SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next Year

Créé par: Jeuck75
Équipe: 2022-23 Predators de Nashville
Date de création initiale: 27 oct. 2021
Publié: 27 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
2800 000 $
2925 000 $
2925 000 $
2925 000 $
2925 000 $
32 500 000 $
21 450 000 $
2925 000 $
Transactions
1.
NSH
  1. Amirov, Rodion
  2. Engvall, Pierre [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
TOR
    Forsberg at TDL (50%)

    pay ARI a 3rd to retain another 50% on the 3M
    2.
    NSH
      For retaining 1.5M on Forsberg
      ARI
      1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
      3.
      NSH
      1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (ANA)
      4.
      NSH
      1. Vesalainen, Kristian [Droits de RFA]
      2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (WPG)
      3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
      WPG
      1. Ekholm, Mattias (3 125 000 $ retained)
      5.
      NSH
      1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (VGK)
      6.
      NSH
      1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (OTT)
      2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TBL)
      Rachats de contrats
      Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2022
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de TOR
      Logo de WPG
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de TBL
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de LAK
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de VGK
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de NSH
      2023
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de NSH
      2024
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de WPG
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de NSH
      Logo de NSH
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2381 500 000 $52 922 333 $0 $345 000 $28 577 667 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
      AG, AD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
      AG, AD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      800 000 $800 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
      AD, C
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
      AD, C
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
      925 000 $925 000 $
      AG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      925 000 $925 000 $
      C, AD
      RFA - 1
      925 000 $925 000 $
      AG, AD
      RFA
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      894 167 $894 167 $
      AG
      RFA - 4
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      789 167 $789 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
      C, AG
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      750 000 $750 000 $
      AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      925 000 $925 000 $
      AG, C
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      925 000 $925 000 $
      C
      RFA
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      9 059 000 $9 059 000 $
      DG
      NMC
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      G
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      925 000 $925 000 $
      G
      RFA - 3
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      925 000 $925 000 $
      DG
      UFA
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      733 333 $733 333 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      733 333 $733 333 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Predators de Nashville
      800 000 $800 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      27 oct. 2021 à 20 h 43
      #1
      sensonfire
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2021
      Messages: 11,767
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,438
      Ottawa accepts.
      Jeuck75 a aimé ceci.
      27 oct. 2021 à 20 h 43
      #2
      Banni
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2016
      Messages: 33,053
      Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
      Detroit doesn't want Engvall from the Leafs, So we sure as hell don't want him from the Preds.
      Jeuck75, DeadWingsv2 et will9739 a aimé ceci.
      27 oct. 2021 à 20 h 44
      #3
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2020
      Messages: 15,684
      Mentions "j'aime": 6,958
      The Jets have no need for Ekholm anymore and his new contract is too much for too long.
      Jeuck75 a aimé ceci.
      27 oct. 2021 à 20 h 45
      #4
      Pens are the best
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2021
      Messages: 5,390
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,691
      Im guessing all these trades are at the TDL because you traded for 2022 picks?
      Jeuck75 a aimé ceci.
      27 oct. 2021 à 20 h 46
      #5
      Démarrer sujet
      Jeuck75
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2019
      Messages: 4,079
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,602
      Quoting: Imagine875948
      Im guessing all these trades are at the TDL because you traded for 2022 picks?


      Yup, lol
      27 oct. 2021 à 20 h 50
      #6
      Pens are the best
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2021
      Messages: 5,390
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,691
      Quoting: Jeuck75
      Yup, lol


      ok, lol
      Jeuck75 a aimé ceci.
      27 oct. 2021 à 21 h 14
      #7
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2017
      Messages: 7,594
      Mentions "j'aime": 5,187
      Quoting: Windjammer
      The Jets have no need for Ekholm anymore and his new contract is too much for too long.


      If Ekholm for less than he makes on his current contract is too much, I don't know what to tell you.
      Jeuck75 a aimé ceci.
      27 oct. 2021 à 22 h 35
      #8
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2020
      Messages: 15,684
      Mentions "j'aime": 6,958
      Quoting: gmgb
      If Ekholm for less than he makes on his current contract is too much, I don't know what to tell you.


      Other than not being needed I guess.
      28 oct. 2021 à 0 h 3
      #9
      Vegan Commie Hipster
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2020
      Messages: 7,888
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
      Quoting: Windjammer
      The Jets have no need for Ekholm anymore and his new contract is too much for too long.


      How are 'likely to age decline soon' Brenden Dillon and Logan 'couldn't generate offense if his life depended on it' Stanley a quality 2/3LD duo?

      For a team looking to contend currently

      With the opportunity cost of Hellebuyck

      It seems perfect to bring in Ekholm for them

      So LS can be a (barely) overqualified 7D

      Why is a roster always seen as just filling quotas

      You want as good a roster as possible always

      If cap becomes tight just unload dillon etc.
      Jeuck75 a aimé ceci.
      28 oct. 2021 à 11 h 18
      #10
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2020
      Messages: 15,684
      Mentions "j'aime": 6,958
      Quoting: Radu47
      How are 'likely to age decline soon' Brenden Dillon and Logan 'couldn't generate offense if his life depended on it' Stanley a quality 2/3LD duo?

      For a team looking to contend currently

      With the opportunity cost of Hellebuyck

      It seems perfect to bring in Ekholm for them

      So LS can be a (barely) overqualified 7D

      Why is a roster always seen as just filling quotas

      You want as good a roster as possible always

      If cap becomes tight just unload dillon etc.


      Or you could look at it as. Why should Winnipeg give up a former first round pick that is looking pretty good this year plus another first to marginally improve their defense with "likely to age decline soon" 31 year old Ekholm? When the Jets have just revamped their defense over the summer and have had less than 10 games to let the guys get used to each other.

      Why is a roster always seen as, you have to make every move possible and pay any unreasonable cost required, no matter how slight the perceived improvement might be.

      That's fan thinking (the grass is always greener). The idea is to build a team that wins on the ice. Not just collect talent and make a team that looks great on paper.

      Nashville had their chance to move Ekholm and kept their price unreasonable and weren't able to move him. Winnipeg has no reason or obligation to correct that mistake for Nashville. Nashville can just rebuild around a 31 year old defenseman.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage