SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Build for the future

Créé par: BigDog91
Équipe: 2022-23 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 16 nov. 2021
Publié: 16 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
66 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
44 000 000 $
23 000 000 $
Transactions
BUF
  1. Karlsson, Erik
Détails additionnels:
Not sure on the value.
SJS
  1. Johnson, Ryan [Liste de réserve]
  2. Skinner, Jeff
Détails additionnels:
Johnson is first round pick LHD
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de BUF
Logo de FLA
Logo de VGK
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de NJD
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2023
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de PHI
Logo de VGK
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2024
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2082 500 000 $58 893 333 $0 $2 195 000 $23 606 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
825 000 $825 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
855 833 $855 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 nov. 2021 à 13 h 47
#1
Xercuses
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 13,306
Mentions "j'aime": 3,548
Karlsson doesnt waive so it doesnt matter
16 nov. 2021 à 13 h 50
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,638
Mentions "j'aime": 585
Ew sabres dont do this
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
16 nov. 2021 à 13 h 51
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,133
Mentions "j'aime": 14,143
How is this building for the future? We trade a 20 year old and a very bad contract for a worse contract who is 2 years older than our very bad contract
16 nov. 2021 à 13 h 58
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 166
Mentions "j'aime": 37
Quoting: xercuses
Karlsson doesnt waive so it doesnt matter


Skinner also has a NMC and said he doesn't want to leave Buffalo
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
16 nov. 2021 à 13 h 59
#5
Démarrer sujet
BigDog91
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 1,508
Mentions "j'aime": 374
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
How is this building for the future? We trade a 20 year old and a very bad contract for a worse contract who is 2 years older than our very bad contract


Sabres need RHD and have alot of depth on wings and LHD. Skinner allows sabres to bring up rookies and not feel obligated to but skinner ahead of younger players. With picks we would get at deadline and the picks we have sabres should have one of the best prospect pools in NHL even if they bring up all the rookies i brought up. The sabres will have alot of cap space to take on bad contracts for picks/ prospects to improve the team.
16 nov. 2021 à 14 h 16
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,968
Mentions "j'aime": 4,538
Counter proposal:
Jack Quinn for Ryan Merkley and a 2nd?
both are young 1st round picks Merkley would add a Power play QB and give you offensive upside, but Quinn is clearly the better prospect. hence the 2nd back.
this might fit for both teams but I don't know a lot about Quinn TBH.
Your thoughts?
16 nov. 2021 à 15 h 8
#7
Sabres are elite
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,979
Mentions "j'aime": 3,299
Nah Skinner is better than Karlsson, younger, and scores goals which has typically been the problem with the Sabres. No desire to acquire a more expensive, older, and injury prone player while also giving up a prospect with good top 4 potential

Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Counter proposal:
Jack Quinn for Ryan Merkley and a 2nd?
both are young 1st round picks Merkley would add a Power play QB and give you offensive upside, but Quinn is clearly the better prospect. hence the 2nd back.
this might fit for both teams but I don't know a lot about Quinn TBH.
Your thoughts?


Quinn is far better than Merkley at offense AND defense. The 2nd is not the gap between the two.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
16 nov. 2021 à 15 h 52
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,968
Mentions "j'aime": 4,538
Quinn is far better than Merkley at offense AND defense. The 2nd is not the gap between the two.[/quote]

Quinn and Merkley are different players. yes Quin would be better offensively as Quin is a RW and Merkley is a RD.
Merkley is a future power play QB who can make a team better but his D is suspect, however he isn't as bad as I thought in the D zone, just look at that buffalo sharks game a few games back.

I only counter offered because you guys were looking at trading a wing for a D man in this ACGM and I thought this was a better fit than the initial post.
what would you counter with? we badly need a RW for our top 6.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
16 nov. 2021 à 17 h 31
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,133
Mentions "j'aime": 14,143
Quoting: BigDog91
Sabres need RHD and have alot of depth on wings and LHD. Skinner allows sabres to bring up rookies and not feel obligated to but skinner ahead of younger players. With picks we would get at deadline and the picks we have sabres should have one of the best prospect pools in NHL even if they bring up all the rookies i brought up. The sabres will have alot of cap space to take on bad contracts for picks/ prospects to improve the team.


Ryan Johnson is capable of playing RHD and skinner is blocking no one.
16 nov. 2021 à 17 h 31
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,133
Mentions "j'aime": 14,143
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Counter proposal:
Jack Quinn for Ryan Merkley and a 2nd?
both are young 1st round picks Merkley would add a Power play QB and give you offensive upside, but Quinn is clearly the better prospect. hence the 2nd back.
this might fit for both teams but I don't know a lot about Quinn TBH.
Your thoughts?


I actually gasped
16 nov. 2021 à 17 h 32
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,133
Mentions "j'aime": 14,143
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Quinn is far better than Merkley at offense AND defense. The 2nd is not the gap between the two.


Quinn and Merkley are different players. yes Quin would be better offensively as Quin is a RW and Merkley is a RD.
Merkley is a future power play QB who can make a team better but his D is suspect, however he isn't as bad as I thought in the D zone, just look at that buffalo sharks game a few games back.

I only counter offered because you guys were looking at trading a wing for a D man in this ACGM and I thought this was a better fit than the initial post.
what would you counter with? we badly need a RW for our top 6.[/quote]

You guys? It was one guy and every Sabres fan disagreed
16 nov. 2021 à 17 h 38
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,968
Mentions "j'aime": 4,538
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
I actually gasped


ok i did say i wasn’t sure on Quinn ceiling or how coveted he is!
we need a RW capable of playing top 6 in a year or two if not sooner, if you have a counter offer please, otherwise your just here to scoff at people, that what facebook is for.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
16 nov. 2021 à 17 h 40
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,133
Mentions "j'aime": 14,143
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
ok i did say i wasn’t sure on Quinn ceiling or how coveted he is!
we need a RW capable of playing top 6 in a year or two if not sooner, if you have a counter offer please, otherwise your just here to scoff at people, that what facebook is for.


Quinn is not available
16 nov. 2021 à 17 h 41
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,968
Mentions "j'aime": 4,538
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Quinn is not available


what does Buffalo need most? and who would you be willing to part with that’s a RW RH shot?
i get that i made a mistake on this one and Quinn is to you guys what Eklund is to us.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
16 nov. 2021 à 18 h 11
#15
Sabres fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 4,723
Mentions "j'aime": 2,958
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
what does Buffalo need most? and who would you be willing to part with that’s a RW RH shot?
i get that i made a mistake on this one and Quinn is to you guys what Eklund is to us.

We don’t have any right hand shooting wingers available. We need all of them because we don’t really have any. As it is we converted Thompson from wing to center.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
16 nov. 2021 à 18 h 19
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,968
Mentions "j'aime": 4,538
Quoting: Tjm220
We don’t have any right hand shooting wingers available. We need all of them because we don’t really have any. As it is we converted Thompson from wing to center.

ok so Buffalo just isn’t a good trade partner for us then!
good luck i feel like if you guys work hard the next two drafts you’ll be better sooner than later.
Tjm220 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2021 à 9 h 59
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,348
Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
ok i did say i wasn’t sure on Quinn ceiling or how coveted he is!
we need a RW capable of playing top 6 in a year or two if not sooner, if you have a counter offer please, otherwise your just here to scoff at people, that what facebook is for.
You need to ignore Little.
He and Shibbal know everything and facts will never convince them other wise.
You were trying to have an intelligent conversation only to met with an insult.
As stated above currently the ONLY top six RH RW under contract is Tuch.
I suppose Thompson could move the wing if Krebs pans out.
If you were interested with LW on the other hand Buffalo may be convinced to move one, but you have already stated that does not help the Sharks.
Merkley would fit into the Sabre time line, on the other hand check out Laaksonen performance in Rochester.
He is only a year older than Merkley and has 24 AHL pts in 39 games. I think he could be Buffalo's next RHD.
I am thrilled that Buffalo has not brought him into the NHL look what they did to Ristolainen bringing him up too soon.
GMTD et Bostonbruins a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2021 à 11 h 36
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 10,968
Mentions "j'aime": 4,538
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
You need to ignore Little.
He and Shibbal know everything and facts will never convince them other wise.
You were trying to have an intelligent conversation only to met with an insult.
As stated above currently the ONLY top six RH RW under contract is Tuch.
I suppose Thompson could move the wing if Krebs pans out.
If you were interested with LW on the other hand Buffalo may be convinced to move one, but you have already stated that does not help the Sharks.
Merkley would fit into the Sabre time line, on the other hand check out Laaksonen performance in Rochester.
He is only a year older than Merkley and has 24 AHL pts in 39 games. I think he could be Buffalo's next RHD.
I am thrilled that Buffalo has not brought him into the NHL look what they did to Ristolainen bringing him up too soon.


i like you your logical on prospects! sharks have ruined tons of D prospects bringing them up too soon. sharks have been smart with Merkley taking their time with him! they did the same with Dahlin and it’s paying off well! this is also why the sharks are being patient with Eklund.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2021 à 14 h 8
#19
Sabres are elite
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,979
Mentions "j'aime": 3,299
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Quinn is far better than Merkley at offense AND defense. The 2nd is not the gap between the two.


Quinn and Merkley are different players. yes Quin would be better offensively as Quin is a RW and Merkley is a RD.
Merkley is a future power play QB who can make a team better but his D is suspect, however he isn't as bad as I thought in the D zone, just look at that buffalo sharks game a few games back.

I only counter offered because you guys were looking at trading a wing for a D man in this ACGM and I thought this was a better fit than the initial post.
what would you counter with? we badly need a RW for our top 6.[/quote]

I would say you are very optimistic about Merkleys potential. We already have 2 power play QBs on D with Dahlin and Power. I don’t have a counter because the Sabres are in no position to trade away forward prospects. If you need wingers, Montreal would be the team to trade with.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage