SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

for better or for worse

Créé par: Wqrrior
Équipe: 2022-23 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 22 nov. 2021
Publié: 22 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2775 000 $
2755 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
45 950 000 $
35 500 000 $
21 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
31 600 000 $
12 500 000 $
33 100 000 $
43 875 000 $
Transactions
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2023
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2024
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $80 382 500 $25 000 $3 775 000 $2 117 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Islanders de New York
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
908 333 $908 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
3 875 000 $3 875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
G
UFA - 5
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
755 000 $755 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 nov. 2021 à 21 h 5
#1
Islanders Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 7,817
Mentions "j'aime": 2,754
Don't think Isles do it. Cheaper alternatives out there
22 nov. 2021 à 21 h 6
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 194
Mentions "j'aime": 91
Isles say yes but idk if the avs do, beau along with the team has been struggling so he's at the lowest his value will be. avs would prolly want more unless he gets going again but I don't see that happening bc we suck rn
22 nov. 2021 à 21 h 13
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 39,590
Mentions "j'aime": 18,152
Looks fair to me
22 nov. 2021 à 21 h 15
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 14,999
Mentions "j'aime": 12,084
Isles decline
22 nov. 2021 à 21 h 24
#5
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
I kinda dig it in terms of player level, but Girard's term is so much better.
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
22 nov. 2021 à 21 h 47
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 3,623
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
i think this makes a lot of sense as far as what the framework would be, i just don't think the islanders are in a position to give up young, skilled forwards at this point
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
22 nov. 2021 à 21 h 49
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,522
Mentions "j'aime": 3,370
On the surface, the trade looks pretty fair. However, Colorado's defense looks way worse without Girard, and they end up letting Burakovsky and Nichushkin just walk here. This doesn't seem to be the best approach to the off season (imo). It's like picking fruit from the top of the tree when the low hangers taste just as good and are easier to get.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
22 nov. 2021 à 22 h 5
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,914
Mentions "j'aime": 19,292
Quoting: Anus_McLeod
On the surface, the trade looks pretty fair. However, Colorado's defense looks way worse without Girard, and they end up letting Burakovsky and Nichushkin just walk here. This doesn't seem to be the best approach to the off season (imo). It's like picking fruit from the top of the tree when the low hangers taste just as good and are easier to get.


I agree that letting Burakovsky and Nuke walk is a mistake but I disagree about their defense being weak, especially when you factor in how poor Girard played last post-season and their lack abundance for offensive dmen. Maybe don't sign Rakell to play a 3rd line shutdown roll, and don't overpay Edler either. To me this seems like a move that really benefits both sides.
NMAvsFan a aimé ceci.
22 nov. 2021 à 22 h 27
#9
Representing the 505
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,444
Mentions "j'aime": 3,630
This is a tough one because the Avs need secondary scoring and Beauvillier is a strong two-way guy. But Girard's term is a lot better so maybe the Isles would need to add a little. Hypothetically, they could plug Barron into the D corps so there is at least that option. Some of the other deals - Schultz, Edler, Rackell - are wasteful. Better off finding a way to keeping Nuke and Bura. So I guess I like the trade but am not a fan of most of the signings.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
22 nov. 2021 à 22 h 35
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,522
Mentions "j'aime": 3,370
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I agree that letting Burakovsky and Nuke walk is a mistake but I disagree about their defense being weak, especially when you factor in how poor Girard played last post-season and their lack abundance for offensive dmen. Maybe don't sign Rakell to play a 3rd line shutdown roll, and don't overpay Edler either. To me this seems like a move that really benefits both sides.


He had a rough series against Vegas, but he was hardly the only one. One series doesn't define the guy. He's a great player and very valuable to Colorado. I do understand you need to give to get, and I'm a big fan of Beauvillier, but I really think the Avs would be shooting themselves in the foot to do this before Barron is ready to go. That said, I can absolutely see how some may disagree with me here. It's not an easy no for me. I do think I'm a no though.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
22 nov. 2021 à 22 h 43
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,914
Mentions "j'aime": 19,292
Quoting: Anus_McLeod
He had a rough series against Vegas, but he was hardly the only one. One series doesn't define the guy. He's a great player and very valuable to Colorado. I do understand you need to give to get, and I'm a big fan of Beauvillier, but I really think the Avs would be shooting themselves in the foot to do this before Barron is ready to go. That said, I can absolutely see how some may disagree with me here. It's not an easy no for me. I do think I'm a no though.


I see your POV but I just think Byram makes him way more expendable. Adding a player like Beauvillier wpulx really round out the top 6 who has seemed to lack depth at points
Anus_McLeod, NMAvsFan et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage