SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

couple ideas for a retool pls critique in comments

Créé par: nhn1405
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 15 nov. 2021
Publié: 15 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Lysell, Fabian
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
BOS
  1. Miller, J.T. (2 600 000 $ retained)
  2. Motte, Tyler
2.
3.
OTT
  1. Myers, Tyler
Détails additionnels:
myers is having a bit of a renaissance year and the sens are desperate on defense... are they stupid enough to do this?

will add a sweetener to make it work
4.
VAN
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (TBL)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
TBL
  1. Halák, Jaroslav (750 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de BOS
Logo de WPG
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de TBL
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de TBL
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $77 133 993 $648 780 $1 932 500 $4 366 007 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
886 667 $886 667 $
AD
RFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 nov. 2021 à 19 h 19
#1
Tintin over 1122
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 15,925
Mentions "j'aime": 10,165
You would probably have to add on the avs trade
15 nov. 2021 à 19 h 19
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Unless boeser comes with an extension and isn’t asking for a 7.5m aav like his QO then this is plausible, avs decline in seaason but offseason would discuss it

Hamonic as 0 value and his contract is awful,
csick a aimé ceci.
15 nov. 2021 à 19 h 22
#3
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,153
Mentions "j'aime": 23,514
Quoting: coga16
Unless boeser comes with an extension and isn’t asking for a 7.5m aav like his QO then this is plausible, avs decline in seaason but offseason would discuss it

Hamonic as 0 value and his contract is awful,


I think it’s a very good summer trade for the AVS. I can’t see why Vancouver would want another LD. Didn’t the whole Nate Schmidt on the right side fail?
15 nov. 2021 à 19 h 24
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,884
Mentions "j'aime": 11,896
What an awful deal for Ottawa. Holden is totally fine and Sanford has been one of Ottawa's better bottom six guys so far. Both are on one year deals and will fetch returns st the deadline. It doesn't come close to making sense for them to move those two for a complete boat anchor contract
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
15 nov. 2021 à 19 h 24
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
benning is the only GM who thinks the solution to terrible defense is to add another bad defenseman with a boat anchor of a contract, you can keep myers
sensonfire et Newgod77 a aimé ceci.
15 nov. 2021 à 19 h 26
#6
Dekesaladekes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,823
Mentions "j'aime": 1,025
i doubt bruins move lysell
15 nov. 2021 à 19 h 28
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: csick
I think it’s a very good summer trade for the AVS. I can’t see why Vancouver would want another LD. Didn’t the whole Nate Schmidt on the right side fail?


No clue why Vancouver does it but if they talked this swap in the offseason I think it’s plausible
csick a aimé ceci.
15 nov. 2021 à 19 h 31
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Alfie11
benning is the only GM who thinks the solution to terrible defense is to add another bad defenseman with a boat anchor of a contract, you can keep myers


Are you calling girard a bad dman with a boat anchor if a contract? I mean come on now, are you confused with another dman?
15 nov. 2021 à 19 h 34
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,650
Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
Boston not trading Lysell. Studnicka or Beecher maybe.
Heyhowareya37 a aimé ceci.
15 nov. 2021 à 19 h 44
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,067
Mentions "j'aime": 427
Miller is a good fit in BOS, just dont see them moving Lysell - they need to keep some high end talent in the prospect pool.
15 nov. 2021 à 19 h 46
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,525
Mentions "j'aime": 3,373
Modifié 15 nov. 2021 à 19 h 56
Quoting: coga16
Are you calling girard a bad dman with a boat anchor if a contract? I mean come on now, are you confused with another dman?


I believe the person is talking about Myers and how they actively signed him to that awful bloated contract.

What about JTM to Colorado? Not for Girard but all futures? Could be a nice fit, and the contract length is good.
15 nov. 2021 à 19 h 51
#12
Rutta 4ever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,539
Mentions "j'aime": 3,913
Absolutely zero need for Tampa to trade for a goalie.
15 nov. 2021 à 22 h 37
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 2,242
Mentions "j'aime": 983
Holden and Sanford have been solid this year. Both on expiring deals and can be resigned if needed. Don’t think taking on an extra two years of Myers at 6m is worthwhile. Pass.
15 nov. 2021 à 23 h 20
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,256
Mentions "j'aime": 8,893
Quoting: csick
I think it’s a very good summer trade for the AVS. I can’t see why Vancouver would want another LD. Didn’t the whole Nate Schmidt on the right side fail?


Except myself and lot of people think Girard plays better on the right. When he is paired with Toews he plays right.
csick a aimé ceci.
15 nov. 2021 à 23 h 21
#15
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,153
Mentions "j'aime": 23,514
Quoting: Xqb15a
Except myself and lot of people think Girard plays better on the right. When he is paired with Toews he plays right.


I don’t think it’s that big of an issue but a lot of coaches don’t like that
16 nov. 2021 à 9 h 3
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,256
Mentions "j'aime": 8,893
Quoting: csick
I don’t think it’s that big of an issue but a lot of coaches don’t like that


Personally I don’t think it should be an issue at all, if a guy can do it a guy can do it. I get the old school thinking about it I just don’t completely buy it.
csick a aimé ceci.
16 nov. 2021 à 12 h 3
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,457
Mentions "j'aime": 3,700
Quoting: coga16
Are you calling girard a bad dman with a boat anchor if a contract? I mean come on now, are you confused with another dman?


I am trying to figure out how you managed to relate this to your team...

Quoting: TheBoyDuddus
Holden and Sanford have been solid this year. Both on expiring deals and can be resigned if needed. Don’t think taking on an extra two years of Myers at 6m is worthwhile. Pass.


Any trade for Myers to Ottawa idea has Nikita Zaitsev going the other way...
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage