholm can get a better return than that with out eating bad contracts.


the only contract you are really eating is moores for what 1.5 years?
stud has 2c potential and debrusk with the opportunites he will more likely be handed in anaheim has the chance of rebounding as he will get more 5v5 time and PP time
reilly would be your 2nd best LHD behind fowler, every advanced analytic shows that reilly is a huge positive when on the ice, bruins have been scoring at a relatively low rate which explains his low point total.
maybe make it a 2022 1st that will be around 22-32

lindholm is a UFA and henrique would almost need to be retained to be moved anywhere his point totals don't actually tell his actual on ice affect. terry has been carrying that line and getzlaf has just been a really good playmaker on that line replace henrique with zegras, lundstrom, comtois, milano, rakell and you would probably see the exact same production or better from them
if he wasn't retained you would most likely not get stud or the 1st
29 nov. 2021 à 20 h 49
#7
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,403
Mentions "j'aime": 2,894
Quoting: Dekes
the only contract you are really eating is moores for what 1.5 years?
stud has 2c potential and debrusk with the opportunites he will more likely be handed in anaheim has the chance of rebounding as he will get more 5v5 time and PP time
reilly would be your 2nd best LHD behind fowler, every advanced analytic shows that reilly is a huge positive when on the ice, bruins have been scoring at a relatively low rate which explains his low point total.
maybe make it a 2022 1st that will be around 22-32

lindholm is a UFA and henrique would almost need to be retained to be moved anywhere his point totals don't actually tell his actual on ice affect. terry has been carrying that line and getzlaf has just been a really good playmaker on that line replace henrique with zegras, lundstrom, comtois, milano, rakell and you would probably see the exact same production or better from them
if he wasn't retained you would most likely not get stud or the 1st


So you make excuses for Debrusk being bad but then go on to claims Henrique is bad while actually producing. The mental gymnastics sure are something.

Nothing in this offer is really that appealing. Studnicka has 2C upside but can’t stick as a 22 year old? No thanks. A future 1st? Pass. A failing 3rd liner? Pass. A 3rd pairing D? Pass. A depth D making more than 1.5M? Pass. Lindholm will get a top prospect and a 1st if he’s moved.
BruinsCharlies a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage