Quoting: Canucks33
The prospects you listed are good, but they're not on the level necessary to convince Vancouver to give up their Captain. Whatever you place Horvat's value at for his on ice performance, add an extra 50% since he is our captain, leader and organizational face. You will not land him without moving out a quality, top-tier piece from your organization. Schneider + 1st wouldn't be enough for me for Horvat.
I'm personally not too sure how highly I'd rate Newhook, but I'll go off his recognition around the league as a top tier prospect. He would be a great piece for a trade; I would be interested in Byram too but his injuries are concerning. As for this deal specifically, if you can find a way to keep Kadri and replace him with something else of value, it would be very, very tough to pass up.
If you're going on Newhook's recognition, Kravtsov moves the needle just as much. The nice thing about the players I'm specifying, is that if the "eighth year" of the "rebuild" is as it looks the youth can be served substantially.
Adding a playmaker like Henriksson to Hoglander, takes a considerable amount of pressure off a top-line Petterson-Boeser. They also make the cap implications for further hits of Garland easier to handle.
One thing I'm concerned with, is OEL's decline kicking in, too soon. It's going to hurt and will potentially block Rathbone's NHL development. He (Rathbone) is (for example) better than Greczlyk, and might prove to be more valuable. My point is: if Benning (or another GM) is going to need to lose the battle to win the war (cap vs roster), is to lose his captain and save his current and future cap. Kravtsov is versatile, and can play both wings, which can offer the option of moving forward from guys like JT Miller and Tanner Pearson, should the Canucks so desire.
I understand your concern with "bang for your buck" in a potential swap. Considering that the cap implications are what they are, including a need to re-sign Boeser, it might be in the best interest of ownership and front office, to consider a trade that is about future more than present.