SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kubalik trades based on mantha comp

Créé par: Wadejos123
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 17 nov. 2021
Publié: 17 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Mantha was traded for Vrana, Panik, a 1st and 2nd. I view this deal as a comp to any potential kubalik trade. Keep in mind that Mantha also battles injuries two years in a row before the trade that kubalik did not. Since kubalik came to the NHL lkater in his career, I will comp their stats not taking into account Mantha's first 2 years in the league, which were his two most unproductive years anyways

Mantha:
Age when traded: 26
4 years 193 GP, 76 goals, 79 assists, 155 points
0.8 points per game and 0.39 goals per game

Kubalik:
Age when traded: 26
2 years 124 GP, 46 goals, 38 assits, 84 points
0.68 points per game, 0.37 goals per game

Mantha has kubalik beat in terms of production narrowly, however there is also negative value in Mantha's injury risk. Trade values should be similar in my opinion

Offers I would like to see from some teams I thunk could be interested below
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Bokk, Dominik
  2. Gardiner, Jake
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (CAR)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (CAR)
2.
CHI
  1. Turris, Kyle
  2. Yamamoto, Kailer
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
EDM
    Kubalik
    3.
    CHI
    1. Sharangovich, Yegor
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NJD)
    3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (NJD)
    NJD
      kubalik
      4.
      CHI
      1. Brännström, Erik
      2. Sanford, Zachary
      3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (OTT)
      4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
      OTT
        kubalik
        5.
        CHI
        1. Ritchie, Nick
        2. Robertson, Nicholas
        3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
        4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
        TOR
          Kubalik
          Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
          Enfoui
          Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
          2022
          Logo de EDM
          Logo de NJD
          Logo de TOR
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CAR
          Logo de OTT
          Logo de EDM
          Logo de TOR
          Logo de VGK
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CBJ
          Logo de CHI
          2023
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CAR
          Logo de OTT
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de TBL
          Logo de EDM
          Logo de NJD
          Logo de TOR
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CHI
          2024
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CHI
          Logo de CHI
          TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
          3181 500 000 $78 284 213 $452 439 $3 195 000 $3 215 787 $
          Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
          AG, AD
          UFA - 2
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
          C
          NMC
          UFA - 2
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
          AD
          NMC
          UFA - 2
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
          C
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
          AD, C, AG
          M-NTC
          UFA - 3
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
          AG
          UFA - 3
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
          C
          RFA - 2
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
          AD, C
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          912 500 $912 500 $
          AG, AD
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          997 500 $997 500 $
          C, AD
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          880 833 $880 833 $
          AD, C
          RFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
          AG, C, AD
          RFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          975 000 $975 000 $
          AG, C
          UFA - 2
          Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
          1 175 000 $1 175 000 $
          AD
          RFA - 1
          Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
          863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
          AG, AD
          UFA - 2
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
          C, AD
          RFA - 1
          Logo de Devils du New Jersey
          2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
          C, AG, AD
          UFA - 2
          Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
          2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
          AG, AD
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
          1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
          C, AD
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
          796 667 $796 667 $
          AG, AD
          RFA - 3
          Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
          2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
          AG
          UFA - 2
          Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
          DG/DD
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
          DD
          M-NTC
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
          G
          M-NTC
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
          DG/DD
          M-NTC
          UFA - 4
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
          DD
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          800 000 $800 000 $
          G
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
          DG
          RFA - 3
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          800 000 $800 000 $
          DG
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
          4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
          DG
          M-NTC
          UFA - 2
          Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
          863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance450 000 $$450K)
          DG/DD, AG
          RFA - 1
          Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
          C, AD
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          850 000 $850 000 $
          DG/DD
          UFA - 1
          Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
          811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
          AG, C
          RFA - 1

          Code d'intégration

          • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
          • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

          Texte intégré

          Cliquer pour surligner
          17 nov. 2021 à 16 h 51
          #1
          Vegan Commie Hipster
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: oct. 2020
          Messages: 7,888
          Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
          Quality post ✔

          Mantha with much better possession numbers tho

          But these seem like valid packages for kubalik
          Wadejos123, capsfan2121 et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
          17 nov. 2021 à 16 h 51
          #2
          Ovchinnikov 137
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: avr. 2019
          Messages: 10,412
          Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
          That trade was an absolute steal for DET then and even more so now. Leafs pass and I'm pretty sure the rest of these teams do also. CHI should just keep Kubalik
          capsfan2121 et palhal a aimé ceci.
          17 nov. 2021 à 16 h 55
          #3
          Démarrer sujet
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2017
          Messages: 8,280
          Mentions "j'aime": 4,924
          Quoting: MatthewsFan
          That trade was an absolute steal for DET then and even more so now. Leafs pass and I'm pretty sure the rest of these teams do also. CHI should just keep Kubalik


          we probably will. I've just been seeing a lot of kubalik trade posts so it was worth exploring
          Radu47, capsfan2121 et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
          17 nov. 2021 à 16 h 57
          #4
          Ovchinnikov 137
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: avr. 2019
          Messages: 10,412
          Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
          Quoting: Wadejos123
          we probably will. I've just been seeing a lot of kubalik trade posts so it was worth exploring


          Yup, all good. Leafs will have a hard enough time resigning Kase let alone Kubalik. With minimal cap incresases till 2026, Toronto will need rookies on ELC that can come in and produce
          17 nov. 2021 à 16 h 58
          #5
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juin 2019
          Messages: 38,287
          Mentions "j'aime": 19,536
          Mantha trade is not a good base, that trade was really odd in general. Also Kubalik would be the Vrana in any such deal since he's the young pendingi RFA and not the already locked up prime winger
          capsfan2121, jnowariak, justaBoss and 2 others a aimé ceci.
          17 nov. 2021 à 16 h 58
          #6
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: août 2020
          Messages: 3,892
          Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
          I think one thing to remember here is that Panik was a 3 by 3 mil cap dump that was probably the value of the 1st. “Upgrading” from Vrana to Matha was probably about a 2nd.

          That said, Kubalik should absolutely get a 1st, and probably a B prospect.
          17 nov. 2021 à 16 h 58
          #7
          Vegan Commie Hipster
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: oct. 2020
          Messages: 7,888
          Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
          Quoting: MatthewsFan
          That trade was an absolute steal for DET then and even more so now. Leafs pass and I'm pretty sure the rest of these teams do also. CHI should just keep Kubalik


          Naturally because of the Panik factor tho

          Which was silly because Panik is good

          Really not a fair precedent
          capsfan2121 a aimé ceci.
          17 nov. 2021 à 16 h 58
          #8
          Tintin over 1122
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2021
          Messages: 15,929
          Mentions "j'aime": 10,166
          Quoting: Wadejos123
          we probably will. I've just been seeing a lot of kubalik trade posts so it was worth exploring


          What would a trade for Kane look for the caps.
          17 nov. 2021 à 17 h 5
          #9
          Démarrer sujet
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2017
          Messages: 8,280
          Mentions "j'aime": 4,924
          Quoting: capsfan2121
          What would a trade for Kane look for the caps.


          Lappierre / McMichael
          Kempney (for cap)
          2 1st's
          capsfan2121 et SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
          17 nov. 2021 à 17 h 6
          #10
          Tintin over 1122
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2021
          Messages: 15,929
          Mentions "j'aime": 10,166
          Quoting: Wadejos123
          Lappierre / McMichael
          Kempney (for cap)
          2 1st's


          Lappy it is or protas and we add second
          17 nov. 2021 à 17 h 7
          #11
          Démarrer sujet
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2017
          Messages: 8,280
          Mentions "j'aime": 4,924
          Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
          Mantha trade is not a good base, that trade was really odd in general. Also Kubalik would be the Vrana in any such deal since he's the young pendingi RFA and not the already locked up prime winger


          Correct me if I'm wrong but Mantha was a pending RFA when he was traded. And kubalik is the same age now as mantha was last year. And Kubalik's production is more comparable to mantha's than vrana's (pre trade)
          17 nov. 2021 à 17 h 11
          #12
          KFTW
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juill. 2018
          Messages: 42,808
          Mentions "j'aime": 23,898
          I would do that trade if there was a protection on the 2023 pick
          17 nov. 2021 à 17 h 38
          #13
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juin 2019
          Messages: 38,287
          Mentions "j'aime": 19,536
          Quoting: Wadejos123
          Correct me if I'm wrong but Mantha was a pending RFA when he was traded. And kubalik is the same age now as mantha was last year. And Kubalik's production is more comparable to mantha's than vrana's (pre trade)


          Mantha had signed a long term deal with Detroit in November of 2020
          Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
          17 nov. 2021 à 17 h 38
          #14
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2019
          Messages: 40,088
          Mentions "j'aime": 18,336
          From NJD, the expectation is that Sharangovich's production would be similar to Kubalik's over the long-run, i.e., 25g winger (I don't think NJD plans to move him back to center).
          So probably a pass here.
          Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
          17 nov. 2021 à 17 h 49
          #15
          In Pridham we trust
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mai 2015
          Messages: 3,589
          Mentions "j'aime": 1,969
          4 year track record > 2 year track record. There's also the size factor, with most GMs loving giant forwards that can score.

          And the fact, like Ledge & Dairy pointed out, Mantha had signed a 4 yr deal prior to the move.

          Not a great comparable.
          CD282 a aimé ceci.
          17 nov. 2021 à 18 h 17
          #16
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mars 2017
          Messages: 24,015
          Mentions "j'aime": 7,737
          Is Kubalik a 6'5, 235 lb. power forward? You can't just use production to compare players.

          As for the Edmonton trade, Yamamoto is younger, cheaper and under team control for longer - and actually has outperformed Kubalik at 5v5 over the past 2+ seasons, 0.45 P/GP vs 0.42 P/GP. No way you get him AND a first AND a second.
          17 nov. 2021 à 18 h 26
          #17
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: mars 2021
          Messages: 322
          Mentions "j'aime": 180
          Quoting: CD282
          Is Kubalik a 6'5, 235 lb. power forward? You can't just use production to compare players.

          As for the Edmonton trade, Yamamoto is younger, cheaper and under team control for longer - and actually has outperformed Kubalik at 5v5 over the past 2+ seasons, 0.45 P/GP vs 0.42 P/GP. No way you get him AND a first AND a second.


          While I personally think calling Mantha a power forward is a bit of a stretch (yes he's big, but he plays a very soft game), I would agree that Yamo + 1 + 2 is an overpay. For the Oilers, I'd counter with Lavoie, Turris, 1st and conditional 3rd. Really think Kubalik could fit well on the team as a sniper next to some of their elite passers.
          17 nov. 2021 à 18 h 37
          #18
          LongtimeLeafsufferer
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: juill. 2015
          Messages: 59,479
          Mentions "j'aime": 22,654
          Teams like Leafs, Oilers just don't have the cap to make a trade and signing like this without getting rid of equal cap.
          New Jersey and Ottawa will have cap next year but maybe they are better off keeping those young assets, spending money on a good UFA then trading for Kubalik type player.
          The Hawks made a foolish trade for Jones, giving up assests and then overpaying him on extension. Can't see other teams making the same mistake.
          17 nov. 2021 à 18 h 54
          #19
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: oct. 2019
          Messages: 4,986
          Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
          Im hopeful none of these come to fruition.
          17 nov. 2021 à 20 h 17
          #20
          Backn 2da leff-JFK
          Avatar de l'utilisateur
          Rejoint: août 2020
          Messages: 1,079
          Mentions "j'aime": 388
          I’m glad this is explored. Hawks should definitely keep Kubalik. They best deal is Dominik Bokk and Bean imo.
          And tbh the CAR option should be the only option. Kubalik is a guaranteed stud scoring winger and hawks have only Kane and Debrincat in that category.

          Edmonton is laughable in my opinion thought Yamamoto and Turris is a body easily replaced by many already on the roster.
          ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
           
          Répondre
          To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
          Question:
          Options:
          Ajouter une option
          Soumettre le sondage