SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

New York Rangers

Créé par: mikeblue
Équipe: 2021-22 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 12 nov. 2021
Publié: 12 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Chiarot, Ben
  2. Poehling, Ryan
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CAR)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (ANA)
2.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de STL
Logo de ANA
Logo de CAR
Logo de NYR
Logo de WPG
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2023
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2024
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $74 379 802 $0 $4 700 000 $7 120 198 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 641 667 $3 641 667 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
850 833 $850 833 $
AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 666 667 $5 666 667 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 nov. 2021 à 20 h 52
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,629
Mentions "j'aime": 1,515
The Rangers are truly fortunate you are not their GM.
HOCKEYBOY448 et Drakin1978 a aimé ceci.
12 nov. 2021 à 20 h 53
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,556
Mentions "j'aime": 3,278
I’m confused by the Sabres deal. We’re loaded with young potential top 4 defenseman. Tuch is nice, but subtracting Laf and Chytil doesn’t seem worth it.
12 nov. 2021 à 20 h 53
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,556
Mentions "j'aime": 3,278
I’m confused by the Sabres deal. We’re loaded with young potential top 4 defenseman. Tuch is nice, but subtracting Laf and Chytil doesn’t seem worth it.
12 nov. 2021 à 20 h 57
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 1,605
The habs have 0 use for Hajek and Chiarot's value > Kravstov's value so getting multiple 3rds makes no sense.
12 nov. 2021 à 21 h 3
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,556
Mentions "j'aime": 3,278
I’m confused by the Sabres deal. We’re loaded with young potential top 4 defenseman. Tuch is nice, but subtracting Laf and Chytil doesn’t seem worth it.
12 nov. 2021 à 21 h 4
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,556
Mentions "j'aime": 3,278
My bad dude, my internet was bugging and I pressed submit a few times and it posted my comment a few times.
Radu47 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
12 nov. 2021 à 21 h 49
#7
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 7,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
Quoting: Black61
The habs have 0 use for Hajek and Chiarot's value > Kravstov's value so getting multiple 3rds makes no sense.


It's less than a year of chiarot

Vs.

Kravstov's entire cost controlled prime
mikeblue et NYR1983 a aimé ceci.
12 nov. 2021 à 21 h 52
#8
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 7,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
The big trade there is really neat

I think it's too lopsided for Buffalo

But it's nice to see an original compelling trade
12 nov. 2021 à 22 h 18
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 1,605
Quoting: Radu47
It's less than a year of chiarot

Vs.

Kravstov's entire cost controlled prime


So what? Are you saying Malkin is less valuable than Victor Mete? Just because someone is younger does not mean they have more value. Kravstov was replacement level last season and didnt make the team this year. Also refuses to report which lowers his value. He is worth maybe a 2nd round pick.
12 nov. 2021 à 22 h 27
#10
Démarrer sujet
mikeblue
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 46
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
I’m confused by the Sabres deal. We’re loaded with young potential top 4 defenseman. Tuch is nice, but subtracting Laf and Chytil doesn’t seem worth it.


Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
I’m confused by the Sabres deal. We’re loaded with young potential top 4 defenseman. Tuch is nice, but subtracting Laf and Chytil doesn’t seem worth it.


Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
I’m confused by the Sabres deal. We’re loaded with young potential top 4 defenseman. Tuch is nice, but subtracting Laf and Chytil doesn’t seem worth it.


Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
I’m confused by the Sabres deal. We’re loaded with young potential top 4 defenseman. Tuch is nice, but subtracting Laf and Chytil doesn’t seem worth it.


Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
I’m confused by the Sabres deal. We’re loaded with young potential top 4 defenseman. Tuch is nice, but subtracting Laf and Chytil doesn’t seem worth it.


Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
I’m confused by the Sabres deal. We’re loaded with young potential top 4 defenseman. Tuch is nice, but subtracting Laf and Chytil doesn’t seem worth it.


Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
I’m confused by the Sabres deal. We’re loaded with young potential top 4 defenseman. Tuch is nice, but subtracting Laf and Chytil doesn’t seem worth it.


Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
I’m confused by the Sabres deal. We’re loaded with young potential top 4 defenseman. Tuch is nice, but subtracting Laf and Chytil doesn’t seem worth it.


Quoting: Black61
The habs have 0 use for Hajek and Chiarot's value > Kravstov's value so getting multiple 3rds makes no sense.


Quoting: Black61
The habs have 0 use for Hajek and Chiarot's value > Kravstov's value so getting multiple 3rds makes no sense.


Quoting: delneggs
The Rangers are truly fortunate you are not their GM.


Panarin & Kreider - LWs with large extended contracts who do not like to play out of position.
Lafreniere - should not be slotted at 3rd line for next 5 yrs. and currently under performing. Rangers should trade him while he still has great value.
Alex Tuch - perfect big power RW who fits on 1st line and played under Galant.
mikeblue - yea, I should be the Rangers GM. Watching this team for 55 yrs. How you doing?
12 nov. 2021 à 23 h 33
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,629
Mentions "j'aime": 1,515
Quoting: mikeblue
Panarin & Kreider - LWs with large extended contracts who do not like to play out of position.
Lafreniere - should not be slotted at 3rd line for next 5 yrs. and currently under performing. Rangers should trade him while he still has great value.
Alex Tuch - perfect big power RW who fits on 1st line and played under Galant.
mikeblue - yea, I should be the Rangers GM. Watching this team for 55 yrs. How you doing?


Trade their 1st ever #1 overall pick in only his second year.....pure genius. I can see you have learned much from watching the Rangers for so long.
NYR1983 et HOCKEYBOY448 a aimé ceci.
12 nov. 2021 à 23 h 56
#12
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
Quoting: Radu47
It's less than a year of chiarot

Vs.

Kravstov's entire cost controlled prime


The way I see it it’s essentially a 2nd and 3 3rds for Kravtsov. (Since Hajek is useless for Montréal)

Which might be close to even if Kravtsov is willing to play for you, but if you don’t have room on your NHL roster makes 0 sense at all.
13 nov. 2021 à 1 h 41
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 7,136
Mentions "j'aime": 3,156
What happened to Lafreniere being “untouchable” though?

No thanks from the Sabres imo
13 nov. 2021 à 5 h 54
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,928
Mentions "j'aime": 2,670
Sabres easily decline
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
13 nov. 2021 à 7 h 57
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,348
Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
I’m confused by the Sabres deal. We’re loaded with young potential top 4 defenseman. Tuch is nice, but subtracting Laf and Chytil doesn’t seem worth it.
Quoting: Radu47
...I think it's too lopsided for Buffalo...
@SalamiCheese
LOL quite the trade with Buffalo.
Ranger and Buffalo fans dis-like it.
The return to Buffalo punches three tickets, center, winger and RHD.
I was not sold on Cozens until last night when he was matched against McDavid nearly all of the time and other the PP shut down the leagues top center.
Tuch was the jewel of the Eichel trade.
I doubt he will be traded.
I think Buffalo will rather keep Tuch and Cozens, but it is a close call IMO.
Buffalo passes.
GMTD et Bostonbruins a aimé ceci.
13 nov. 2021 à 10 h 36
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 430
Mentions "j'aime": 96
i think Nils might be the best player in that trade.
HOCKEYBOY448 a aimé ceci.
13 nov. 2021 à 13 h 59
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 6,200
Mentions "j'aime": 2,506
Quoting: Black61
The habs have 0 use for Hajek and Chiarot's value > Kravstov's value so getting multiple 3rds makes no sense.


We have too many D and Chiarot doesn’t exactly upgrade our D. You guys need him desperately and won’t get what you value him at. That trade should just be wiped clean.
HOCKEYBOY448 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage