SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Building an all-star top-6 out of other teams trades

Créé par: NHLfan10506
Équipe: 2021-22 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 19 nov. 2021
Publié: 19 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Ratings on scale of 1-to-10:

Likelihood of this ACGM being realistic..............2
Likelihood of OP just having fun.........................10
Likelihood of people actually reading Intro......4
Likelihood of a silly comment on size................7
Likelihood of being a very watchable team......10

Those top two lines are six of the most fun players to watch in all of hockey. (3rd line would be no snooze either).
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Brady, Cole [Liste de réserve]
  2. Zacha, Pavel
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (CBJ)
Détails additionnels:
ACGM ID: 2780371
2.
NJD
  1. Kane, Patrick (4 000 000 $ retained)
CHI
  1. Boqvist, Jesper
  2. Gauthier, Frédérik
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (NJD)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
ACGM ID: 2892259
3.
MIN
  1. Kuokkanen, Janne
  2. Okhotiuk, Nikita
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
based on two Wild ACGMs: #2909339 and #2906236
4.
NJD
  1. Mikheyev, Ilya
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Subban, P.K. (4 500 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
ACGM ID: 2819152
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de NJD
Logo de TOR
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de EDM
Logo de NYI
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2023
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2024
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $70 121 402 $0 $3 757 500 $11 378 598 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
-1 375 000 $-1 375 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 100 000 $5 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
975 000 $975 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 166 667 $3 166 667 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 nov. 2021 à 8 h 42
#1
Icedragon4405
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,765
Mentions "j'aime": 453
This is very well done, description is good too. Funny post.
NHLfan10506 a aimé ceci.
19 nov. 2021 à 9 h 19
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
IDK, it’d be great to have all these guys but you’d have to pay quite a bit more for all of them. Not one blue chip prospect moving to get all of these guys? And 4 mil retained over 3 years on Kane itself is worth a first…
19 nov. 2021 à 9 h 19
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 1,921
Mentions "j'aime": 1,251
I believe that the Fiala trade has been discussed deeply in those ACGMs mentioned. The conclusion pretty much was that the Wild decline, since we are only getting a meh package with no game-breaking picks/prospects coming back.
Caerii a aimé ceci.
19 nov. 2021 à 9 h 37
#4
Deleted
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 3,175
Mentions "j'aime": 1,812
Leafs arent doing that. We arent trading another first round pick for a rental, especially one that is going to cost 4.5 million dollars to play on the third pair. Not only that, but Mikheyev, albeit a tad snake bitten right now, is an effective defensive forward that can drive some offense and is going to slot into the lineup when healthy.
19 nov. 2021 à 10 h 12
#5
GO KNIGHTS GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 2,626
Mentions "j'aime": 2,269
Quoting: Nate
Leafs arent doing that. We arent trading another first round pick for a rental, especially one that is going to cost 4.5 million dollars to play on the third pair. Not only that, but Mikheyev, albeit a tad snake bitten right now, is an effective defensive forward that can drive some offense and is going to slot into the lineup when healthy.

Quoting: NHLfan10506
Likelihood of people actually reading Intro......4

Darn right
NHLfan10506 et Garak a aimé ceci.
19 nov. 2021 à 10 h 19
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,118
Mentions "j'aime": 18,340
Quoting: jnowariak
IDK, it’d be great to have all these guys but you’d have to pay quite a bit more for all of them. Not one blue chip prospect moving to get all of these guys? And 4 mil retained over 3 years on Kane itself is worth a first…


Sheesh, the Kane trade was a gift.

I purposely selected ACGM deals that I saw as favorable to NJD. I expect none of this to happen. But its fun.

Quoting: EccE
I believe that the Fiala trade has been discussed deeply in those ACGMs mentioned. The conclusion pretty much was that the Wild decline, since we are only getting a meh package with no game-breaking picks/prospects coming back.


Some of the Wild offers were for less! But I hear you. If he signs extension (or willing to sign with acquiring team), I think there needs to be a 1st or better prospect included (or both). But if he just wants to sign QO and go to UFA, than these prices make sense. Timing the whole thing will be tricky for Billy G to maximize return.

Quoting: Nate
Leafs arent doing that. We arent trading another first round pick for a rental, especially one that is going to cost 4.5 million dollars to play on the third pair. Not only that, but Mikheyev, albeit a tad snake bitten right now, is an effective defensive forward that can drive some offense and is going to slot into the lineup when healthy.


For sure. 100% agree. A Subban-to-Leafs trade would likely be Subban (at 25%, double-retained) for B prospect and 2nd/3rd (depending who pays for third team to retain 25%). I had liked Subban (at 25%) for Mike Koster and 2023 2nd (NJD sends 4th to third team).

At trade deadline, there is only 20% of season left. So his cap hit, since he is on final year, is manageable.

Subban at 100% - $9,000,000 hit
Subban at 50% - $4,500,000 hit
Subban at 25% - $2,250,000 hit
Subban at 25% at deadline - $450,000 hit
19 nov. 2021 à 10 h 21
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
Yeah, that’s fair. I always forget we’re not actually the real GMs…
19 nov. 2021 à 11 h 5
#8
Patient gm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,864
Mentions "j'aime": 992
I like your intro
NHLfan10506 a aimé ceci.
19 nov. 2021 à 11 h 25
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 1,907
Mentions "j'aime": 449
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Sheesh, the Kane trade was a gift.

I purposely selected ACGM deals that I saw as favorable to NJD. I expect none of this to happen. But its fun.



Some of the Wild offers were for less! But I hear you. If he signs extension (or willing to sign with acquiring team), I think there needs to be a 1st or better prospect included (or both). But if he just wants to sign QO and go to UFA, than these prices make sense. Timing the whole thing will be tricky for Billy G to maximize return.



For sure. 100% agree. A Subban-to-Leafs trade would likely be Subban (at 25%, double-retained) for B prospect and 2nd/3rd (depending who pays for third team to retain 25%). I had liked Subban (at 25%) for Mike Koster and 2023 2nd (NJD sends 4th to third team).

At trade deadline, there is only 20% of season left. So his cap hit, since he is on final year, is manageable.

Subban at 100% - $9,000,000 hit
Subban at 50% - $4,500,000 hit
Subban at 25% - $2,250,000 hit
Subban at 25% at deadline - $450,000 hit


Even if he doesn't he will get a 1st. Good young players like FIALA always get a 1st , so you are wrong about that
19 nov. 2021 à 11 h 47
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,118
Mentions "j'aime": 18,340
Quoting: CAPDumba
Even if he doesn't he will get a 1st. Good young players like FIALA always get a 1st , so you are wrong about that


If Fiala signs (or willing to sign) multi-year extension, sure, should absolutely return a 1st rounder. But if Fiala signs QO or 1-year deal, his value goes down. Could still get a 1st from contender at deadline. But I doubt Wild will be sellers at 2023 deadline. And if they could fit him into their budget on day 1, it seems likely they would be able to fit him for whole season. But if MIN wants to move him before start of 2022-23 season (to clear cap space).... may be harder to find a 1st.

I think the timing is key.
19 nov. 2021 à 11 h 49
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,346
Mentions "j'aime": 3,385
Quoting: NHLfan10506
If Fiala signs (or willing to sign) multi-year extension, sure, should absolutely return a 1st rounder. But if Fiala signs QO or 1-year deal, his value goes down. Could still get a 1st from contender at deadline. But I doubt Wild will be sellers at 2023 deadline. And if they could fit him into their budget on day 1, it seems likely they would be able to fit him for whole season. But if MIN wants to move him before start of 2022-23 season (to clear cap space).... may be harder to find a 1st.

I think the timing is key.


Reinhart got a 1st+prospect in the exact same situation Fiala will be this summer WITHOUT a contract
GophersBenJ a aimé ceci.
19 nov. 2021 à 11 h 50
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 1,907
Mentions "j'aime": 449
Quoting: NHLfan10506
If Fiala signs (or willing to sign) multi-year extension, sure, should absolutely return a 1st rounder. But if Fiala signs QO or 1-year deal, his value goes down. Could still get a 1st from contender at deadline. But I doubt Wild will be sellers at 2023 deadline. And if they could fit him into their budget on day 1, it seems likely they would be able to fit him for whole season. But if MIN wants to move him before start of 2022-23 season (to clear cap space).... may be harder to find a 1st.

I think the timing is key.


The off-season doesn't change a thing. Rasmus r just got a 1st. Teams will always give away 1st round pick for player's of Fiala quality. Doesn't matter if they have a year , or 6 month. We have seen it happen
19 nov. 2021 à 12 h 54
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,118
Mentions "j'aime": 18,340
Quoting: CAPDumba
The off-season doesn't change a thing. Rasmus r just got a 1st. Teams will always give away 1st round pick for player's of Fiala quality. Doesn't matter if they have a year , or 6 month. We have seen it happen


1st rounders are rarely traded at beginning if cycle. They are almost all dealt just before draft or at deadline (and in some years before expansion draft). Risto was traded at 2021 draft (for a 2021 pick).

So you would be looking at 2022 draft picks. Not 2023 draft picks. That makes the calendar tricky.

Jan 1: First day Fiala can sign extension.
March 21: 2021-22 Trade deadline
June 30: Last day of playoffs
July 8: 2022 NHL draft
July 11: Deadline for teams to make qualifying offer
July 13: Free agency window opens

So he would likely need to be traded between June 30-July 8 (which is before he has gotten a qualifying offer). If he wants a bigger deal (or to go to UFA sooner to get bigger deal), he will have not signed an extension during the 2021-22 season. That means that MIN will almost guaranteed to be trading the players rights and not a fully signed player. Can be a challenge to getting full price.

The comps to use are probably
(1) Sam Reinhart
(2) Pavel Buchnevich
19 nov. 2021 à 13 h 42
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 1,907
Mentions "j'aime": 449
Quoting: NHLfan10506
1st rounders are rarely traded at beginning if cycle. They are almost all dealt just before draft or at deadline (and in some years before expansion draft). Risto was traded at 2021 draft (for a 2021 pick).

So you would be looking at 2022 draft picks. Not 2023 draft picks. That makes the calendar tricky.

Jan 1: First day Fiala can sign extension.
March 21: 2021-22 Trade deadline
June 30: Last day of playoffs
July 8: 2022 NHL draft
July 11: Deadline for teams to make qualifying offer
July 13: Free agency window opens

So he would likely need to be traded between June 30-July 8 (which is before he has gotten a qualifying offer). If he wants a bigger deal (or to go to UFA sooner to get bigger deal), he will have not signed an extension during the 2021-22 season. That means that MIN will almost guaranteed to be trading the players rights and not a fully signed player. Can be a challenge to getting full price.

The comps to use are probably
(1) Sam Reinhart
(2) Pavel Buchnevich


Pavel b was trades for other reason. And everyone was like Rangers could have gotten a better offer. What you are forgetting is wild Don't need to get rid of Donaldson in the offseason. They can at deadline. No matter what a gm out there will pay 1st round pick. No, you should use Rasmus also because there's a gm who will always pay for player of Fiala's skill.
19 nov. 2021 à 13 h 50
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,118
Mentions "j'aime": 18,340
Quoting: CAPDumba
Pavel b was trades for other reason. And everyone was like Rangers could have gotten a better offer. What you are forgetting is wild Don't need to get rid of Donaldson in the offseason. They can at deadline. No matter what a gm out there will pay 1st round pick. No, you should use Rasmus also because there's a gm who will always pay for player of Fiala's skill.


Who is Donaldson?

And read the post above...Wild have a window between June 30-July 8 to trade Fiala's rights. Before that would be selling at this year's deadline and making team less competitive for playoffs. Later would mean a lesser return.
19 nov. 2021 à 14 h 6
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 1,907
Mentions "j'aime": 449
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Who is Donaldson?

And read the post above...Wild have a window between June 30-July 8 to trade Fiala's rights. Before that would be selling at this year's deadline and making team less competitive for playoffs. Later would mean a lesser return.


According to you? You just want to say something that has no bases to it. Sorry a player getting traded with less time doesn't reduce their standing, or cost
19 nov. 2021 à 14 h 50
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,118
Mentions "j'aime": 18,340
Quoting: CAPDumba
According to you? You just want to say something that has no bases to it. Sorry a player getting traded with less time doesn't reduce their standing, or cost


I suggest you familiarize yourself with the rules and customs of the league before having internet debates about the rules and customs of the league. A players term (how many years their contract covers) has huge impact on trade value. Whether a player is under contract or not also has a huge impact on trade value.
19 nov. 2021 à 16 h 10
#18
Speak of the Devil
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 23,935
Mentions "j'aime": 26,436
Quoting: Caerii
Reinhart got a 1st+prospect in the exact same situation Fiala will be this summer WITHOUT a contract


Risto also got a 1st+ and is very similar to PK in terms of playing style, contract, and stats. PK is better defensively and is cheaper (after Devils retain 50%)
19 nov. 2021 à 16 h 47
#19
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,118
Mentions "j'aime": 18,340
Quoting: Caerii
Reinhart got a 1st+prospect in the exact same situation Fiala will be this summer WITHOUT a contract


Hence why I said Reinhart is probably the comp to use. I think Fiala’s price ends up somewhere between the Reinhart and Buchnevich deals. But I wouldn’t expect a 1st and an A prospect.
19 nov. 2021 à 17 h 10
#20
Bedard23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 9,294
Mentions "j'aime": 4,476
You need to add Jack Hughes to make the hawks deal work

I’m kidding don’t worry but still you need much more then that to get Kane
22 nov. 2021 à 21 h 24
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 419
Mentions "j'aime": 52
Bravo
NHLfan10506 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage