Sharks decline; we probably won’t trade Hertl but if we do this isn’t enough and if we were trading him to our biggest rival it would have to be an overpayment

It would be a crime for SJ not to get Brisson in return, SJ needs both halves of the Bordeleau/Brisson magic pairing.

Sens Decline, We have Watson which does the same role that Carrier does, also not as long term.

Hertl makes much more sense than Eichel for you guys imo.

I think thats a pretty decent package to the Sharks for a rental.

Very easy no. It's Brisson and a 1st or no deal will be considered. This one is not even close.

I would include Brisson if there was some sort of guaranteed extension but for now this is I think fair value.

Makes sense I just threw him in to dump some cap space.

yea you could potentially swap Dugan for Brisson but I'm just un sure considering he most likely walks in FA

It isn't fair value because he is being traded within the division to a rival, our biggest rival. We are basically helping Vegas win here when we could send Hertl out east for a probable better package than this and at the very least similar value. Vegas would have to pay more to get Hertl and SJ would want Brisson and if not included then that would break the deal. It's very simple math here.

Sorry friend, as others have pointed out it's Brisson or bust if you want to deal for Hertl.

yeah if you swap him for Brisson then I'd do it