SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

hawks

Créé par: leafs_and_devils
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 16 nov. 2021
Publié: 16 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
TOR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
4.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (MIN)
MIN
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
5.
TOR
  1. Motte, Tyler (225 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
VAN
  1. Engvall, Pierre
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de MIN
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $80 547 241 $0 $400 000 $952 759 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
874 125 $874 125 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
785 000 $785 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 nov. 2021 à 0 h 30
#1
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
These trades don’t make much sense
cooliny a aimé ceci.
16 nov. 2021 à 0 h 30
#2
Emotionally in 2018
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 9,290
Mentions "j'aime": 3,387
Can't lock yourself in to that Johnson deal if he's going to be on the fourth line. There are other options to fill a similar role that don't cost $3.5M
16 nov. 2021 à 0 h 31
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,061
Mentions "j'aime": 249
Quoting: krakowitz
Can't lock yourself in to that Johnson deal if he's going to be on the fourth line. There are other options to fill a similar role that don't cost $3.5M


i've been talking to a hawks fan for a while now. this is the deal we agreed on.
johnson also boosts the PP
16 nov. 2021 à 0 h 32
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,061
Mentions "j'aime": 249
Quoting: Juiceman
These trades don’t make much sense


which ones
16 nov. 2021 à 0 h 35
#5
BRUCE THERE IT IS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 1,645
Mentions "j'aime": 1,180
Quoting: leafs_and_devils
which ones


Why are Canucks giving up a higher pick for a worse player?
16 nov. 2021 à 0 h 39
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,061
Mentions "j'aime": 249
Quoting: cooliny
Why are Canucks giving up a higher pick for a worse player?


one is a rfa other is a ufa
16 nov. 2021 à 0 h 39
#7
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: leafs_and_devils
one is a rfa other is a ufa


Does not justify giving up the better pick and the better player
cooliny a aimé ceci.
16 nov. 2021 à 0 h 48
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 2,391
Mentions "j'aime": 554
Modifié 16 nov. 2021 à 1 h 13
If the Pens are in contention, I think they still take that trade.

The problem is, that 2023 3rd round pick is tied up with the Jeff Carter trade. It can’t be traded. Same with the the 2022 3rd.

You see the little “*” by the Pens 2023 3rd. If u click that, it tells you the same thing.
16 nov. 2021 à 1 h 55
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,061
Mentions "j'aime": 249
Quoting: LetsGoPens69
If the Pens are in contention, I think they still take that trade.

The problem is, that 2023 3rd round pick is tied up with the Jeff Carter trade. It can’t be traded. Same with the the 2022 3rd.

You see the little “*” by the Pens 2023 3rd. If u click that, it tells you the same thing.


ill take the 2024 then smile
LetsGoPens69 a aimé ceci.
16 nov. 2021 à 2 h 16
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 2,391
Mentions "j'aime": 554
Modifié 16 nov. 2021 à 3 h 4
Quoting: leafs_and_devils
ill take the 2024 then smile


I don’t really think u or I have a say in it. But good deal, I guess..

But I do think you might undervaluing Holl though. Everything I’ve read says the Leafs are asking for a lot.

I guess a 3rd and a 5th is good value and might be considered a lot. But reading the stuff out there, I was thinking they were trying to get a late 1st from a contender or maybe even a prospect too.

And they might get it at the deadline. It wouldn’t surprise me. Defensive D-man are valued in the NHL in to contenders at the deadline.

https://www.yardbarker.com/nhl/articles/penguins_might_see_solution_in_trading_for_maple_leafs_justin_holl/s1_16454_36383813
16 nov. 2021 à 16 h 43
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,665
Mentions "j'aime": 10,312
The hawks would probably do that. This probably favors the Hawks more immediately, but could definitely reverse in favor very easily. I personally think the Hawks should be looking for a top 6 RW before they look at another LW. But Kerfoot would still be a nice addition and Kral seems pretty promising. The hawks have too many floaters and not enough people in solidified roles. So this helps them solidify the LW more and get rid of some redundancies.

As for what the Leafs would be recieving, I feel like the Hawks don't have the proper personnel to compliment and utilize Johnson properly but he can absolutely still be a successful and productive player in the NHL if he were. Alex Nylander is more technically skilled than his brother and if he can get things going in the NHL, will be a very promising player. Strome is kind of the same. He has a lot of upside (probably more than Kerfoot) that either hasn't been utilized properly, hasn't quite blossomed at the NHL level yet, or (more likely) a combination of both. Most of the upside of what the Leafs would be receiving is completely speculative at this point. And I think if they really want to be buyers and go for a cup this year, there are probably better options for them. Maybe not options with as much long term certainty considering their cap situation. But better options for winning right now.
leafs_and_devils a aimé ceci.
16 nov. 2021 à 23 h 53
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,061
Mentions "j'aime": 249
Quoting: Garak
The hawks would probably do that. This probably favors the Hawks more immediately, but could definitely reverse in favor very easily. I personally think the Hawks should be looking for a top 6 RW before they look at another LW. But Kerfoot would still be a nice addition and Kral seems pretty promising. The hawks have too many floaters and not enough people in solidified roles. So this helps them solidify the LW more and get rid of some redundancies.

As for what the Leafs would be recieving, I feel like the Hawks don't have the proper personnel to compliment and utilize Johnson properly but he can absolutely still be a successful and productive player in the NHL if he were. Alex Nylander is more technically skilled than his brother and if he can get things going in the NHL, will be a very promising player. Strome is kind of the same. He has a lot of upside (probably more than Kerfoot) that either hasn't been utilized properly, hasn't quite blossomed at the NHL level yet, or (more likely) a combination of both. Most of the upside of what the Leafs would be receiving is completely speculative at this point. And I think if they really want to be buyers and go for a cup this year, there are probably better options for them. Maybe not options with as much long term certainty considering their cap situation. But better options for winning right now.


i'd agree there's better options, but that comes at a steep price. this gives us some flexibility and doesn't affect the farm system too much. kral will be good but he'll never crack the leafs roster. this gives the leafs 3 nice complimentary players (which we need more than more star players at high contracts and trade costs) that can fill in a lot of holes for the team.
johnson fills in a HUGE slot on PP2, currently taken up by ritchie. nylander/strome can replace engvall for the other.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage