SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

My GM retool on the fly

Créé par: myteam
Équipe: 2021-22 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 28 nov. 2021
Publié: 28 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Over performing players EROD and DH are traded before they regress,
Rust to COL for Bowers/ TJ and bc a second is fair value, maybe a little overpayment
JZ for KANE at 50 percent retention is a gamble, but one I think will pay off
Isles trade is only to help them w a cheap LD
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
2.
PIT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
3.
PIT
  1. Bowers, Shane
  2. Jost, Tyson
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (COL)
4.
PIT
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (NYI)
5.
PIT
  1. Kane, Evander (3 500 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de NYI
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de TBL
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de COL
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $71 011 902 $0 $1 050 000 $10 488 098 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
-1 391 304 $-1 391 304 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 636 364 $2 636 364 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 725 000 $1 725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 nov. 2021 à 23 h 22
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 6,591
Mentions "j'aime": 2,480
Modifié 29 nov. 2021 à 7 h 58
Yeah TB has to send ABB DOWN when Kucherov and Point come back just to have $712cap space they pass and keep their 3. besides TB IS REALLY GOOD WITH 2-5 ROUND PICKS
myteam a aimé ceci.
28 nov. 2021 à 23 h 24
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 435
Mentions "j'aime": 183
Modifié 28 nov. 2021 à 23 h 32. Raison: Forgot to add - not worth the long term assets for them to make this deal
I would say drop Bowers or the 2nd and value is there from a COL perspective. But they can't afford to resign him. The Avs have all kinds of capspace next yr, but it all disappears the year after. Rather keep Kadri and Nuke. Thats all the Avs can afford long term. They need to pick up expiring contracts and 1yr deals. Then Lock down 29.
myteam a aimé ceci.
28 nov. 2021 à 23 h 24
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
I’m no way shape or form should we take on Evander Kane. Especially not for that salary and especially not if we give up anything in the process.
myteam a aimé ceci.
29 nov. 2021 à 10 h 30
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2015
Messages: 420
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
Yeah TB has to send ABB DOWN when Kucherov and Point come back just to have $712cap space they pass and keep their 3. besides TB IS REALLY GOOD WITH 2-5 ROUND PICKS

No worries. It was a move made with the fact that TAMPA has little cap, and could help a little. Could easily deal to different team
Boltsbeathabs a aimé ceci.
29 nov. 2021 à 10 h 31
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2015
Messages: 420
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: LittleBuddha
I would say drop Bowers or the 2nd and value is there from a COL perspective. But they can't afford to resign him. The Avs have all kinds of capspace next yr, but it all disappears the year after. Rather keep Kadri and Nuke. Thats all the Avs can afford long term. They need to pick up expiring contracts and 1yr deals. Then Lock down 29.


How about Bowers & Jost?
Or Bowers & 2nd?
Or Bowers & Barron?
29 nov. 2021 à 10 h 33
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2015
Messages: 420
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: Pensfan89
I’m no way shape or form should we take on Evander Kane. Especially not for that salary and especially not if we give up anything in the process.


Risk vs reward.
At this stage, I’ll take the risk. Otherwise, I’d stay away, but too little time left, too many bad deals.
29 nov. 2021 à 10 h 41
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 435
Mentions "j'aime": 183
Quoting: myteam
How about Bowers & Jost?
Or Bowers & 2nd?
Or Bowers & Barron?


OK, OK, Nope.
29 nov. 2021 à 10 h 44
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 6,591
Mentions "j'aime": 2,480
Quoting: myteam
No worries. It was a move made with the fact that TAMPA has little cap, and could help a little. Could easily deal to different team


Wasn't being nasty just TB really has no space at all and getting a bottom 6 or anyone means they definitely loose off current roster and I really do not see them going that route.
29 nov. 2021 à 12 h 15
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
Quoting: myteam
Risk vs reward.
At this stage, I’ll take the risk. Otherwise, I’d stay away, but too little time left, too many bad deals.


So your logic is that we should make another horrible deal because we’ve recently made too many bad deals? Not sure about that logic there. It isn’t risk vs reward. You’re trading the better player and teammate for a locker room cancer who is close to being out of the league. It’s bad management.
30 nov. 2021 à 0 h 56
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2015
Messages: 420
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: Pensfan89
So your logic is that we should make another horrible deal because we’ve recently made too many bad deals? Not sure about that logic there. It isn’t risk vs reward. You’re trading the better player and teammate for a locker room cancer who is close to being out of the league. It’s bad management.


My logic is:
Kane is the higher skilled player.
Kane plays a more physical game.
Kane scores more.
Kane gets more helpers.

Kane finds himself in the penalty box too often.
Takes too many off ice risks.
R wants to be star
30 nov. 2021 à 1 h 48
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
Quoting: myteam
My logic is:
Kane is the higher skilled player.
Kane plays a more physical game.
Kane scores more.
Kane gets more helpers.

Kane finds himself in the penalty box too often.
Takes too many off ice risks.
R wants to be star


So again, your logic is to trade a guaranteed middle 6 winger for a guy that’s got 1 foot out the door of the league cause he is a dbag. E. Kane “wanting to be a star” is the least of his stupidity. He is a cancer and you don’t bring that into a locker room like the pens. Especially considering his contract. Anything more and league minimum is too much.
30 nov. 2021 à 4 h 44
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,453
Mentions "j'aime": 4,525
Bowers and a second is as much as you get. You don't get Jost as well.

Quoting: myteam
How about Bowers & Jost?
Or Bowers & 2nd?
Or Bowers & Barron?


You definitely don't get Barron.
myteam a aimé ceci.
30 nov. 2021 à 21 h 57
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2015
Messages: 420
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: TJTwolf
Bowers and a second is as much as you get. You don't get Jost as well.

Honestly, that imo is pretty fair, spot on value. It’s not what I exactly want, and it’s probably more than COL wants to give. So that tells me it’s probably spot on.
Unless Rust is injured, or goes on a scoring rampage.

You definitely don't get Barron.
30 nov. 2021 à 22 h 2
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2015
Messages: 420
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: Pensfan89
So again, your logic is to trade a guaranteed middle 6 winger for a guy that’s got 1 foot out the door of the league cause he is a dbag. E. Kane “wanting to be a star” is the least of his stupidity. He is a cancer and you don’t bring that into a locker room like the pens. Especially considering his contract. Anything more and league minimum is too much.


You are spot on. But at heart most people care about Championships.
Truly, Kane sucks as a person, but can play hockey. And as long as he is pretty good at it, he will be in the league.

Even though, I think the sharks should be able to terminate the contract. And Kane should be barred from the league by the commissioner. Anything short of that, fans will forgive anything for championships, and that is where we are. 😢
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage