Here is what I think:
Eakin: a 6th or 7th round pick
Hinnostraza: a 4th round pick
Miller: a 2nd and a 4th round pick, or a prospect and a 3rd or 4th round pick (at most)
Butcher: a 4th or 5th round pick
Hagg: a 5th round pick
Anderson: a 4th round pick

For Georgiev, I'm not a Rangers fan, but around a 2nd or 1rst round pick in value.

Georgiev is literally awful, id trade a 7th

he's a bridge goalie until Luukonen is ready imo, but I hear ya

These feel about right, except for Miller and Georgiev.

I think Miller gets a little more than that. A 2nd a C-level prospect feels about right for him. IMO

Georgiev gets a 3rd or 4th at most.

That said, our interest level in Hinostroza is non-existent. He's not what we'd be looking for or have any need of.

Not even close for Georgiev. Rangers want to dump him because he sucks. They'd probably move him for a 5th.

Agree with most of these, georgiev doesnt get anything near that imo

The leafs send a 7th to never be involved in another miller trade

Eakin: 6th
Hinostroza: 3rd (EDM fans say they would trade him for that, from what I've seen)
Miller: 2nd or a prospect and pick
Butcher: 7th
Hagg: (conditional 4th that turns into a 3rd)
Anderson: 5th

Georgiev: 5th

Eakin (50% retained): 5th or 6th rounder, some teams may cough up a 4th if they are desperate for a centre
Hinostroza: 3rd rounder, maybe an addition 7th or something
Miller (50% retained): 2nd rounder or 3rd rounder and 5th rounder
Butcher: no value, even if we retained 50% we may only get a 7th
Hagg: 3rd rounder
Anderson: 4th rounder
Georgiev: no interest in him but probably a 3rd and low level prospect or AHL player

Would Vanacek be a more worthy substitute, even if it cost much more?

i guess

Eakin, Cody ($1,100,000 retained), I'd give a late pick, maybe a fourth due to retainment if I'm from a team without much cap space.

Hinostroza, Vinnie, roughly the same as Eakin, but a bit more likely to get a fourth.

Miller, Colin ($1,800,000 retained), he has been a good defender for Buffalo. Having a bit of a defensive slump this year, but a big improvement on offense. Also seems to be a decent 2PP guy. I'd give up a second if I got a fourth back. Or even it out and call it a middling prospect or a third.

Butcher, Will, Down lately, but he was once a pretty decent defensive defenseman. I'd definitely give up a second if he improves between now and the TDL.

Anderson, Craig, Can't think of my teams are in such a need of a back-up goalie that Craig Anderson would be better than what they already have. Maybe a 7th.

Why would you want him

You have to be more specific there is a couple guys on this list that fit the bill of "why would you want him?"

Georgiev, hes not good. Theres no reason to pay for what they already have

I was just looking at goalies on the market. It truthfully could be any goalie on the open market. The reason I want to acquire a goalie is because I am not confident in Dell or Tokarski for the rest of the year, and I think Anderson will be moved.