SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Pushing

Créé par: Masonh618
Équipe: 2021-22 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 27 oct. 2021
Publié: 27 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Condition: If the Rangers are still around 3rd place in the Metro throughout the season come February, this is my push blueprint.

Tomas Hertl signs 7 X 7.5 extension.
Transactions
1.
VGK
  1. Gauthier, Julien
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (NYR)
2.
SJS
  1. Hájek, Libor
  2. Kravtsov, Vitali
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (WPG)
3.
NYR
NJD
    Nothing.
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de STL
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    2023
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    2024
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $80 866 469 $0 $6 700 000 $633 531 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
    AG
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    AG
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    3 641 667 $3 641 667 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    5 666 667 $5 666 667 $
    G
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
    DG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    762 500 $762 500 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    900 000 $900 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    27 oct. 2021 à 13 h 59
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 804
    Mentions "j'aime": 253
    Devils decline
    Masonh618 a aimé ceci.
    27 oct. 2021 à 14 h 3
    #2
    B
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2016
    Messages: 7,913
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,432
    Quoting: Erkadurk347
    Devils decline


    It's better than nothing!
    Masonh618 a aimé ceci.
    27 oct. 2021 à 14 h 5
    #3
    B
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2016
    Messages: 7,913
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,432
    Dreamy and everything, but now try 23, 24 & 25, season. Impossible while giving up futures...
    27 oct. 2021 à 14 h 7
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    MGITBPITNHL
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 3,507
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
    Quoting: Fox_Czar_Cup
    Dreamy and everything, but now try 23, 24 & 25, season. Impossible while giving up futures...


    I wouldn't say I gave up futures that are overly significant to 23 and forward, other than the 2022 1st -- but that should be irrelevant when it's being used to get a long term piece back in Hertl (as opposed to a short term piece like Smith).
    27 oct. 2021 à 14 h 8
    #5
    IamAlwaysRight
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 2,681
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
    Chytil or no deal. Kravtsov is overrated.
    27 oct. 2021 à 14 h 8
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    MGITBPITNHL
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 3,507
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    Chytil or no deal. Kravtsov is overrated.


    You're not GM.
    27 oct. 2021 à 14 h 12
    #7
    IamAlwaysRight
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 2,681
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
    Quoting: mhroblak
    You're not GM.


    You are not either. You are Armchair GM. The difference is not subtle.
    27 oct. 2021 à 14 h 16
    #8
    Jimbo1119
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 1,810
    Mentions "j'aime": 760
    Hajek and Krav don't add enough value to this deal. Maybe if Hajek- in some spot starts (due to injury or other players struggling) shows some dependability he can accrue some value...and maybe if Krav takes a bite of some humble pie...and returns to Hartford- where he shows he belongs in NY...then upon return shows some real NHL potential. I wouldn't hold my breath on either scenario...reality is Hajek is probably a fringe NHLer and Krav has a piss poor attitude that any NHL GM would be crazy to realize this type value in a deal for a horse like Hertl.
    27 oct. 2021 à 14 h 20
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    MGITBPITNHL
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 3,507
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    You are not either. You are Armchair GM. The difference is not subtle.


    My point is you have to judge trades by actual asset values. You can have the opinion that Vitali Kravtsov is "overrated," but you can't use that as a basis for trade value evaluation. That's only a player value evaluation.
    27 oct. 2021 à 14 h 22
    #10
    B
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2016
    Messages: 7,913
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,432
    Quoting: mhroblak
    I wouldn't say I gave up futures that are overly significant to 23 and forward, other than the 2022 1st -- but that should be irrelevant when it's being used to get a long term piece back in Hertl (as opposed to a short term piece like Smith).


    Well you gave away Hajek, Gauthier, 22 4th, 23 3rd, Kravtsov and a 22 1st that could come in handy as of 24-26 for 2 rentals!?!
    Cannot afford Hertl as of 24, period!
    HOCKEYBOY448 a aimé ceci.
    27 oct. 2021 à 14 h 22
    #11
    Démarrer sujet
    MGITBPITNHL
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 3,507
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
    Quoting: Jimbo1119
    Hajek and Krav don't add enough value to this deal. Maybe if Hajek- in some spot starts (due to injury or other players struggling) shows some dependability he can accrue some value...and maybe if Krav takes a bite of some humble pie...and returns to Hartford- where he shows he belongs in NY...then upon return shows some real NHL potential. I wouldn't hold my breath on either scenario...reality is Hajek is probably a fringe NHLer and Krav has a piss poor attitude that any NHL GM would be crazy to realize this type value in a deal for a horse like Hertl.


    It's well known that Kravtsov's trade value has plummeted ever since the beginning of his hiatus, but I would evaluate his value as about a 2nd (Lias Andersson). For a guy on an expiring deal like Tomas Hertl, my expectation is his package to be something a little better than the package for Christian Dvorak (that's Hajek + 4th in this case).
    27 oct. 2021 à 14 h 25
    #12
    Démarrer sujet
    MGITBPITNHL
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 3,507
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
    Quoting: Fox_Czar_Cup
    Well you gave away Hajek, Gauthier, 22 4th, 23 3rd, Kravtsov and a 22 1st that could come in handy as of 24-26 for 2 rentals!?!
    Cannot afford Hertl as of 24, period!


    Do you really believe Hajek and Gauthier are definitive futures? They're both depth pieces who are very replaceable. League minimum players would give the Rangers the same production as them.
    And I'm not giving up Kravtsov and the 22 1st (the only two significant future pieces) for a rental. If you read the description, I have Hertl signing an extension with the Rangers. How did you come to the conclusion that New York can't afford him in 2024?
    27 oct. 2021 à 14 h 39
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 1,161
    Mentions "j'aime": 437
    Sharks will make the playoffs I think.
    27 oct. 2021 à 14 h 48
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 6,563
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
    Quoting: mhroblak
    Do you really believe Hajek and Gauthier are definitive futures? They're both depth pieces who are very replaceable. League minimum players would give the Rangers the same production as them.
    And I'm not giving up Kravtsov and the 22 1st (the only two significant future pieces) for a rental. If you read the description, I have Hertl signing an extension with the Rangers. How did you come to the conclusion that New York can't afford him in 2024?


    Please show in this scenario them resigning Laf, Miller, Kakko and Fox under this Hertl acquisition. Genuinely curious to see how you fill out the roster in 2023-24.
    Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
    27 oct. 2021 à 14 h 56
    #15
    IamAlwaysRight
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 2,681
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
    Quoting: mhroblak
    My point is you have to judge trades by actual asset values. You can have the opinion that Vitali Kravtsov is "overrated," but you can't use that as a basis for trade value evaluation. That's only a player value evaluation.


    Your trade does not equate to even remotely fair value. Sooo your response is quite moot
    27 oct. 2021 à 14 h 58
    #16
    B
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2016
    Messages: 7,913
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,432
    Quoting: mhroblak
    If you read the description, I have Hertl signing an extension with the Rangers. How did you come to the conclusion that New York can't afford him in 2024?


    Stop + Make yourself 23, 24, 25 seasons = Answer, no cap
    27 oct. 2021 à 15 h 2
    #17
    Jimbo1119
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 1,810
    Mentions "j'aime": 760
    Quoting: mhroblak
    It's well known that Kravtsov's trade value has plummeted ever since the beginning of his hiatus, but I would evaluate his value as about a 2nd (Lias Andersson). For a guy on an expiring deal like Tomas Hertl, my expectation is his package to be something a little better than the package for Christian Dvorak (that's Hajek + 4th in this case).


    The only way the Rangers could consider this deal would be to be enabled contact with Hertl- to either make a deal or at least confirm that they are going to be able to extend him...a rental is senseless- yet it seems you are depending on this "unknown" to reduce the value back SJS can demand. So with a deal in place (or soon to be in place)- even though the contract would be much more than Dvorak's...Hertl is a MUCH better player than Dvorak...so the difference would still require considerably more than the addition of Hajek and a 4th.
    27 oct. 2021 à 15 h 3
    #18
    B
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2016
    Messages: 7,913
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,432
    Quoting: mhroblak
    Do you really believe Hajek and Gauthier are definitive futures? They're both depth pieces who are very replaceable. League minimum players would give the Rangers the same production as them.
    And I'm not giving up Kravtsov and the 22 1st (the only two significant future pieces) for a rental.


    Hajek, Gauthier, 4th & 3rd for a 2nd, Kravtsov for an early 2nd, keep the 22 1st... would be more beneficial than 2 rentals.
    27 oct. 2021 à 16 h 6
    #19
    Démarrer sujet
    MGITBPITNHL
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 3,507
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    Your trade does not equate to even remotely fair value. Sooo your response is quite moot


    Explain. Hertl on an expiring deal will receive a slightly better return than Christian Dvorak.
    27 oct. 2021 à 16 h 6
    #20
    Démarrer sujet
    MGITBPITNHL
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 3,507
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
    Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
    Please show in this scenario them resigning Laf, Miller, Kakko and Fox under this Hertl acquisition. Genuinely curious to see how you fill out the roster in 2023-24.


    Quoting: Fox_Czar_Cup
    Stop + Make yourself 23, 24, 25 seasons = Answer, no cap


    I’ll do it later tonight and tag both of you.
    Fox_Czar_Cup et HOCKEYBOY448 a aimé ceci.
    27 oct. 2021 à 16 h 7
    #21
    IamAlwaysRight
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 2,681
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
    Quoting: mhroblak
    Explain. Hertl on an expiring deal will receive a slightly better return than Christian Dvorak.


    Im not going to explain what you can easily research on your own.
    27 oct. 2021 à 16 h 11
    #22
    Démarrer sujet
    MGITBPITNHL
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 3,507
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
    Quoting: Jimbo1119
    The only way the Rangers could consider this deal would be to be enabled contact with Hertl- to either make a deal or at least confirm that they are going to be able to extend him...a rental is senseless- yet it seems you are depending on this "unknown" to reduce the value back SJS can demand. So with a deal in place (or soon to be in place)- even though the contract would be much more than Dvorak's...Hertl is a MUCH better player than Dvorak...so the difference would still require considerably more than the addition of Hajek and a 4th.


    You’re too one dimensional evaluating the trade value of Hertl and Dvorak by only basing them off player value. Dvorak had one of the best contracts in the NHL and is under contract long-term. Hertl meanwhile is on an expiring deal for the Sharks and is most likely not coming back unless San Jose remains a playoff contender.

    Please give me a player on an expiring contract who netted a better return than the one I proposed. Not even Mark Stone netted 75% of my package.
    27 oct. 2021 à 16 h 12
    #23
    Démarrer sujet
    MGITBPITNHL
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 3,507
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    Im not going to explain what you can easily research on your own.


    Well thanks for stopping by then, troll.
    27 oct. 2021 à 16 h 16
    #24
    Démarrer sujet
    MGITBPITNHL
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 3,507
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
    Modifié 27 oct. 2021 à 16 h 29
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    Im not going to explain what you can easily research on your own.


    So far my research has led me to a package less than the one I offered: the Matt Duchene deal (which happened back before anyone knew Ottawa’s 1st would be 4th OVR).
    The Hockey Writers
    27 oct. 2021 à 16 h 21
    #25
    Speak of the Devil
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 23,935
    Mentions "j'aime": 26,436
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    Your trade does not equate to even remotely fair value. Sooo your response is quite moot


    I mean it's pretty close to value
    Chytil + 1st or Kravstov + 1st for Hertl is fair
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage