SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lindholm

Créé par: Campabee
Équipe: 2021-22 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 25 oct. 2021
Publié: 25 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
ANA
  1. Chiarot, Ben
  2. Lehkonen, Artturi
  3. Norlinder, Mattias
  4. Tuch, Luke [Liste de réserve]
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (MTL)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CAR
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de CAR
Logo de ANA
Logo de MTL
Logo de TBL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
2023
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $69 189 880 $597 561 $1 475 000 $12 310 120 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance637 500 $$638K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 343 750 $2 343 750 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
725 000 $725 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 oct. 2021 à 12 h 51
#1
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,688
Mentions "j'aime": 24,611
I can't see us trading Lindholm and Steel and not getting a 2022 first.
25 oct. 2021 à 12 h 53
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,213
Mentions "j'aime": 6,242
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I can't see us trading Lindholm and Steel and not getting a 2022 first.


Montreal can't trade the 22 1st until the draft order is set, hence the reason for the 23 1st lol
25 oct. 2021 à 12 h 57
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 4,422
Mentions "j'aime": 1,457
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I can't see us trading Lindholm and Steel and not getting a 2022 first.


Wanting Shane Wright, Matthew Savoie, Brad Lambert or someone else who is elite is a lot to ask for a rental d man and a unproven centre prospect
25 oct. 2021 à 13 h 1
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,213
Mentions "j'aime": 6,242
Quoting: KeepUps15
Wanting Shane Wright, Matthew Savoie, Brad Lambert or someone else who is elite is a lot to ask for a rental d man and a unproven centre prospect


Steel is hardly unproven center prospect, you could argue a 3C but he has played 4 years in the NHL. That said, you are right that is a lot for a 3C and rental D
25 oct. 2021 à 13 h 2
#5
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,688
Mentions "j'aime": 24,611
Quoting: KeepUps15
Wanting Shane Wright, Matthew Savoie, Brad Lambert or someone else who is elite is a lot to ask for a rental d man and a unproven centre prospect


By definition, Montreal's remaining first can't be higher than #11.

Oh, wait a minute, if it's a top ten, Montreal gets to keep it, and it could turn into Shane Wright. Spoke too soon!
habslife a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2021 à 13 h 3
#6
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,688
Mentions "j'aime": 24,611
Quoting: Campabee
Montreal can't trade the 22 1st until the draft order is set, hence the reason for the 23 1st lol


You don't think that Anaheim could accept the conditions on the other first and take the leftover?

Oh, wait a minute, if it's a top ten, Montreal gets to keep it, and it could turn into Shane Wright. Spoke too soon!
25 oct. 2021 à 13 h 5
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,213
Mentions "j'aime": 6,242
Quoting: OldNYIfan
You don't think that Anaheim could accept the conditions on the other first and take the leftover?

Oh, wait a minute, if it's a top ten, Montreal gets to keep it, and it could turn into Shane Wright. Spoke too soon!


Yes that is why the draft order has to be set lol
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2021 à 13 h 6
#8
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,688
Mentions "j'aime": 24,611
Quoting: Campabee
Montreal can't trade the 22 1st until the draft order is set, hence the reason for the 23 1st lol


And my main point was that I think we'd go elsewhere, for that reason.
25 oct. 2021 à 13 h 11
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,213
Mentions "j'aime": 6,242
Quoting: OldNYIfan
And my main point was that I think we'd go elsewhere, for that reason.


No doubt but the package is pretty significant and likely you won't get a better one for Lindholm and Steel even in separate trades. Norlinder + Lehkonen + 1st (even a year later) for Lindholm is a solid package and Tuch and Chiarot for a 3C is a slight overpay. I could have probably gotten away with just adding Tuch 1 for 1 but we needed to move salary and Chiatot's deal is expiring so he makes sense on both sides. I don't know many teams that are going to be near the middle of the draft that will offer a 22 1st + top D prospect + a middle 6 forward.
25 oct. 2021 à 14 h 20
#10
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,688
Mentions "j'aime": 24,611
Quoting: Campabee
No doubt but the package is pretty significant and likely you won't get a better one for Lindholm and Steel even in separate trades. Norlinder + Lehkonen + 1st (even a year later) for Lindholm is a solid package and Tuch and Chiarot for a 3C is a slight overpay. I could have probably gotten away with just adding Tuch 1 for 1 but we needed to move salary and Chiatot's deal is expiring so he makes sense on both sides. I don't know many teams that are going to be near the middle of the draft that will offer a 22 1st + top D prospect + a middle 6 forward.


In isolation it's certainly a reasonable package for those two players, but with specific application to Anaheim, I can't view it with anything more than lukewarm sentiment. Norlinder and the first for Lindholm without any retention is fair, but Lehkonen and Tuch are surplus to our needs, and Chiarot would be only a temporary stopgap at LD.
TZ11 a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2021 à 17 h 4
#11
Boris Bagel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 2,791
Mentions "j'aime": 587
Habs say no
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage