SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

When Backstrom and Oshie are back

Créé par: grobkenwood
Équipe: 2021-22 Capitals de Washington
Date de création initiale: 10 nov. 2021
Publié: 10 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
WSH
  1. Gudbranson, Erik
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de WSH
Logo de WPG
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2023
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de CGY
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2024
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $66 568 761 $472 927 $165 000 $14 931 239 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 166 667 $5 166 667 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 200 000 $9 200 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 415 000 $2 415 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Capitals de Washington
791 667 $791 667 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
716 667 $716 667 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
950 000 $950 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 nov. 2021 à 11 h 3
#1
Caps fan idk why
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 11,266
Mentions "j'aime": 4,354
Washington has terrible wing depth... i dont see how this benefits us at all
10 nov. 2021 à 11 h 7
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 676
Mentions "j'aime": 168
The last thing we need is Erik Gubrandson, even if sprong gets pushed out you keep him because it gives us a great extra wing to have incase of injury, Also Schultz has been amazing, theres 0 chance we get rid of our PP2 Qb
10 nov. 2021 à 11 h 7
#3
NHL Insider
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 1,997
Mentions "j'aime": 709
Gudbranson is terrible. I'd go for someone else if we need cap relief
10 nov. 2021 à 11 h 16
#4
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,263
Mentions "j'aime": 10,607
Flames have 1 mill in cap room. We would be over the cap with this trade
10 nov. 2021 à 11 h 33
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,170
Mentions "j'aime": 903
Quoting: NARC311
Gudbranson is terrible. I'd go for someone else if we need cap relief


Worth watching him this year if that's your thought. Been rock solid on the back end.
10 nov. 2021 à 11 h 57
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 8,009
Mentions "j'aime": 3,223
Quoting: yycofred
Worth watching him this year if that's your thought. Been rock solid on the back end.


Relative to his teammates:
-2.66 Expected Goal%
+0.04 Scoring Chance%
-1.70 High Danger Scoring Chance%

So still pretty bad.
10 nov. 2021 à 12 h 18
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,170
Mentions "j'aime": 903
Quoting: ClockReads2113
Relative to his teammates:
-2.66 Expected Goal%
+0.04 Scoring Chance%
-1.70 High Danger Scoring Chance%

So still pretty bad.


I mean you can take as many numbers as you like and think what you like, in no way does it make what you're saying correct. Been a perfect bottom pair guy, plays 15 - 20 minutes a night, rotation partners giving guys sheltered minutes, less than a 2M cap hit. Not much else you could ask for on a bottom pairing.
10 nov. 2021 à 12 h 50
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,283
Mentions "j'aime": 19,526
Quoting: NARC311
Gudbranson is terrible. I'd go for someone else if we need cap relief


Gudbranson has definitely not been terrible this year
10 nov. 2021 à 13 h 56
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 162
Mentions "j'aime": 48
Quoting: TM11
The last thing we need is Erik Gubrandson, even if sprong gets pushed out you keep him because it gives us a great extra wing to have incase of injury, Also Schultz has been amazing, theres 0 chance we get rid of our PP2 Qb


2 points in 12 games is far from amazing. Especially with powerplay time and 64% offensive zone starts.
10 nov. 2021 à 16 h 6
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 81
Mentions "j'aime": 41
This trade makes Washington worse.
NoVaSpartan a aimé ceci.
10 nov. 2021 à 17 h 48
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 676
Mentions "j'aime": 168
Quoting: grobkenwood
2 points in 12 games is far from amazing. Especially with powerplay time and 64% offensive zone starts.


Have you been watching the games though, hes amazing at moving the puck out of the zone and has been excellent at defense
10 nov. 2021 à 17 h 58
#12
Beanmachine
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,484
Mentions "j'aime": 497
I was very skeptical when we signed Gudbranson but he has so far been very impressive as a bottom pairing D - solid, big, excellent on the PK and not making any glaring mistakes. All for less than $2M - exactly what is needed in a 5/6 D. We will be keeping him thanks.
11 nov. 2021 à 9 h 1
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 162
Mentions "j'aime": 48
Quoting: TM11
Have you been watching the games though, hes amazing at moving the puck out of the zone and has been excellent at defense


Yes, I watch the games. He's being paid 4 million to be the #6 defenseman. He has 1 goal and 1 assist. I've seen nothing amazing.
11 nov. 2021 à 9 h 19
#14
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 5,288
Mentions "j'aime": 5,737
Quoting: grobkenwood
Yes, I watch the games. He's being paid 4 million to be the #6 defenseman. He has 1 goal and 1 assist. I've seen nothing amazing.


Then you haven't actually watched. Schultz doesn't have the points, but has been rock solid defensively with TVR and creates some good chances. Also, it isn't right to classify him as a 6D, Laviolette has used the D pretty fairly imo. There is no reason to send not only him but a promising young winger in Sprong away when you have free cap relief chances just by dumping Kempny and a 3rd or 4th to a team like Arizona. Not to mention the return here isn't what Washington needs, it's not enough value for Schultz and Sprong together and Gudbranson isn't what the Caps would ask for anyway as they could slide TVR back to RD and put Cholo at LD.
12 nov. 2021 à 14 h 27
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 676
Mentions "j'aime": 168
Quoting: grobkenwood
Yes, I watch the games. He's being paid 4 million to be the #6 defenseman. He has 1 goal and 1 assist. I've seen nothing amazing.


#6???? hes our 3rd best defeseman this year and was our 2nd best last year idk what your watching
15 nov. 2021 à 12 h 26
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 162
Mentions "j'aime": 48
Quoting: TM11
#6???? hes our 3rd best defeseman this year and was our 2nd best last year idk what your watching


He is #6 in TOI and #6 in points among defenseman. That makes him the #6 defenseman. Also he doesn't kill penalties and has 1 powerplay point in 20+ minutes of ice time. #6 all day.
15 nov. 2021 à 22 h 30
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 676
Mentions "j'aime": 168
Quoting: grobkenwood
He is #6 in TOI and #6 in points among defenseman. That makes him the #6 defenseman. Also he doesn't kill penalties and has 1 powerplay point in 20+ minutes of ice time. #6 all day.


Mackenzie Weeger is 4th on Florida in points this year and HAS 0 PP Points, Chychrun is tied with 3 D for 2 points on his team, and Essa Lindell has 1 point. these are all good D that are having slow starts point wise but playing well. Im not gonna have you tell me Nick Jensen, Ferhevary, or TVR (arguably) are playing better than him.
16 nov. 2021 à 8 h 22
#18
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 5,288
Mentions "j'aime": 5,737
Quoting: TM11
Mackenzie Weeger is 4th on Florida in points this year and HAS 0 PP Points, Chychrun is tied with 3 D for 2 points on his team, and Essa Lindell has 1 point. these are all good D that are having slow starts point wise but playing well. Im not gonna have you tell me Nick Jensen, Ferhevary, or TVR (arguably) are playing better than him.


Quoting: grobkenwood
2 points in 12 games is far from amazing. Especially with powerplay time and 64% offensive zone starts.


Per the Athletic:

Erik Gudbranson: -0.8 GSVA, Replacement level Player
vs
Martin Fehervary: 0.1 GSVA, Third Pairing Player
TVR + Schultz: both 0.6 GSVA, 2nd Pairing Player
Jensen: 1.2 GSVA, Top Pairing player
Orlov: 1.5 GSVA, Top pairing player
Carlson: 2.9 GSVA, Star Player

In addition to Jensen's stats, Money Puck also ranks Orlov-Jensen as one of the best D pairs in the league.

I don't use advanced stats often as I don't think they tell the whole story, but this is the best way to get my point across. Gudbranson is bad, I've watched Calgary games and I've been far from impressed, and the Capitals defense is better without him. Schultz, Fehervary, TVR, Jensen, Carlson, and Orlov are all far better than Gudbranson, and I certainly wouldn't trade Sprong, let alone Sprong and Schultz for him.
16 nov. 2021 à 18 h 11
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 676
Mentions "j'aime": 168
Quoting: NoVaSpartan
Per the Athletic:

Erik Gudbranson: -0.8 GSVA, Replacement level Player
vs
Martin Fehervary: 0.1 GSVA, Third Pairing Player
TVR + Schultz: both 0.6 GSVA, 2nd Pairing Player
Jensen: 1.2 GSVA, Top Pairing player
Orlov: 1.5 GSVA, Top pairing player
Carlson: 2.9 GSVA, Star Player

In addition to Jensen's stats, Money Puck also ranks Orlov-Jensen as one of the best D pairs in the league.

I don't use advanced stats often as I don't think they tell the whole story, but this is the best way to get my point across. Gudbranson is bad, I've watched Calgary games and I've been far from impressed, and the Capitals defense is better without him. Schultz, Fehervary, TVR, Jensen, Carlson, and Orlov are all far better than Gudbranson, and I certainly wouldn't trade Sprong, let alone Sprong and Schultz for him.


Damn so the stats say again as I was saying Schultz is good and is just having a slow start point wise to the year, thanks
16 nov. 2021 à 20 h 37
#20
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 5,288
Mentions "j'aime": 5,737
Quoting: TM11
Damn so the stats say again as I was saying Schultz is good and is just having a slow start point wise to the year, thanks


Thought I deleted your quote, was only supposed to quote the other guy. My bad
TM11 a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2021 à 9 h 42
#21
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 162
Mentions "j'aime": 48
Fehervary with 22 games of experience in his NHL career and a cap hit under 800K , has more points in the last 2 games than Schultz has in 16 games played with 544 games of experience and a cap hit of 4 million. Forgive me for thinking Schultz should be producing more than he is. I don't think Schultz will be back next year anyways with RHD's Carlson, Jensen and Van Riemsdyk already signed.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage