SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If brad had a brain

Créé par: Flamecity
Équipe: 2021-22 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 4 nov. 2021
Publié: 4 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
VGK
  1. Monahan, Sean
  2. Ruzicka, Adam
  3. Välimäki, Juuso
  4. Zary, Connor
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
  6. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (FLA)
Détails additionnels:
20 games played 2nd pick conditions
2.
CGY
ARI
  1. Zadorov, Nikita
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $73 427 500 $0 $0 $8 072 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
912 500 $912 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
827 500 $827 500 $
AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 nov. 2021 à 18 h 45
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,295
I have no idea how Calgary couldn't beat that offer, Buffalo must either be extremely high on Tuch or Monahan wouldnt waive and they couldnt find a 3rd team
Flamecity et palhal a aimé ceci.
4 nov. 2021 à 18 h 47
#2
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,168
Mentions "j'aime": 8,989
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I have no idea how Calgary couldn't beat that offer, Buffalo must either be extremely high on Tuch or Monahan wouldnt waive and they couldnt find a 3rd team


Krebs > Zary
0 need > Valimaki
Ntc > Monahan
4 nov. 2021 à 18 h 48
#3
Démarrer sujet
Flamecity
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 357
Mentions "j'aime": 41
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I have no idea how Calgary couldn't beat that offer, Buffalo must either be extremely high on Tuch or Monahan wouldnt waive and they couldnt find a 3rd team


Fr Buffalo got fleeced and I think that first round pick is top 10 protected too
4 nov. 2021 à 18 h 49
#4
Démarrer sujet
Flamecity
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 357
Mentions "j'aime": 41
Quoting: Shibbal18
Krebs > Zary
0 need > Valimaki
Ntc > Monahan


Sub dube for valimaki
4 nov. 2021 à 18 h 49
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,295
Quoting: Shibbal18
Krebs > Zary
0 need > Valimaki
Ntc > Monahan


Im not talking about the trade above specifically. But Krebs vs Zary is highly debatable, and Monahan has a 10 team NTC only

I would have moved Coronato as well if push came to shove
Flamecity, Shibbal18 et soooonk a aimé ceci.
4 nov. 2021 à 18 h 51
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 6,464
Mentions "j'aime": 2,421
Treliving did that and Calgary doesn't win a Cup in 2 years he's looking for a new job.
4 nov. 2021 à 18 h 52
#7
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 7,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
All that truculence wears your brain down



Ugh
4 nov. 2021 à 18 h 53
#8
Démarrer sujet
Flamecity
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 357
Mentions "j'aime": 41
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
Treliving did that and Calgary doesn't win a Cup in 2 years he's looking for a new job.


Nah if he did the trade involving chucky it would result in that
4 nov. 2021 à 19 h 58
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 2,231
Mentions "j'aime": 401
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Im not talking about the trade above specifically. But Krebs vs Zary is highly debatable, and Monahan has a 10 team NTC only

I would have moved Coronato as well if push came to shove


Agreed. I can’t believe Treliving couldn’t find a way to get this done. A 3-way deal is a bit more complex, but it’s definitely not impossible to pull off to move Monahan somewhere else.

You had one job, Brad. He’s either too lazy to turn over every possible rock to get Eichel, or not competent to pull of the 3-way deal to get this done. Either way, it’s brutal for CGY fans. VGK has ponied up for Stone and Eichel while Brad just watches. A division rival has those two guys for the next 5+ years.

Would he have paid more if CGY was 4-5-0 to start the season? Yeah, probably. A 9-game sample size probably impacted his offer. And that is just bogus.
Gmonwy a aimé ceci.
4 nov. 2021 à 20 h 23
#10
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,538
Mentions "j'aime": 2,064
Quoting: Tkachinla
Agreed. I can’t believe Treliving couldn’t find a way to get this done. A 3-way deal is a bit more complex, but it’s definitely not impossible to pull off to move Monahan somewhere else.

You had one job, Brad. He’s either too lazy to turn over every possible rock to get Eichel, or not competent to pull of the 3-way deal to get this done. Either way, it’s brutal for CGY fans. VGK has ponied up for Stone and Eichel while Brad just watches. A division rival has those two guys for the next 5+ years.

Would he have paid more if CGY was 4-5-0 to start the season? Yeah, probably. A 9-game sample size probably impacted his offer. And that is just bogus.


Lots to unpack here.

Would you have been ok with 18 regular season games for Mark Stone? Because he wasn't signing an extension with Calgary. It would have cost Andersson or Valimaki. Flames would still have lost in 5 to the Avs.

Regarding Eichel, here's the big thing. Monahan's trade value is almost zero. If he could fetch anything worthwhile, he would not be in Calgary. He's been on the block for two seasons for a reason, there's not a lot of interest in him. It sounds like Buffalo wanted Tkachuk and not Monahan.

Look, I'm frustrated too, I wanted Eichel. Vegas had a much easier time making this deal due to their LTIR situation. Easy to say the Flames deal Monahan and Zadorov to make it work, but it takes two to make a deal. I doubt Buffalo would want either. Vegas is taking a significant amount of risk, they *should* make the playoffs, but they are so banged up that it's not a slam dunk.
4 nov. 2021 à 20 h 27
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,295
Quoting: ItWasIn
Lots to unpack here.

Would you have been ok with 18 regular season games for Mark Stone? Because he wasn't signing an extension with Calgary. It would have cost Andersson or Valimaki. Flames would still have lost in 5 to the Avs.

Regarding Eichel, here's the big thing. Monahan's trade value is almost zero. If he could fetch anything worthwhile, he would not be in Calgary. He's been on the block for two seasons for a reason, there's not a lot of interest in him. It sounds like Buffalo wanted Tkachuk and not Monahan.

Look, I'm frustrated too, I wanted Eichel. Vegas had a much easier time making this deal due to their LTIR situation. Easy to say the Flames deal Monahan and Zadorov to make it work, but it takes two to make a deal. I doubt Buffalo would want either. Vegas is taking a significant amount of risk, they *should* make the playoffs, but they are so banged up that it's not a slam dunk.


Adams confirmed today that Tkachuk was never in the trade talks, It was very likely Monahan.
4 nov. 2021 à 20 h 28
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,295
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
Treliving did that and Calgary doesn't win a Cup in 2 years he's looking for a new job.


Treliving contract ends after next season so he's probably looking for a new job regardless
4 nov. 2021 à 20 h 30
#13
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,538
Mentions "j'aime": 2,064
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Adams confirmed today that Tkachuk was never in the trade talks, It was very likely Monahan.


That's the big thing. Buffalo likely didn't really want Monahan. They'd take him, but the Flames better pay up.

Again, Monahan's value is very low right now. With the cap being what it is, I have a hard time seeing teams lining up to acquire him. So for fans that think they should have done a 3 way deal, that's crazy to me.
4 nov. 2021 à 21 h 7
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,295
Quoting: ItWasIn
That's the big thing. Buffalo likely didn't really want Monahan. They'd take him, but the Flames better pay up.

Again, Monahan's value is very low right now. With the cap being what it is, I have a hard time seeing teams lining up to acquire him. So for fans that think they should have done a 3 way deal, that's crazy to me.


Ok from what i heard, with Buffalo's start to the season they became more interested in acquiring a player that can help them now and not 2-3 years down the road. Tuch kinda fills that role and so does Monahan. I do agree that Monahan's value is pretty bad right now, however I do not think that is a good reason for a 3rd team no not try and buy low on him. SM is still a solid player and has shown to have been returning to himself in recent games. I like to use Boston as an example here since they really don't have reliable center depth. They do have a relatively young but proven NHL winger that has struggled as of recently in Jake DeBrusk. Lets say Buffalo agreed to retain 50% of Monahan's contract for DeBrusk and Boston's 1st this year. That would provide Boston with a reliable 2C that would likely have decent chemistry with Hall, and would take some workload off of Bergeron as well as allow Coyle to play a more defensive role. This is all purely hypothetical though.

For me at least a return of DeBrusk, 2 1sts, Zary, another good young prospect, and a 2nd is definitely a better return than they got today.
4 nov. 2021 à 21 h 50
#15
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,538
Mentions "j'aime": 2,064
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Ok from what i heard, with Buffalo's start to the season they became more interested in acquiring a player that can help them now and not 2-3 years down the road. Tuch kinda fills that role and so does Monahan. I do agree that Monahan's value is pretty bad right now, however I do not think that is a good reason for a 3rd team no not try and buy low on him. SM is still a solid player and has shown to have been returning to himself in recent games. I like to use Boston as an example here since they really don't have reliable center depth. They do have a relatively young but proven NHL winger that has struggled as of recently in Jake DeBrusk. Lets say Buffalo agreed to retain 50% of Monahan's contract for DeBrusk and Boston's 1st this year. That would provide Boston with a reliable 2C that would likely have decent chemistry with Hall, and would take some workload off of Bergeron as well as allow Coyle to play a more defensive role. This is all purely hypothetical though.

For me at least a return of DeBrusk, 2 1sts, Zary, another good young prospect, and a 2nd is definitely a better return than they got today.



That does make sense.

With Tuch, I think he had a ton of appeal for Vegas. 4 full years of control on a great contract for a big RW. He's also an upstate NY guy, grew up a Sabre fan. For as bad as things have been in Buffalo, there is a TON of value in getting players that want to be there. In terms of a Flames comp, you would probably be talking about Lindholm, term and cap hit or Mangiapane, no term but maybe better than Tuch. Both are non-starters.
soooonk a aimé ceci.
5 nov. 2021 à 9 h 50
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 410
Mentions "j'aime": 138
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Adams confirmed today that Tkachuk was never in the trade talks, It was very likely Monahan.


I think the Flames wanted players with more term. Sure, they could trade Monahan, but they might not get the return they would want to build their team.

Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Ok from what i heard, with Buffalo's start to the season they became more interested in acquiring a player that can help them now and not 2-3 years down the road. Tuch kinda fills that role and so does Monahan. I do agree that Monahan's value is pretty bad right now, however I do not think that is a good reason for a 3rd team no not try and buy low on him. SM is still a solid player and has shown to have been returning to himself in recent games. I like to use Boston as an example here since they really don't have reliable center depth. They do have a relatively young but proven NHL winger that has struggled as of recently in Jake DeBrusk. Lets say Buffalo agreed to retain 50% of Monahan's contract for DeBrusk and Boston's 1st this year. That would provide Boston with a reliable 2C that would likely have decent chemistry with Hall, and would take some workload off of Bergeron as well as allow Coyle to play a more defensive role. This is all purely hypothetical though.

For me at least a return of DeBrusk, 2 1sts, Zary, another good young prospect, and a 2nd is definitely a better return than they got today.



That's definitely a trade that I originally thought would happen. The fact it didn't makes me think Buffalo was more interested in Mang or Lindholm, which were probably non-starters with how the team is playing, plus, wouldn't work cap wise.
5 nov. 2021 à 10 h 18
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,919
Mentions "j'aime": 19,295
Quoting: soooonk
I think the Flames wanted players with more term. Sure, they could trade Monahan, but they might not get the return they would want to build their team.




That's definitely a trade that I originally thought would happen. The fact it didn't makes me think Buffalo was more interested in Mang or Lindholm, which were probably non-starters with how the team is playing, plus, wouldn't work cap wise.


Friedge said on TJMS that he's pretty sure it was around Monahan and 3 of Calgary's top prospects as well as picks (3 top prospects doesnt mean Flames top 3 prospects, likely 3 of the top 10 and at least 1 of the top 3)
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage