SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TDL if sharks decide to retool

Créé par: glarson17
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 22 nov. 2021
Publié: 22 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This is if the team is not contending, which I expect them to not be, and Doug Wilson tries to acquire assets.

It will be too costly to move Kane at this moment, so just keep him this season. Maybe in the off-season he can be moved for a more reasonable price or bought out etc.

I would like them to move on from Simek but they’ve tried to move him for a year now and it hasn’t happened.
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Kravtsov, Vitali
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (NYR)
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TBL)
TBL
  1. Nieto, Matt
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (NYR)
3.
SJS
  1. Barron, Justin
  2. Olausson, Oskar
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (COL)
COL
  1. Hertl, Tomas (2 600 000 $ retained)
4.
SJS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (FLA)
FLA
  1. Cogliano, Andrew (250 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de TBL
Logo de SJS
Logo de FLA
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2581 500 000 $62 696 196 $0 $1 522 500 $18 803 804 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
783 333 $783 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 833 $850 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
RFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 nov. 2021 à 16 h 25
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 4,360
Mentions "j'aime": 2,231
Quoting: glarson17
I would see the sharks asking for a 1st and Schneider at least in a trade for Hertl.


I mean, it's what the Rangers seem to need most. They do not have center depth... I believe if the Rangers are in a top 3 spot by the deadline, ownership has them make the splash.
22 nov. 2021 à 17 h 57
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,380
Mentions "j'aime": 9,025
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Honestly I see the sharks moving Hertl for less to a team that cannot resign him as a rental then resigning him this offseason.
we can then use the pieces we got for his rental to improve our depth and rebuild!


Except that 3 team trade to clause is going to make that very difficult. What if Hertl submits his 3 team list and it is VGK, TBL and COL? VGK and TBL don’t have assets or cap space, does that put SJS in a position to potentially lose him for nothing in the off season or accept a Jost 1st rd pick centric offer that is low?
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
22 nov. 2021 à 18 h 15
#28
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,195
Mentions "j'aime": 4,657
Quoting: Xqb15a
Except that 3 team trade to clause is going to make that very difficult. What if Hertl submits his 3 team list and it is VGK, TBL and COL? VGK and TBL don’t have assets or cap space, does that put SJS in a position to potentially lose him for nothing in the off season or accept a Jost 1st rd pick centric offer that is low?


Hertl would be open to more if the deal works for everyone.
22 nov. 2021 à 19 h 7
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 399
Mentions "j'aime": 126
Quoting: mhroblak
There’s no way the Rangers can afford Labanc’s contract long term. Especially if they believed they couldn’t afford a long term Pavel Buchnevich contract.


Yeah but that's true of every "name player" that's thrown around to fill the RW hole. At least Labanc will have 2 years left at a reasonable cap hit?
22 nov. 2021 à 20 h 1
#30
MGITBPITNHL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,507
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: OldSenileGuy
Yeah but that's true of every "name player" that's thrown around to fill the RW hole. At least Labanc will have 2 years left at a reasonable cap hit?


That's why every name player you see thrown around on this site won't be the long term RW option for the Rangers.
Also disagree that Labanc's cap hit is reasonable. He's a little overpaid to me.
22 nov. 2021 à 20 h 3
#31
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,133
Mentions "j'aime": 3,625
Quoting: mhroblak
That's why every name player you see thrown around on this site won't be the long term RW option for the Rangers.
Also disagree that Labanc's cap hit is reasonable. He's a little overpaid to me.


Quoting: mhroblak
That's why every name player you see thrown around on this site won't be the long term RW option for the Rangers.
Also disagree that Labanc's cap hit is reasonable. He's a little overpaid to me.


If you put him in your top 6, he would be a 50 point player. $4.7 mil for a 50 point guys isn’t bad especially with the contracts that get handed out now.
22 nov. 2021 à 20 h 9
#32
MGITBPITNHL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,507
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: glarson17
If you put him in your top 6, he would be a 50 point player. $4.7 mil for a 50 point guys isn’t bad especially with the contracts that get handed out now.


His career high is 56 and I really don't know if he'll return to that level with better teammates.
22 nov. 2021 à 20 h 11
#33
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,133
Mentions "j'aime": 3,625
Quoting: mhroblak
His career high is 56 and I really don't know if he'll return to that level with better teammates.


He scored 40 in 17-18 and 56 in 18-19. Put him with offensive players and he will produce.
Masonh618 a aimé ceci.
22 nov. 2021 à 20 h 15
#34
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,133
Mentions "j'aime": 3,625
Quoting: glarson17
He scored 40 in 17-18 and 56 in 18-19. Put him with offensive players and he will produce.


Quoting: mhroblak
His career high is 56 and I really don't know if he'll return to that level with better teammates.


Changed the comment after lol

The last two seasons he has averaged .47 ppg and .51 ppg on very bad sharks teams while playing up and down the lineup. He absolutely can produce more with better teammates.
22 nov. 2021 à 22 h 8
#35
MGITBPITNHL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,507
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: glarson17
Changed the comment after lol

The last two seasons he has averaged .47 ppg and .51 ppg on very bad sharks teams while playing up and down the lineup. He absolutely can produce more with better teammates.


I didn’t change it after reading your reply. I realized I misread the stats about a minute after submitting. My apologies for that error. That said, I’m still skeptical about this. It seems like a pretty high risk move for my Rangers, even though it could definitely work.
23 nov. 2021 à 22 h 7
#36
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,552
Mentions "j'aime": 4,570
Too much for a rental in Hertl. Not getting our top two prospects and a first.
23 nov. 2021 à 22 h 16
#37
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,133
Mentions "j'aime": 3,625
Quoting: TJTwolf
Too much for a rental in Hertl. Not getting our top two prospects and a first.


Those aren’t your top two prospects
23 nov. 2021 à 22 h 18
#38
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,552
Mentions "j'aime": 4,570
Quoting: glarson17
Those aren’t your top two prospects


Of those outside the NHL they are.
23 nov. 2021 à 22 h 19
#39
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,133
Mentions "j'aime": 3,625
Quoting: TJTwolf
Of those outside the NHL they are.


Okay well 19 and 20 yo guys are still prospects
23 nov. 2021 à 22 h 33
#40
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,552
Mentions "j'aime": 4,570
Quoting: glarson17
Okay well 19 and 20 yo guys are still prospects


True-ish, but only two are arguably higher than those two and neither of those should be prospects by the end of the year. Can't really consider them 'graduated' as yet (although Byram would probably be close if he hadn't been injured) but I tend to only really consider prospects as non-roster players aside from short term call ups. Byram is, or would be a bona fide roster player but for injury. Newhook may well be by the end of the season and as it stands is a roster player. As Byram is pretty much untouchable, and both he and Newhook would be out of the conversation in such a deal I pretty much figured people would understand what I meant by top two prospects but there we go......explained it for you.
27 nov. 2021 à 17 h 44
#41
AvsCOL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 140
Mentions "j'aime": 19
That Colorado trade is ludicrous. Basically three first round picks for a rental. Eichel didn't even get that.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage