SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Maples

Créé par: Theozler
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 9 nov. 2021
Publié: 9 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
TOR
  1. Girgensons, Zemgus
  2. Olofsson, Victor (1 500 000 $ retained)
BUF
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $80 888 116 $0 $400 000 $611 884 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 nov. 2021 à 16 h 9
#1
Tintin over 1122
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 15,925
Mentions "j'aime": 10,165
Maybe add a b prospect
Roysboy72 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
9 nov. 2021 à 16 h 16
#2
yippee
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 2,113
Mentions "j'aime": 2,171
This actually looks like a really good trade based on the needs of the teams involved. I think both sides would benefit, though the Sabres would likely want a sweetener added in, they are retaining salary after all.
capsfan2121 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
9 nov. 2021 à 16 h 17
#3
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,167
Mentions "j'aime": 8,984
Kerfoot has 0 value to Buffalo, and at this point theyll want to keep both of those players, Olofsson is RFA. Maybe if Toronto continues to underperform and that 1st is actually a decent shot at a good pick
sabres89 a aimé ceci.
9 nov. 2021 à 16 h 17
#4
Tintin over 1122
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 15,925
Mentions "j'aime": 10,165
Quoting: Roysboy72
This actually looks like a really good trade based on the needs of the teams involved. I think both sides would benefit, though the Sabres would likely want a sweetener added in, they are retaining salary after all.

Well said
9 nov. 2021 à 16 h 18
#5
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,167
Mentions "j'aime": 8,984
Quoting: Roysboy72
This actually looks like a really good trade based on the needs of the teams involved. I think both sides would benefit, though the Sabres would likely want a sweetener added in, they are retaining salary after all.


What do you think the Sabres needs are?
9 nov. 2021 à 16 h 19
#6
yippee
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 2,113
Mentions "j'aime": 2,171
Quoting: Shibbal18
Kerfoot has 0 value to Buffalo, and at this point theyll want to keep both of those players, Olofsson is RFA. Maybe if Toronto continues to underperform and that 1st is actually a decent shot at a good pick

I think Kerfoot and Girgensons are getting swapped for cap reasons. They're both the same age and pretty much the same caliber of player, so it works without changing the value all too much.
gretzkyghosts et capsfan2121 a aimé ceci.
9 nov. 2021 à 16 h 21
#7
yippee
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 2,113
Mentions "j'aime": 2,171
Quoting: Shibbal18
What do you think the Sabres needs are?

Picks, prospects. This trade would be better if Toronto added a decent prospect as a sweetener, and if they did I see this as a quality trade.
gretzkyghosts et capsfan2121 a aimé ceci.
9 nov. 2021 à 16 h 23
#8
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,167
Mentions "j'aime": 8,984
Quoting: Roysboy72
I think Kerfoot and Girgensons are getting swapped for cap reasons. They're both the same age and pretty much the same caliber of player, so it works without changing the value all too much.


Girgensons is beloved by the front office though, he is the Fred Jackson of the Sabres
Edit: I forgot to mention Coe College
VilleKoho, Dmaz026 et Roysboy72 a aimé ceci.
9 nov. 2021 à 16 h 26
#9
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,167
Mentions "j'aime": 8,984
Quoting: Roysboy72
Picks, prospects. This trade would be better if Toronto added a decent prospect as a sweetener, and if they did I see this as a quality trade.


If the Sabres were moving depth pieces or older players maybe, Olofsson is a 24 year old RFA, I dont see why they would want to get rid of him without replacing him. Trading Eichel doesnt signal a rebuild, he was lockerroom cancer, both sides are better off without him. The Sabres are loaded with prospects now, I dont see them moving rfas that are producing unless they are supplanted by an AHLer
Roysboy72 a aimé ceci.
9 nov. 2021 à 16 h 29
#10
yippee
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 2,113
Mentions "j'aime": 2,171
Quoting: Shibbal18
Girgensons is beloved by the front office though, he is the Fred Jackson of the Sabres

True, and he does have an A on his chest to show it, now that I think about it. Would a player like Tage Thompson be a suitable replacement then? I know he's younger, but maybe then Toronto would have to add some more value to counteract it.
9 nov. 2021 à 16 h 30
#11
yippee
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 2,113
Mentions "j'aime": 2,171
Quoting: Shibbal18
If the Sabres were moving depth pieces or older players maybe, Olofsson is a 24 year old RFA, I dont see why they would want to get rid of him without replacing him. Trading Eichel doesnt signal a rebuild, he was lockerroom cancer, both sides are better off without him. The Sabres are loaded with prospects now, I dont see them moving rfas that are producing unless they are supplanted by an AHLer

FYI Olofsson is 26 but I get what you mean
9 nov. 2021 à 16 h 33
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,348
Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
Quoting: capsfan2121
Maybe add a b prospect
Quoting: Roysboy72
This actually looks like a really good trade based on the needs of the teams involved. I think both sides would benefit, though the Sabres would likely want a sweetener added in, they are retaining salary after all.
You are both correct, the value change is very reasonable.
This is really a close call for Buffalo.
If Buffalo thinks they could compete next year, then IMO they would pass.
On the other hand if they think the rebuild is at least 3 years away, I could see them making this trade.
Make it TML 2022 2nd instead of 2023, and add the 2022 7th instead of "B" prospect.
Then Dubas could save on air fare, hotel rooms and meals while sitting out the 2022 draft entirely. (LOL)
@Roysboy72
"FYI Olofsson is 26 but I get what you mean"
I think will be a solid indication of how well he knows his own team
capsfan2121, Roysboy72, Bostonbruins and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
9 nov. 2021 à 16 h 34
#13
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,167
Mentions "j'aime": 8,984
Quoting: Roysboy72
True, and he does have an A on his chest to show it, now that I think about it. Would a player like Tage Thompson be a suitable replacement then? I know he's younger, but maybe then Toronto would have to add some more value to counteract it.


I think either Tage or Mittelstadt could be moved out by next season. Right now Tage has been pretty good for Buffalo while Mitts is hurt
Roysboy72 a aimé ceci.
9 nov. 2021 à 16 h 37
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,531
Mentions "j'aime": 819
ahhhh nooooo. were not moving olofsson right now, Ik the rebuild just begun but this will be a quick one, we already have the pieces, just need more support. Olofsson would be a no go
9 nov. 2021 à 16 h 43
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,506
Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
Quoting: Roysboy72
This actually looks like a really good trade based on the needs of the teams involved. I think both sides would benefit, though the Sabres would likely want a sweetener added in, they are retaining salary after all.


Cheers I think maybe Ollofson is a little bit underrated here, but I'd say the sabres want someone like NicRob instead of the first.
gretzkyghosts et Roysboy72 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage