SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

aquire a few picks

Créé par: Wadejos123
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 17 nov. 2021
Publié: 17 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Hickey, Thomas
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (COL)
Détails additionnels:
I would say dehaan is worth about a third but I bumped the pick up because hickey is a pure cap dump
NYI
  1. De Haan, Calvin
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (CBJ)
Détails additionnels:
Isles are getting desperate for a dman, Dehaan is a fmailar face for them. He is expendable to the hawks with Kalynuk back and Caleb Jones very near his return as well
2.
CHI
  1. Koskinen, Mikko
  2. Turris, Kyle
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Fleury, Marc-André (3 500 000 $ retained)
  2. Gaudette, Adam
3.
CHI
    waived/ traded if someone wants him
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de COL
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    2023
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    2024
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $69 282 547 $452 439 $3 382 500 $12 217 453 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
    C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    AG, C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    975 000 $975 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    850 000 $850 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    800 000 $800 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    912 500 $912 500 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    17 nov. 2021 à 15 h 26
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2019
    Messages: 466
    Mentions "j'aime": 157
    Hopefully that missing 1st round this year is just outside top 2. Columbus could use it and the Blackhawks organization doesn't deserve it.
    edmonton would most likely take that trade
    17 nov. 2021 à 15 h 27
    #2
    Hakuna Matata
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2020
    Messages: 33,185
    Mentions "j'aime": 20,724
    You can do better

    Trade Kubalik for a 1st (Despite the slower start we know what he can do)

    Strome for a 2nd or 3rd (Looking at you Minnesota)

    3-way trade MAF without needing to take on anything so in the end his cap hit is 1.75mill for his new team (Tampa gonna somehow make it work)

    Trade Gaudette and Carpanter for low picks as contenders seem to like guys like them

    The De Haan trade though could happen in that manner to get maximum value
    17 nov. 2021 à 15 h 28
    #3
    Brock On Dudes
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 1,801
    Mentions "j'aime": 521
    we probably dont need to move hickey anyway considering wed have 18M in cap space at the deadline
    17 nov. 2021 à 15 h 31
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 5,536
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,536
    They could get a little more for flower if they have to take back turris and koskinen. His value should be a 2nd if he's half retained. Taking back that much cap should up the return for Chicago.
    ChiHawk et Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
    17 nov. 2021 à 15 h 49
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 18,913
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,201
    Quoting: SociallyHawkward
    They could get a little more for flower if they have to take back turris and koskinen. His value should be a 2nd if he's half retained. Taking back that much cap should up the return for Chicago.


    Bingo. Flowers retained as a stand alone deal is a late 2nd rounder; taking back cap easily pushes that to a late 1st.
    17 nov. 2021 à 15 h 51
    #6
    TommyGunns
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2018
    Messages: 322
    Mentions "j'aime": 68
    Quoting: SociallyHawkward
    They could get a little more for flower if they have to take back turris and koskinen. His value should be a 2nd if he's half retained. Taking back that much cap should up the return for Chicago.


    Chicago owes Edmonton for getting a better defenseman and no cap retention for Keith.
    17 nov. 2021 à 15 h 52
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 18,913
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,201
    Quoting: aadoyle
    You can do better

    Trade Kubalik for a 1st (Despite the slower start we know what he can do)

    Strome for a 2nd or 3rd (Looking at you Minnesota)

    3-way trade MAF without needing to take on anything so in the end his cap hit is 1.75mill for his new team (Tampa gonna somehow make it work)

    Trade Gaudette and Carpanter for low picks as contenders seem to like guys like them

    The De Haan trade though could happen in that manner to get maximum value


    Would be dumb to trade Kubs for anything less then a top 20 pick and even then, it's a big gamble by the Hawks. How many draft picks from say the range of #10 overall to #20 overall become a top 25 goal scorer in the league (defensive players aside)? That's a small percentage so the likelihood of landing a player in the draft as good as Kubalik or better is less then good.
    17 nov. 2021 à 15 h 54
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 18,913
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,201
    Quoting: tommygunns
    Chicago owes Edmonton for getting a better defenseman and no cap retention for Keith.


    If only the business world worked that way but it doesn't. Whether Caleb is better then Keith is also TBD as he hasn't played a game yet for the Hawks due to injury and he's not a shoe-in over Stillman or Kalynuk either so I would say as of now from the Hawks experience Keith is providing more value in the NHL.
    17 nov. 2021 à 16 h 26
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 8,184
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,786
    Quoting: aadoyle
    You can do better

    Trade Kubalik for a 1st (Despite the slower start we know what he can do)

    Strome for a 2nd or 3rd (Looking at you Minnesota)

    3-way trade MAF without needing to take on anything so in the end his cap hit is 1.75mill for his new team (Tampa gonna somehow make it work)

    Trade Gaudette and Carpanter for low picks as contenders seem to like guys like them

    The De Haan trade though could happen in that manner to get maximum value


    Quoting: ChiHawk
    Would be dumb to trade Kubs for anything less then a top 20 pick and even then, it's a big gamble by the Hawks. How many draft picks from say the range of #10 overall to #20 overall become a top 25 goal scorer in the league (defensive players aside)? That's a small percentage so the likelihood of landing a player in the draft as good as Kubalik or better is less then good.


    I agree with chihawk. Just to elaborate more, I don't see why Kubalik returns any less than what mantha got last year (Vrana, Panik, 1st, 2nd)
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage