SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ducks Fly

Créé par: mdevellano
Équipe: 2021-22 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 9 nov. 2021
Publié: 10 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Henrique, Adam (2 750 000 $ retained)
2.
3.
EDM
  1. Gibson, John (2 200 000 $ retained)
4.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de NSH
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $59 698 528 $0 $4 430 000 $21 801 472 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 037 500 $2 037 500 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 500 000 $$2M)
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
822 500 $822 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
809 166 $809 166 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
DG
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 nov. 2021 à 8 h 25
#26
The right to Wright
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 871
Mentions "j'aime": 187
Quoting: mdevellano
Brutal for .. ducks or boston

Boston
15 nov. 2021 à 8 h 20
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,973
Mentions "j'aime": 7,731
Quoting: Connor_McJesus_97
The deal is fair for what Gibson brings. You have longterm goaltending with him for the duration of his contract. Exactly what we need. Tho I would not target him because we can’t afford him. But he has been good so far and deserves a decent package for it

So you think ignoring the past 2+ years data is prudent just because he's played well in the past 12 games?? That's not a great strategy.
15 nov. 2021 à 8 h 43
#28
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,973
Mentions "j'aime": 7,731
Quoting: Connor_McJesus_97
The deal is fair for what Gibson brings. You have longterm goaltending with him for the duration of his contract. Exactly what we need. Tho I would not target him because we can’t afford him. But he has been good so far and deserves a decent package for it

Here's my other concern with using just a 12 game sample size for Gibson:

2018-19
First 12 games: .935
Rest of season: .911 (46 games)

2019-20
First 12 games: .926
Rest of season: .899 (40 games)

2020-21
First 12 games: .923
Rest of season: .894 (23 games)

2021-22
First 12 games: .924
Rest if season: ________
18 nov. 2021 à 13 h 42
#29
The right to Wright
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 871
Mentions "j'aime": 187
Quoting: CD282
So you think ignoring the past 2+ years data is prudent just because he's played well in the past 12 games?? That's not a great strategy.


Quoting: CD282
Here's my other concern with using just a 12 game sample size for Gibson:

2018-19
First 12 games: .935
Rest of season: .911 (46 games)

2019-20
First 12 games: .926
Rest of season: .899 (40 games)

2020-21
First 12 games: .923
Rest of season: .894 (23 games)

2021-22
First 12 games: .924
Rest if season: ________

He plays in Anaheim for pete’s sake. Bring him in a new team that actually is good and he will return to former glory. I imagine a team like Avs would like him if they lose Kuemper in FA. Imagine him with that team. That is stuff that nightmares are made of!
18 nov. 2021 à 13 h 44
#30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,973
Mentions "j'aime": 7,731
Quoting: Connor_McJesus_97
He plays in Anaheim for pete’s sake. Bring him in a new team that actually is good and he will return to former glory. I imagine a team like Avs would like him if they lose Kuemper in FA. Imagine him with that team. That is stuff that nightmares are made of!

You do realize that the Oilers are worse defensively than the Ducks, right?
18 nov. 2021 à 14 h 6
#31
The right to Wright
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 871
Mentions "j'aime": 187
Quoting: CD282
You do realize that the Oilers are worse defensively than the Ducks, right?


They are actually doing fine this season. But with the best offence in the whole league you can play alot in the other zone at least
18 nov. 2021 à 14 h 21
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,973
Mentions "j'aime": 7,731
Quoting: Connor_McJesus_97
They are actually doing fine this season. But with the best offence in the whole league you can play alot in the other zone at least


Have you paid ANY attention to the Oilers this season? That's a serious question - they're 28th in the league for shots against and 29th for high danger chances and you think they're "doing fine"? The reason they're 11-4 is all down to offense and goaltending.
19 nov. 2021 à 8 h 25
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,973
Mentions "j'aime": 7,731
Quoting: Connor_McJesus_97
They are actually doing fine this season. But with the best offence in the whole league you can play alot in the other zone at least


Quoting: CD282
Have you paid ANY attention to the Oilers this season? That's a serious question - they're 28th in the league for shots against and 29th for high danger chances and you think they're "doing fine"? The reason they're 11-4 is all down to offense and goaltending.


Update: the Oilers are now 31st for shots against per 60.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage