SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What Marner and Tavares Combined 22M Could Have Been Used On

Créé par: UpsideDownQue
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 30 oct. 2021
Publié: 30 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
You cant convince me that this isnt better than the actual Leafs
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $75 360 116 $0 $400 000 $6 139 884 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 oct. 2021 à 18 h 35
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,928
Mentions "j'aime": 2,065
In other words, a contender
30 oct. 2021 à 18 h 36
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
This makes them worse
30 oct. 2021 à 18 h 36
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: sedin33
In other words, a contender


Not at all
30 oct. 2021 à 18 h 37
#4
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,595
Mentions "j'aime": 6,727
Not a fan of the goalie tandem. Swap Mrazek for Andersen wink
30 oct. 2021 à 18 h 39
#5
In Pridham we trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 3,589
Mentions "j'aime": 1,969
What does skipping the Tavares signing 3+ years ago have to do with signings last summer and this summer??

Also, Larsson was selected by Seattle and signed before UFA started.

Finally, those Saad and Danualt deals will be anchors in a few years.
30 oct. 2021 à 18 h 40
#6
TuckerKaberleSundin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 1,254
Mentions "j'aime": 636
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
This makes them worse


No lmao. It's a far better and more balanced roster.
30 oct. 2021 à 18 h 45
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
if only dubas had let half the team walk in UFA in 2018, and had his 21 year old premier playmaking winger disappear so he could wait 3 years to sign tatar, saad, danault, toffoli, and tanev in the span of 9 months
Barilko14 et Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
30 oct. 2021 à 18 h 47
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 2,571
Mentions "j'aime": 1,120
Downgrading Marner and Tavares to sign a guy who was scratched in the playoffs, a middle 6 winger and #4 dman?
30 oct. 2021 à 18 h 48
#9
TuckerKaberleSundin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 1,254
Mentions "j'aime": 636
Quoting: Barilko14
What does skipping the Tavares signing 3+ years ago have to do with signings last summer and this summer??

Also, Larsson was selected by Seattle and signed before UFA started.

Finally, those Saad and Danualt deals will be anchors in a few years.


Marner and Tavares are already anchors. Their contracts are holding a knife to the team's throat.

But if by "anchor" you mean their value decrease by 50%, Tavares will be one soon enough. The guy's getting slower and slower. I take a 5.5M Danault over an 11M Tavares anytime.
30 oct. 2021 à 18 h 48
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,742
Mentions "j'aime": 14,500
Makes them worse
Barilko14 a aimé ceci.
30 oct. 2021 à 18 h 48
#11
TuckerKaberleSundin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 1,254
Mentions "j'aime": 636
Quoting: TheresAlwaysNextYear
Downgrading Marner and Tavares to sign a guy who was scratched in the playoffs, a middle 6 winger and #4 dman?


Even scratched, Tatar did more than Marner ever did in the playoffs. The Habs shouldn't have scratched him.
30 oct. 2021 à 18 h 53
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: SheaWeber6
No lmao. It's a far better and more balanced roster.


This is just the usual Capfriendly Leafs suck mob think.
Barilko14 et Stavros99 a aimé ceci.
30 oct. 2021 à 18 h 55
#13
TuckerKaberleSundin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 1,254
Mentions "j'aime": 636
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
This is just the usual Capfriendly Leafs suck mob think.


It's not. What have top-heavy teams accomplished in the salary cap era? Not much. All it took was our 1C being matched against Danault in the playoffs to witness our whole salary cap structure crumble. It simply doesn't work.
30 oct. 2021 à 19 h 15
#14
Bedard23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 9,294
Mentions "j'aime": 4,476
Should be considering firing Kyle Dubas
oilersguy a aimé ceci.
30 oct. 2021 à 19 h 24
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,440
Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
Quoting: Barilko14
What does skipping the Tavares signing 3+ years ago have to do with signings last summer and this summer??

Also, Larsson was selected by Seattle and signed before UFA started.

Finally, those Saad and Danualt deals will be anchors in a few years.


Nothing really. Obviously it wouldn't be a direct substitute of all of these players for Marner and Tavares but I'm just trying to get at the general notion that a higher number of good players on cheap/fair deals is better than a small number of players on very expensive deals

Good point. I swapped him for Tanev

And Tavares' deal won't be? He will be 34 when his deal expires just like Danault, but at twice the cap hit. Saad will be 33 when his deal expires. I think Danault and Saad's deals will age better than Tavares' deal
30 oct. 2021 à 19 h 34
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,742
Mentions "j'aime": 14,500
Quoting: SheaWeber6
It's not. What have top-heavy teams accomplished in the salary cap era? Not much. All it took was our 1C being matched against Danault in the playoffs to witness our whole salary cap structure crumble. It simply doesn't work.


I mean, ask Tampa or Pittsburgh

#micdrop
Barilko14 a aimé ceci.
30 oct. 2021 à 19 h 41
#17
TuckerKaberleSundin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 1,254
Mentions "j'aime": 636
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
I mean, ask Tampa or Pittsburgh

#micdrop


They compensated with quality depth, which the Leafs haven't been able to sniff in years.
30 oct. 2021 à 19 h 51
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,440
Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
I mean, ask Tampa or Pittsburgh

#micdrop


TBLs highest cap hit for 2020 and 2021 was 9.5M with an 81.5M cap. Thats 11.66% of the cap

PITs highest cap hit for 2016 and 2017 was 9.5M with cap ceilings of 71.4M and 73M at the time. Thats 13.31% and 13.01% of the cap

Compare that to the Leafs who have Matthews making 14.28% of the cap, Tavares making 13.50% of the cap, and Marner making 13.38% of the cap. Thats 3 players who make a higher % of the cap than any single player on PIT or TBL did in the years they won the cup

Thats not exactly a direct comparable to the Leafs situation
DarcyTucker a aimé ceci.
30 oct. 2021 à 20 h 4
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,742
Mentions "j'aime": 14,500
Quoting: UpsideDownQue
TBLs highest cap hit for 2020 and 2021 was 9.5M with an 81.5M cap. Thats 11.66% of the cap

PITs highest cap hit for 2016 and 2017 was 9.5M with cap ceilings of 71.4M and 73M at the time. Thats 13.31% and 13.01% of the cap

Compare that to the Leafs who have Matthews making 14.28% of the cap, Tavares making 13.50% of the cap, and Marner making 13.38% of the cap. Thats 3 players who make a higher % of the cap than any single player on PIT or TBL did in the years they won the cup

Thats not exactly a direct comparable to the Leafs situation


Contracts weren't all signed at the same time and I'm talking about the years the contracts were signed

Pitt and Tampa clearly had high end contracts.

I hate the Leafs too, but atleast be right
Barilko14 et Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
30 oct. 2021 à 20 h 34
#20
In Pridham we trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 3,589
Mentions "j'aime": 1,969
Modifié 30 oct. 2021 à 20 h 53
Quoting: UpsideDownQue
Nothing really. Obviously it wouldn't be a direct substitute of all of these players for Marner and Tavares but I'm just trying to get at the general notion that a higher number of good players on cheap/fair deals is better than a small number of players on very expensive deals

Good point. I swapped him for Tanev

And Tavares' deal won't be? He will be 34 when his deal expires just like Danault, but at twice the cap hit. Saad will be 33 when his deal expires. I think Danault and Saad's deals will age better than Tavares' deal


Marner is 24 yo. When should they have gotten rid of him??

Trade him at 22 yo coming off a 90 pt season. How many times is that player traded? Please show me that list. At that point he's on pace to be Patrick Kane or better, but yeah, better trade him to improve their depth. No chance that looks incredibly stupid.

In your opinion when the Leafs were talking about needing to fill that 3C hole and that 2nd pair RD a couple of years ago, they start with their 22 yo 90 pt winger that finished top 15 in selke voting. That's really what people are suggesting? Should everyone start the trade Ratanen threads now before the big MacKinnon extension. Jost isn't looking great at 3C, that probably the best way for Colorado to plug that hole.

Mitch Marner is literally the 2nd best player the Leafs have had in the last 30 years, but gee I sure wish they had Saad and Tanev instead!

Also. Tavares is elite. When you get a shot at an elite player and it costs nothing but $$, you take it.

If the cap is $88m this season, people aren't whining about this. If Galchenyuk or Dermott don't cough up the puck in OT in game 5/6. Games the Leafs outplayed Mtl, people aren't whining about this.

Also quantity does not equal quality.

Except when it comes to the Leafs when of course, Depth >>>>>> stars
30 oct. 2021 à 20 h 55
#21
In Pridham we trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 3,589
Mentions "j'aime": 1,969
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Contracts weren't all signed at the same time and I'm talking about the years the contracts were signed

Pitt and Tampa clearly had high end contracts.

I hate the Leafs too, but atleast be right


Just gotta say, you rank really high on my list of sensible Leaf haters.
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
30 oct. 2021 à 21 h 11
#22
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,440
Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Contracts weren't all signed at the same time and I'm talking about the years the contracts were signed

Pitt and Tampa clearly had high end contracts.

I hate the Leafs too, but atleast be right


Who cares when they were signed. As of right now the leafs have too many players making too much money

I get that the cap has been stagnant for a couple years and nobody could have predicted that, but it is what it is. The PIT and TBL situations were completely different
30 oct. 2021 à 21 h 16
#23
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,440
Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
Quoting: Barilko14
Marner is 24 yo. When should they have gotten rid of him??

Trade him at 22 yo coming off a 90 pt season. How many times is that player traded? Please show me that list. At that point he's on pace to be Patrick Kane or better, but yeah, better trade him to improve their depth. No chance that looks incredibly stupid.

In your opinion when the Leafs were talking about needing to fill that 3C hole and that 2nd pair RD a couple of years ago, they start with their 22 yo 90 pt winger that finished top 15 in selke voting. That's really what people are suggesting? Should everyone start the trade Ratanen threads now before the big MacKinnon extension. Jost isn't looking great at 3C, that probably the best way for Colorado to plug that hole.

Mitch Marner is literally the 2nd best player the Leafs have had in the last 30 years, but gee I sure wish they had Saad and Tanev instead!

Also. Tavares is elite. When you get a shot at an elite player and it costs nothing but $$, you take it.

If the cap is $88m this season, people aren't whining about this. If Galchenyuk or Dermott don't cough up the puck in OT in game 5/6. Games the Leafs outplayed Mtl, people aren't whining about this.

Also quantity does not equal quality.

Except when it comes to the Leafs when of course, Depth >>>>>> stars


What are you talking about? I never said they should have traded Marner. All I said was that "a higher number of good players on cheap/fair deals is better than a small number of players on very expensive deals" and that the imaginary team I created above is better than the current Leafs team
30 oct. 2021 à 21 h 21
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,742
Mentions "j'aime": 14,500
Quoting: UpsideDownQue
Who cares when they were signed. As of right now the leafs have too many players making too much money

I get that the cap has been stagnant for a couple years and nobody could have predicted that, but it is what it is. The PIT and TBL situations were completely different


You are simply wrong
30 oct. 2021 à 21 h 26
#25
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,440
Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
You are simply wrong


Its mathematically correct though... The Leafs have 3 players who make a higher % of the current salary cap than any single player on TBL or PIT did in the years they won the cup. Thats a fact. You can say that the Leafs expected the cap to rise over time, and that would have been a very reasonable expectation at the time before COVID, but at the end of the day the current situation the Leafs are in is not the same as the situation TBL was in between 19-20 and 20-21 and is not the same situation that PIT was in between 15-16 and 16-17. Im not saying its the Leafs fault for not predicting the stagnant cap, but thats just the position they are in right now
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage