SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Fauteuil - DG

Copying

Créé par: Chabotrrorr
Équipe: 2021-22 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 14 nov. 2021
Publié: 14 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
MIN
  1. Hertl, Tomas (2 812 500 $ retained)
SJS
  1. Lambos, Carson
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (MIN)
2.
SEA
    Waivers
    3.
    DAL
      Waivers
      Rachats de contrats
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2022
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de MIN
      2023
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      2024
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de MIN
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2381 500 000 $78 140 586 $0 $0 $3 359 414 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
      AG
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      2 812 500 $2 812 500 $
      C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
      AD, AG
      NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
      C
      UFA - 8
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      5 100 000 $5 100 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      725 000 $725 000 $
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      750 000 $750 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      900 000 $900 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      917 831 $917 831 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
      DG
      NMC
      UFA - 7
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      7 575 000 $7 575 000 $
      DD
      NMC
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      725 000 $725 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      DG/DD
      NMC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
      DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
      G
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
      DG/DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      900 000 $900 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      850 000 $850 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Équipe de réserve
      Logo de Kraken de Seattle
      850 000 $850 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
      AG, C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      894 167 $894 167 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
      C
      RFA - 4
      Logo de Stars de Dallas
      750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
      C, AG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      840 000 $840 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
      AD, C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Wild du Minnesota
      750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
      DG
      UFA - 2

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      14 nov. 2021 à 12 h 44
      #1
      Hop on the Slaftrain
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2019
      Messages: 16,165
      Mentions "j'aime": 20,486
      Kulikov has been significantly better than Soucy, why pay a 2nd + 4th to downgrade?
      14 nov. 2021 à 13 h 0
      #2
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2021
      Messages: 1,907
      Mentions "j'aime": 449
      Don't know where you think a rental like Tomas h will get you anywhere close to this package. Minnesota will not have any interest neither will any team. When was the last time a rental has gotten a package that is two 1st round picks? No, MINNESOTA will wait to sign him in free agency. You will get a 1st round pick and b prospect from championship team
      - your 3 proposal are just bad for wild. Dmitry has been better than Carson soucy.
      - In what world is Carson soucy worth a 2bd round pick and more? Haha
      14 nov. 2021 à 13 h 2
      #3
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2021
      Messages: 1,907
      Mentions "j'aime": 449
      Quoting: SevenLeg
      Kulikov has been significantly better than Soucy, why pay a 2nd + 4th to downgrade?


      Wild fan didn't make this
      14 nov. 2021 à 13 h 7
      #4
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2020
      Messages: 1,673
      Mentions "j'aime": 411
      Quoting: SevenLeg
      Kulikov has been significantly better than Soucy, why pay a 2nd + 4th to downgrade?


      Quoting: CAPDumba
      Don't know where you think a rental like Tomas h will get you anywhere close to this package. Minnesota will not have any interest neither will any team. When was the last time a rental has gotten a package that is two 1st round picks? No, MINNESOTA will wait to sign him in free agency. You will get a 1st round pick and b prospect from championship team
      - your 3 proposal are just bad for wild. Dmitry has been better than Carson soucy.
      - In what world is Carson soucy worth a 2bd round pick and more? Haha


      I'll change it. I haven't watched the Wild this season, so I'll keep Kulikov instead of Soucy.
      14 nov. 2021 à 15 h 55
      #5
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2021
      Messages: 2,660
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,906
      I’m not gonna rehash the Hertl argument, but why exactly are we grabbing those guys off waivers?

      Also idk if you care or not, but the bottom 6 isn’t accurate to what they run.
      14 nov. 2021 à 16 h 2
      #6
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 8,104
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,602
      I think it’s pretty fair value in the Hertl trade. As a sharks fan, I would prefer a Center prospect like Marat. Seems most refuse to trade Boldy and Rossi
      14 nov. 2021 à 16 h 7
      #7
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2021
      Messages: 1,907
      Mentions "j'aime": 449
      Quoting: glarson17
      I think it’s pretty fair value in the Hertl trade. As a sharks fan, I would prefer a Center prospect like Marat. Seems most refuse to trade Boldy and Rossi


      Tomas a rental no disrespect isn't getting a 1st round pick and a prospect from not a contender in Minnesota. No team which isn't a championship contender not paying that for a rental
      14 nov. 2021 à 17 h 2
      #8
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 8,104
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,602
      Quoting: CAPDumba
      Tomas a rental no disrespect isn't getting a 1st round pick and a prospect from not a contender in Minnesota. No team which isn't a championship contender not paying that for a rental


      Why is Minnesota not a contender? I’m sure think he will get at least that from whoever makes a trade for him especially with half retention.
      14 nov. 2021 à 17 h 40
      #9
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2021
      Messages: 1,907
      Mentions "j'aime": 449
      Quoting: glarson17
      Why is Minnesota not a contender? I’m sure think he will get at least that from whoever makes a trade for him especially with half retention.


      Because Minnesota isn't a championship team at all k, and has Done nothing to prove they are nothing more than a 1st round team! MIN certainly ain't giving up a potential lottery 1st round pick inna stud draft and an A prospect
      14 nov. 2021 à 18 h 24
      #10
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 8,104
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,602
      Quoting: CAPDumba
      Because Minnesota isn't a championship team at all k, and has Done nothing to prove they are nothing more than a 1st round team! MIN certainly ain't giving up a potential lottery 1st round pick inna stud draft and an A prospect


      They are first in the Central…
      14 nov. 2021 à 18 h 54
      #11
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2021
      Messages: 1,907
      Mentions "j'aime": 449
      Quoting: glarson17
      They are first in the Central…


      Their actually aren't. Jets are. You should look at wild roster. Literally wild haven't played against anyone. Wild have 1c. They have only two good I guess superstar which hasn't produced, so they aren't a contender
      14 nov. 2021 à 19 h 19
      #12
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 8,104
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,602
      Quoting: CAPDumba
      Their actually aren't. Jets are. You should look at wild roster. Literally wild haven't played against anyone. Wild have 1c. They have only two good I guess superstar which hasn't produced, so they aren't a contender


      I didn’t know 19 points is more than 20, interesting.
      14 nov. 2021 à 19 h 24
      #13
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2021
      Messages: 1,907
      Mentions "j'aime": 449
      Quoting: glarson17
      I didn’t know 19 points is more than 20, interesting.


      Again, yoi clearly aren't willing to understand my point. Right now wild have played more with jets being one point behind. It really doesn't matter because wild aren't sacrifice their future with having what you can call two superstar doing nothing and just one good C on the roster
      14 nov. 2021 à 19 h 36
      #14
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 8,104
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,602
      Quoting: CAPDumba
      Again, yoi clearly aren't willing to understand my point. Right now wild have played more with jets being one point behind. It really doesn't matter because wild aren't sacrifice their future with having what you can call two superstar doing nothing and just one good C on the roster


      Giving up 1 of 3 good C prospects and a later first isn’t sacrificing their future. They would still have Boldy, Rossi, Beckman, Addison, Lambos and Wallstedt in the pipeline. Not to mention Kaprizov and Erickson Ek who are only 24. They have a bright future.
      14 nov. 2021 à 20 h 18
      #15
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2021
      Messages: 1,907
      Mentions "j'aime": 449
      Quoting: glarson17
      Giving up 1 of 3 good C prospects and a later first isn’t sacrificing their future. They would still have Boldy, Rossi, Beckman, Addison, Lambos and Wallstedt in the pipeline. Not to mention Kaprizov and Erickson Ek who are only 24. They have a bright future.


      Boldy isn't a c,, so you are wrong Clearly team like Tampa and Vegas could do that. No Minnesota for a rental
      14 nov. 2021 à 20 h 40
      #16
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 8,104
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,602
      Quoting: CAPDumba
      Boldy isn't a c,, so you are wrong Clearly team like Tampa and Vegas could do that. No Minnesota for a rental


      Excuse me, two C prospects. He is still a top prospect none the less and all the other players I mentioned are great as well. I think I proved my point.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage