Quoting: jnowariak
IDK, it’d be great to have all these guys but you’d have to pay quite a bit more for all of them. Not one blue chip prospect moving to get all of these guys? And 4 mil retained over 3 years on Kane itself is worth a first…
Sheesh, the Kane trade was a gift.
I purposely selected ACGM deals that I saw as favorable to NJD. I expect none of this to happen. But its fun.
Quoting: EccE
I believe that the Fiala trade has been discussed deeply in those ACGMs mentioned. The conclusion pretty much was that the Wild decline, since we are only getting a meh package with no game-breaking picks/prospects coming back.
Some of the Wild offers were for less! But I hear you. If he signs extension (or willing to sign with acquiring team), I think there needs to be a 1st or better prospect included (or both). But if he just wants to sign QO and go to UFA, than these prices make sense. Timing the whole thing will be tricky for Billy G to maximize return.
Quoting: Nate
Leafs arent doing that. We arent trading another first round pick for a rental, especially one that is going to cost 4.5 million dollars to play on the third pair. Not only that, but Mikheyev, albeit a tad snake bitten right now, is an effective defensive forward that can drive some offense and is going to slot into the lineup when healthy.
For sure. 100% agree. A Subban-to-Leafs trade would likely be Subban (at 25%, double-retained) for B prospect and 2nd/3rd (depending who pays for third team to retain 25%). I had liked Subban (at 25%) for Mike Koster and 2023 2nd (NJD sends 4th to third team).
At trade deadline, there is only 20% of season left. So his cap hit, since he is on final year, is manageable.
Subban at 100% - $9,000,000 hit
Subban at 50% - $4,500,000 hit
Subban at 25% - $2,250,000 hit
Subban at 25% at deadline - $450,000 hit