SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Mrazek to Oil

Créé par: Faulk_my_Dzingel
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 20 nov. 2021
Publié: 20 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Not looking to get ragged on. Looking for thoughts on this. Just an idea. If it’s viable, what would the values on either end have to be?
Transactions
TOR
    Thoughts? Oilers get a proven goalie. Leafs clear cap space.
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2023
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2024
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2281 500 000 $78 413 116 $0 $400 000 $3 086 884 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
    C
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    950 000 $950 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AD, AG
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    825 000 $825 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    DG
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    750 000 $750 000 $
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    894 167 $894 167 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    20 nov. 2021 à 9 h 57
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 18,913
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
    Mrazek isn't worth his cap hit
    Faulk_my_Dzingel, oilersfan150, exo2769 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
    20 nov. 2021 à 10 h 1
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Smythe.over.Hart
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 3,032
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,348
    Quoting: ChiHawk
    Mrazek isn't worth his cap hit


    At this point I’d say no. But if he bounces back? My concern is if Campbell keeps playing as he is and barring an injury, he won’t really get a chance to prove he can bounce back. If he goes somewhere else he can play more and be in the 1A 1B role, or even solid starter.
    20 nov. 2021 à 10 h 6
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 18,913
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
    Quoting: faulkmydzingel
    At this point I’d say no. But if he bounces back? My concern is if Campbell keeps playing as he is and barring an injury, he won’t really get a chance to prove he can bounce back. If he goes somewhere else he can play more and be in the 1A 1B role, or even solid starter.


    Mrazek played in Carolina behind a top 5 defense. He's simply not a true starter or 1A, he's simply a backup. In a flat cap world, a almost $4M cap hit for a backup is a luxury not many teams want.
    20 nov. 2021 à 10 h 7
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2020
    Messages: 10,172
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,853
    I think if I recall there was a fallout between Holland and Mrazek in Detroit so because of that the oilers decline aside from everything else.
    20 nov. 2021 à 10 h 8
    #5
    TuckerKaberleSundin
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2020
    Messages: 1,249
    Mentions "j'aime": 630
    What Edmonton needs is stability and certainty in net. Mrazek isn't quite that.
    20 nov. 2021 à 10 h 11
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Smythe.over.Hart
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 3,032
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,348
    Quoting: ChiHawk
    Mrazek played in Carolina behind a top 5 defense. He's simply not a true starter or 1A, he's simply a backup. In a flat cap world, a almost $4M cap hit for a backup is a luxury not many teams want.


    Hmmm. Hard to argue against or for you a on this. From games I’ve watched Mrazek I’ve thought he’s quite solid. But I do agree that a goalie can be inflated by the defensive system in front of him.
    20 nov. 2021 à 10 h 12
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2019
    Messages: 1,058
    Mentions "j'aime": 457
    I don’t see why Edmonton goes for Mrazek at 3.5M for 2 more years after this one with the injuries he has had this year, when they can get Jake Allen for 1M less for only 1 more year after this year.
    20 nov. 2021 à 10 h 13
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Smythe.over.Hart
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 3,032
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,348
    Quoting: SheaWeber6
    What Edmonton needs is stability and certainty in net. Mrazek isn't quite that.


    You’re right with this. Unfortunately that will come at quite the premium these days. A Helly, Gibson, Saros, etc don’t exactly come cheap.
    20 nov. 2021 à 10 h 13
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 18,913
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
    Quoting: Lochness1202
    I don’t see why Edmonton goes for Mrazek at 3.5M for 2 more years after this one with the injuries he has had this year, when they can get Jake Allen for 1M less for only 1 more year after this year.


    $3.8M
    20 nov. 2021 à 10 h 14
    #10
    Démarrer sujet
    Smythe.over.Hart
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 3,032
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,348
    Quoting: Lochness1202
    I don’t see why Edmonton goes for Mrazek at 3.5M for 2 more years after this one with the injuries he has had this year, when they can get Jake Allen for 1M less for only 1 more year after this year.


    Yikes. I would definitely rather have Mrazek than Allen.
    20 nov. 2021 à 10 h 14
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2019
    Messages: 1,058
    Mentions "j'aime": 457
    Quoting: ChiHawk
    $3.8M

    Yiikes. That’s tough…with Campbell playing so well too and will need a raise next year to somewhere in the 5M dollar range, can’t think the leafs wouldn’t take a mulligan on that Mrazek contract.
    ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
    20 nov. 2021 à 10 h 17
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 18,913
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
    Quoting: Lochness1202
    Yiikes. That’s tough…with Campbell playing so well too and will need a raise next year to somewhere in the 5M dollar range, can’t think the leafs wouldn’t take a mulligan on that Mrazek contract.


    Yeah, Mrazek at $3M or under i get but in a flat cap world for almost $4M for a backup is just too much. I think the Leafs were comfortable given Soup's injury history, but diving into advanced analytics from his days in Carolina and it's clear his success was a result of solid defending in front of him. Not saying he's awful but almost $4m for a backup is a luxury that not many teams are going to pay the Leafs for. Leafs may have to at $1M if they want a decent asset back for him. With Flowers unlikely to sign again in Chicago, I could see Chicago using Mrazek as a backup at $2.8m for a 4th rounder or so.
    20 nov. 2021 à 10 h 17
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2019
    Messages: 1,058
    Mentions "j'aime": 457
    Quoting: faulkmydzingel
    Yikes. I would definitely rather have Mrazek than Allen.


    Reallly? Why? Alllen has better career stats, one less year, 1M less and a Stanley cup winner.
    Genuinely curious how you would rather Mrazek over Allen give their play and contracts?
    Faulk_my_Dzingel a aimé ceci.
    20 nov. 2021 à 10 h 29
    #14
    Démarrer sujet
    Smythe.over.Hart
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 3,032
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,348
    Quoting: Lochness1202
    Reallly? Why? Alllen has better career stats, one less year, 1M less and a Stanley cup winner.
    Genuinely curious how you would rather Mrazek over Allen give their play and contracts?


    Being a Leaf fan means I pay way too much attention to the Habs. I was also a Blues fan. I’ve watched Allen for a long time. Just not starter material. Last season proved that for Montreal. This year is hard to be the judgement as they are a dumpster fire.
    I will admit I forgot Allen was on his new contract. So I won’t argue with you there.
    20 nov. 2021 à 10 h 58
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 19,545
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,343
    Quoting: ChiHawk
    Yeah, Mrazek at $3M or under i get but in a flat cap world for almost $4M for a backup is just too much. I think the Leafs were comfortable given Soup's injury history, but diving into advanced analytics from his days in Carolina and it's clear his success was a result of solid defending in front of him. Not saying he's awful but almost $4m for a backup is a luxury that not many teams are going to pay the Leafs for. Leafs may have to at $1M if they want a decent asset back for him. With Flowers unlikely to sign again in Chicago, I could see Chicago using Mrazek as a backup at $2.8m for a 4th rounder or so.


    yeah, none of that is true at all. Mrazek is adequatly paid for a guy who is a 1B. which he is and the fact that he had an unlucky injury in his first game doesnt change that. He's paid exactly what he's worth on good term.
    20 nov. 2021 à 11 h 1
    #16
    TopDawgReese
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 1,241
    Mentions "j'aime": 253
    Anyone who says Mrazek isn’t worth his cap hit is lying. He’s a proven starter in Carolina, and is young still. The only issue is his injury concerns but he’s proven to be a good NHL goalie. He’s had a positive GSAx over the past 3 seasons.

    You also have to account the market. Is MAF any better currently? His numbers has been super inflated due to VGK strong defensive play since their inaugural season and now it’s shown he’s the same goalie as he was in Pittsburgh except now he’s on the wrong side of 30. Korpisalo isnt better, no are the other options available are better.
    20 nov. 2021 à 11 h 3
    #17
    TopDawgReese
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 1,241
    Mentions "j'aime": 253
    Quoting: JaredOfLondon
    yeah, none of that is true at all. Mrazek is adequatly paid for a guy who is a 1B. which he is and the fact that he had an unlucky injury in his first game doesnt change that. He's paid exactly what he's worth on good term.


    He’s a player from Toronto so he’s extremely undervalued in this site.

    We really shouldn’t be taking about value coming a person who supports the Blackhawk’s and Jones 9.5x8
    20 nov. 2021 à 11 h 9
    #18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 19,545
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,343
    Quoting: MauriceArthur15
    He’s a player from Toronto so he’s extremely undervalued in this site.

    We really shouldn’t be taking about value coming a person who supports the Blackhawk’s and Jones 9.5x8


    i like when people who ignore all the advanced stats that said the blackhawks would be awful this year turn around and use them to say a goalie for a different team had 'bad" advanced stats when that isnt true at all
    20 nov. 2021 à 11 h 15
    #19
    TopDawgReese
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 1,241
    Mentions "j'aime": 253
    Quoting: JaredOfLondon
    i like when people who ignore all the advanced stats that said the blackhawks would be awful this year turn around and use them to say a goalie for a different team had 'bad" advanced stats when that isnt true at all


    A prime example is Phillip Grubauer . People were calling him to get a Vezina last season but all the underlying numbers proved he was nothing more than an average starter behind a strong defensive system.

    Another one of those gambles that’s currently paying off is Fredrick Anderson however I do feel he will regress to the mean as he normally does from January onwards.
    20 nov. 2021 à 11 h 32
    #20
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 23,771
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,649
    Skinner: .944
    Smith: .920
    Koskinen: .910

    No need for another goalie, the Oilers already have 3 better ones.
    ChiHawk, oilersfan150 et exo2769 a aimé ceci.
    20 nov. 2021 à 11 h 40
    #21
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 18,913
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
    Quoting: JaredOfLondon
    yeah, none of that is true at all. Mrazek is adequatly paid for a guy who is a 1B. which he is and the fact that he had an unlucky injury in his first game doesnt change that. He's paid exactly what he's worth on good term.


    Yeah, none of what you are saying is accurate. Look at the advanced analytics of Mrazek in Carolina and you'll understand his save % was because of the defense, didn't face many high danger chances. He's a backup goalie and at almost $4M cap hit in a flat cap world he's overpaid.
    exo2769 et SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
    20 nov. 2021 à 11 h 44
    #22
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 18,913
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
    Quoting: JaredOfLondon
    i like when people who ignore all the advanced stats that said the blackhawks would be awful this year turn around and use them to say a goalie for a different team had 'bad" advanced stats when that isnt true at all


    Quoting: MauriceArthur15
    He’s a player from Toronto so he’s extremely undervalued in this site.

    We really shouldn’t be taking about value coming a person who supports the Blackhawk’s and Jones 9.5x8


    I love it when people deflect when someone comments against their idea or trade, then assume just because that person is a fan of a team to think every player is good or worth his contract. Some of us aren't die hard homers and know what reality is. If you've followed my comments, you'd know that goes down as one of the worst sign and trade deals bowman has ever done. I also never said the Hawks were going to be good this year.

    Back to the topic at hand, Mrazek is not a starting goalie, he's a backup. His advanced analytics prove that in carolina. At almost $4M for a backup he's overpaid. Sorry you take the truth so personal but don't be blinded by being a fan of a team. If someone from Carolina posted this trade on CF last year, Mrazek at $4M for a 2nd or 3rd, Leafs fans would be flaming that person.
    20 nov. 2021 à 11 h 53
    #23
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 18,913
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
    Quoting: MauriceArthur15
    Anyone who says Mrazek isn’t worth his cap hit is lying. He’s a proven starter in Carolina, and is young still. The only issue is his injury concerns but he’s proven to be a good NHL goalie. He’s had a positive GSAx over the past 3 seasons.

    You also have to account the market. Is MAF any better currently? His numbers has been super inflated due to VGK strong defensive play since their inaugural season and now it’s shown he’s the same goalie as he was in Pittsburgh except now he’s on the wrong side of 30. Korpisalo isnt better, no are the other options available are better.


    You clearly haven't looked into his advanced stats. Mrazek is not very good against high danger chances and is top 5 last year in rebounds per shot attempt. Those are the kind of stats that isolate a goalie from how good his defense was in front of him. Carolina is a top 5 defense, toronto is not.

    Now you want to talk about MAF in Chicago? Yeah, he got traded and wasn't happy about it so his first 5 games collectively weren't good even posting a .600 in one of those first 5 games.The last 7 games Flowers has a average .931 save % on a average of 33 shots faced per game behind a bad defense. Fleury and Mrazek should never be discussed together, it's not close.
    SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
    20 nov. 2021 à 11 h 55
    #24
    Démarrer sujet
    Smythe.over.Hart
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 3,032
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,348
    Quoting: ChiHawk
    I love it when people deflect when someone comments against their idea or trade, then assume just because that person is a fan of a team to think every player is good or worth his contract. Some of us aren't die hard homers and know what reality is. If you've followed my comments, you'd know that goes down as one of the worst sign and trade deals bowman has ever done. I also never said the Hawks were going to be good this year.

    Back to the topic at hand, Mrazek is not a starting goalie, he's a backup. His advanced analytics prove that in carolina. At almost $4M for a backup he's overpaid. Sorry you take the truth so personal but don't be blinded by being a fan of a team. If someone from Carolina posted this trade on CF last year, Mrazek at $4M for a 2nd or 3rd, Leafs fans would be flaming that person.


    You should probably do yourself a favour and see some of the comments on here the day Mrazek was signed. Generally pretty positive reviews except for the general leaf hate. Carolina fans specifically stating they will miss him and wish they could have signed him at that value.

    Now you can post analytics all you want, but quality watching over quantity watching is key. How goalies perform under pressure, who is On the ice when goals are scored against etc. hurricanes fans will tell you that when Jake Gardiner was on the ice, they still felt confident with Mrazek back there. That’s a qualitative stat that no chart will show you.
    20 nov. 2021 à 12 h 3
    #25
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 18,913
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
    Modifié 20 nov. 2021 à 12 h 21
    Quoting: faulkmydzingel
    You should probably do yourself a favour and see some of the comments on here the day Mrazek was signed. Generally pretty positive reviews except for the general leaf hate. Carolina fans specifically stating they will miss him and wish they could have signed him at that value.

    Now you can post analytics all you want, but quality watching over quantity watching is key. How goalies perform under pressure, who is On the ice when goals are scored against etc. hurricanes fans will tell you that when Jake Gardiner was on the ice, they still felt confident with Mrazek back there. That’s a qualitative stat that no chart will show you.


    You can absolutely dive into some deep analytics to look at who was on the ice with Mrazek when he lets in goals. Look up rebounds. Mrazek was the bottom 5 of all goalies that played last year in giving up rebounds; that speaks volumes. I watch a ton of hockey and thoroughly enjoy watching Carolina and Toronto for that matter. Fans sentiment is often misguided as most of them don't understand the game well enough to evaluate individual players well enough. Mrazek is a backup goalie on a good team period, not a 1A simply a backup. Carolina made a big upgrade with Andersen. Just look at the two how they each fared in Carolina and Andersen is much better in net in Carolina then Mrazek was. Some Leaf fans thought Mrazek is an upgrade which I chuckled at and still do. I'm also willing to bet Andersen is a top 10 or maybe top 5 goalie this season now that he's behind a solid defensive system from a save %, but save % can be the most misleading stat for goalies and unfortunately the one fans most often look at to judge a goalie. Needless to say, comparing them both in that carolina system is worth wild comparison.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage