SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

A Somewhat Reasonable Deadline Day

Créé par: areax91
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 26 nov. 2021
Publié: 29 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Kravtsov, Vitali
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (NYR)
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
TBL
  1. Nieto, Matt
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
3.
SJS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
4.
SJS
  1. Lyubushkin, Ilya
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (ARI)
ARI
  1. Simek, Radim
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
5.
SJS
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
Détails additionnels:
I found this from a Bruins AGM, and this trade makes sense for both parties. I think DeBrusk can regain his confidence and cement himself in a 2nd Line, while Kane's playstyle would be a fit in Boston while also having the locker room to handle him.
BOS
  1. Kane, Evander (3 500 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de CHI
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de NYR
Logo de SJS
Logo de TBL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $65 587 500 $0 $460 000 $15 912 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
500 000 $500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 833 $850 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
783 333 $783 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG
RFA - 5

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 nov. 2021 à 14 h 5
#1
Be Constructive
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 838
Mentions "j'aime": 110
For Kravstov, don't ask a 3rd, it's not sure NYR say yes for Labanc alone
Bonino doesn't have this value
I don't get why a trade Simek for a UFA Dman, I guess its financial but it's so small I don't think SJS just give Simek
Idk what to say about any Kane trade, seems like the guy will be boughtout for me but I guess hockey wise it makes sense
29 nov. 2021 à 14 h 26
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,629
Mentions "j'aime": 1,515
Locker room to handle Kane....LOL. Good luck with that.
29 nov. 2021 à 14 h 31
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,017
Mentions "j'aime": 3,565
Quoting: Korax
For Kravstov, don't ask a 3rd, it's not sure NYR say yes for Labanc alone
Bonino doesn't have this value
I don't get why a trade Simek for a UFA Dman, I guess its financial but it's so small I don't think SJS just give Simek
Idk what to say about any Kane trade, seems like the guy will be boughtout for me but I guess hockey wise it makes sense


Sharks want to move away from Simeks contract, they would do this in a heartbeat. They’ve been trying to move him for nearly a year.
29 nov. 2021 à 14 h 43
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 595
Mentions "j'aime": 230
Quoting: delneggs
Locker room to handle Kane....LOL. Good luck with that.


Boston has Bergeron, Pastrnak, and Foligno on their team. I can't see any of those guys putting up with Kane breaking dress code, being late to practice, or faking vaccine cards, and they are probably the best mentors Kane could have to avoid future issues.
29 nov. 2021 à 14 h 43
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,565
Mentions "j'aime": 5,450
No interest in Kane and "while Kane's playstyle would be a fit in Boston", what does that even mean?
29 nov. 2021 à 14 h 49
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 595
Mentions "j'aime": 230
Quoting: bhavikp27
No interest in Kane and "while Kane's playstyle would be a fit in Boston", what does that even mean?


Kane is a power forward who crashes nets, finishes passes, and plays extensively on the forecheck. He is also a physical forward who will not hesitate to drop the gloves. Boston has a reputation for their traditionally physical play and aggressive approach to games (hence their "Big Bad Bruins" label), and Kane could easily play a similar role to Boston-era Lucic if he joins their team.
29 nov. 2021 à 15 h 20
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,496
Mentions "j'aime": 4,562
Quoting: areax91
Kane is a power forward who crashes nets, finishes passes, and plays extensively on the forecheck. He is also a physical forward who will not hesitate to drop the gloves. Boston has a reputation for their traditionally physical play and aggressive approach to games (hence their "Big Bad Bruins" label), and Kane could easily play a similar role to Boston-era Lucic if he joins their team.


I've seen enough of Kane running around playing against the Bruins and then hiding. Same guy that tried to jump Chara in a fight. No use for him and want him no where near this team.
29 nov. 2021 à 15 h 37
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,629
Mentions "j'aime": 1,515
Quoting: areax91
Boston has Bergeron, Pastrnak, and Foligno on their team. I can't see any of those guys putting up with Kane breaking dress code, being late to practice, or faking vaccine cards, and they are probably the best mentors Kane could have to avoid future issues.


No disrespect meant to Boston at all, but I think Kane is beyond being "mentored". He has a compulsive gambling issue that no one in any locker room can help him with and he has also shown he has no character at all and only thinks of himself, not the team. I would be shocked if a well run organization like Boston brought him in.
bhavikp27 a aimé ceci.
29 nov. 2021 à 15 h 41
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,565
Mentions "j'aime": 5,450
Quoting: areax91
Kane is a power forward who crashes nets, finishes passes, and plays extensively on the forecheck. He is also a physical forward who will not hesitate to drop the gloves. Boston has a reputation for their traditionally physical play and aggressive approach to games (hence their "Big Bad Bruins" label), and Kane could easily play a similar role to Boston-era Lucic if he joins their team.


This is over. That was pre-2015. The Bruins in the Cassidy era are more about pace, energy and skill than physicality and toughness/grit. Game has changed now. They're able to step up physically when needed though. If you want to associate them with something, it's more about defense. If the player isn't responsible defensively, they won't play him.

Anyways, I don't see them being interested by Kane due to his off-ice issues and the term on his contract is too long.

Try Vancouver. It could be an option and Benning is obviously making one last bad move before getting fired.
29 nov. 2021 à 15 h 47
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,282
Mentions "j'aime": 2,731
Kane is a bad person. A different locker room won’t change that. Play style? Lol
29 nov. 2021 à 16 h 9
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,832
Mentions "j'aime": 905
Rangers decline. We cannot fit in Labanc's cap hit.
Bloodykisame a aimé ceci.
29 nov. 2021 à 16 h 42
#12
Next Gen
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,334
Mentions "j'aime": 269
Quoting: hero9154
Rangers decline. We cannot fit in Labanc's cap hit.


not to mention lablanc is a solid middle 6 krav has more value alone. We will see where he is at at the end of the KHL season but we expect a much better player back with kravtsov is in play.
29 nov. 2021 à 17 h 57
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 1,047
Mentions "j'aime": 325
Quoting: glarson17
Sharks want to move away from Simeks contract, they would do this in a heartbeat. They’ve been trying to move him for nearly a year.


So since about 6 months after he signed that 4 year contract in March 2020. Why did they ever do that deal? Don Sweeney would be proud and that's not good.
29 nov. 2021 à 18 h 21
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,017
Mentions "j'aime": 3,565
Quoting: BruinsCharlies
So since about 6 months after he signed that 4 year contract in March 2020. Why did they ever do that deal? Don Sweeney would be proud and that's not good.


He was a solid D man until he tore up his knee and he hasn’t been the same since. Not sure why they signed him to that long of term.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage