Kyle Clifford, acquired by TOR, is a defensive fourth line forward with a poor penalty differential who's been playing pretty tiny minutes in St. Louis. #LeafsForeverpic.twitter.com/p4807M6N0E
Correct me if I'm wrong, but does 28% mean he's "better" than 28% of the league? What's wrong with that?
It's hard to explain (I'm just not good at explaining it), but essentially if you see a guy at 50% it means he's about bang average at the TOI he's given. So anything above 50% he's complacent at, and anything below he's bad for that TOI. Because his QOC% is 0% it literally means he plays against the worst players in the league and he still puts up those stats (which besides defense are bad). It's not a good look for that QOC & his TOI
To sum it up, he plays 4th line minutes against the worst players in the league and still puts up bad stats. IE he's not an NHL player.
Maybe someone can sum it up better for you, but that's what I got.
Disney is making a movie about it, I believe it'll be out by Christmas, it has Tom Holland as Marner, Toby Mcquire as J.T. , Andrew Garfield as Nylander, Benedict Cumberbatch as Matthews, Williem Dafoe as F. Anderson, Alfred Molina as Clifford, John Favreau as Keefe, JK Simmons as Aryes and Marisa Tomei as Mrazek.
I think it's called Leaf-Game - Embarrassment On Home Ice
Disney is making a movie about it, I believe it'll be out by Christmas, it has Tom Holland as Marner, Toby Mcquire as J.T. , Andrew Garfield as Nylander, Benedict Cumberbatch as Matthews, Williem Dafoe as F. Anderson, Alfred Molina as Clifford, John Favreau as Keefe, JK Simmons as Aryes and Marisa Tomei as Mrazek.
I think it's called Leaf-Game - Embarrassment On Home Ice
I thought Disney gave up on straight to DVD nonsense... Oh well they be wasting money again I guess
In general MLSE wont allow Disney to use the Leafs logo nor name so meh let them do the movie who cares. And legally they cant cast any character you mentioned without that said persons permission and I doubt any will agree to have their names portrayed in a movie like this. Anyways good for Ayers for getting their attention as not many people can say they have done it.
I thought Disney gave up on straight to DVD nonsense... Oh well they be wasting money again I guess
In general MLSE wont allow Disney to use the Leafs logo nor name so meh let them do the movie who cares. And legally they cant cast any character you mentioned without that said persons permission and I doubt any will agree to have their names portrayed in a movie like this. Anyways good for Ayers for getting their attention as not many people can say they have done it.
I think the joke did a flyby over your head.
The cast I mentioned is for Spiderman - No Way Home
The cast I mentioned is for Spiderman - No Way Home
When I saw Garfield "No way home" was out of my memory as he said he wont be in it and after how amazing went and he getting in a fight with Sony one has a hard time seeing him want to come back. Could be wrong though
It's hard to explain (I'm just not good at explaining it), but essentially if you see a guy at 50% it means he's about bang average at the TOI he's given. So anything above 50% he's complacent at, and anything below he's bad for that TOI. Because his QOC% is 0% it literally means he plays against the worst players in the league and he still puts up those stats (which besides defense are bad). It's not a good look for that QOC & his TOI
To sum it up, he plays 4th line minutes against the worst players in the league and still puts up bad stats. IE he's not an NHL player.
Maybe someone can sum it up better for you, but that's what I got.
No, that makes sense. I didn't realize he's actually plays against the legit worst players in the league. That's a fair critizism. I stand by with my earlier opinion though, but I understand where you're coming from.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but does 28% mean he's "better" than 28% of the league? What's wrong with that?
Quoting: KSIxSKULLS
It's hard to explain (I'm just not good at explaining it), but essentially if you see a guy at 50% it means he's about bang average at the TOI he's given. So anything above 50% he's complacent at, and anything below he's bad for that TOI. Because his QOC% is 0% it literally means he plays against the worst players in the league and he still puts up those stats (which besides defense are bad). It's not a good look for that QOC & his TOI
To sum it up, he plays 4th line minutes against the worst players in the league and still puts up bad stats. IE he's not an NHL player.
Maybe someone can sum it up better for you, but that's what I got.
KSIxSKULLS is not correct.
The 28% does mean he's better than 28% of the league (WAR compares him to the entire NHL) ... So he's an above average 4th liner.
However, the numbers below that do compare him to other 4th liners ... That's why he's at:
- 83% for even-strength defense.
- 53% for even-strength offense.
You can't be better than the average 4th line at offense + defense and still one of the worst 4th liners.