SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

This doesnt have to be complicated

Créé par: BCAPP
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 24 oct. 2021
Publié: 24 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Move Bunting to the top line. He's playing well.

Move kerfoot to Tavares left wing, he plays well with Nylander.

Move engvall to the checking line.

Move Ritchie to the fourth line and it will be an intimidating bruising line, with some scoring punch.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $81 363 116 $0 $400 000 $136 884 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 oct. 2021 à 15 h 13
#1
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
For the love of god please also break up Muzzin and Holl
Janasazi a aimé ceci.
24 oct. 2021 à 15 h 13
#2
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 15,844
Mentions "j'aime": 8,548
ritchie and simmonds on the same line sounds scary
BCAPP et csick a aimé ceci.
24 oct. 2021 à 15 h 20
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,213
Mentions "j'aime": 744
finally someone else said. Muzzin and Holl can be broken up too
24 oct. 2021 à 15 h 23
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 370
Mentions "j'aime": 202
I like the logic but a player being paid 2.5 million to be on a checking line is a little hard to swallow. Especially on a team tight against the cap.

He also becomes irrelevant when Mikheyev comes back

Hell yes, to breaking Muzzin and Holl
24 oct. 2021 à 15 h 26
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Zuki9797
ritchie and simmonds on the same line sounds scary


Why? Ritchie doesn’t play physically
24 oct. 2021 à 15 h 29
#6
Smythe.over.Hart
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,032
Mentions "j'aime": 2,348
What about Kerfoot Matthews Nylander. As stated Kerfoot plays well with Nylander. And this has the feel of the Hyman Matthews Nylander days. Then Bunting Tavares Marner. Bottom six as you have it.
24 oct. 2021 à 15 h 31
#7
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Ah yes.. the top line is struggling so let's mix up all 4 lines and things will magically be perfect!

It's been 6 games of 82. Chill out Leafs nation. The depth has been good and the stars will come around. Relax.
Bruinadian67 a aimé ceci.
24 oct. 2021 à 15 h 43
#8
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: faulkmydzingel
What about Kerfoot Matthews Nylander. As stated Kerfoot plays well with Nylander. And this has the feel of the Hyman Matthews Nylander days. Then Bunting Tavares Marner. Bottom six as you have it.


That’s the problem with Kerfoot, he is a square peg the Leafs keep trying to fit into a circle. He is not a top 6 FWD (tho paid like one on this roster), not a shutdown C, is not good offensively. I feel like people are blinded by a 7 game performance and not taken into account how poor he is offensively. He is ok defensively but no better than Kampf, Engvall, Kase, Mikheyev, all who make significantly less. Kerfoot’s versatility is no longer of value. They need an impactful top 6 FWD. He most certainly is not Hyman.
24 oct. 2021 à 15 h 44
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,379
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: Janasazi
I like the logic but a player being paid 2.5 million to be on a checking line is a little hard to swallow. Especially on a team tight against the cap.

He also becomes irrelevant when Mikheyev comes back

Hell yes, to breaking Muzzin and Holl


It's funny how the leafs cap is so tight people are so upset at that. Check out the islanders bottom 6 for pay.

But the reason Ritchie is on the fourth line is Kampf. With Kampf as our 3c it has to be a checking line as he cannot produce much offense. Ritchie on the other hand is a bad defensive player. So because he can NOT actually play on a checking line, it's line 1, 2, or 4. So he's going to down to line 4 which is more of a banging/energy line in the above
24 oct. 2021 à 15 h 45
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,379
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: faulkmydzingel
What about Kerfoot Matthews Nylander. As stated Kerfoot plays well with Nylander. And this has the feel of the Hyman Matthews Nylander days. Then Bunting Tavares Marner. Bottom six as you have it.


Yeah that could work too
24 oct. 2021 à 15 h 46
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,379
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: MatthewsFan
That’s the problem with Kerfoot, he is a square peg the Leafs keep trying to fit into a circle. He is not a top 6 FWD (tho paid like one on this roster), not a shutdown C, is not good offensively. I feel like people are blinded by a 7 game performance and not taken into account how poor he is offensively. He is ok defensively but no better than Kampf, Engvall, Kase, Mikheyev, all who make significantly less. Kerfoot’s versatility is no longer of value. They need an impactful top 6 FWD. He most certainly is not Hyman.


Why is he not a top 6 fwd? His even strength scoring is probably top 40 for a lw
24 oct. 2021 à 15 h 47
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,379
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: TrueCanuck
Ah yes.. the top line is struggling so let's mix up all 4 lines and things will magically be perfect!

It's been 6 games of 82. Chill out Leafs nation. The depth has been good and the stars will come around. Relax.


Actually I've been saying this since the preseason. I think kerfoot and engvall make sense as described. I had Ritchie and Bunting opposite before. But I think it makes sense now.
24 oct. 2021 à 15 h 59
#13
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: BCAPP
Why is he not a top 6 fwd? His even strength scoring is probably top 40 for a lw


Beating a dead horse, I’ve said my thoughts on him before. But for one last time: he does not drive offense in any regards and that has been what makes him seem miscast as a potential top six winger. He’s not physical and even if he does finish his checks they aren’t much of a deterrent. As for Kerfoot’s offensive production last season his G/60 was the lowest of his career, and his P/60 was his lowest as a Leaf and second lowest after the year that saw him traded from Colorado to Toronto.

Edit:
If he is there answer to the top 6 they are in trouble
24 oct. 2021 à 16 h 5
#14
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: BCAPP
Actually I've been saying this since the preseason. I think kerfoot and engvall make sense as described. I had Ritchie and Bunting opposite before. But I think it makes sense now.


The 4th line has been Toronto's most consistent line, why break that up? If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

Nylander and Tavares have had plenty of chemistry over the years and Bunting has fit in perfect beside them, nothing guarantees Bunting has that success beside Matthews and Marner. Again, something that's not broke so don't fix it.

The checking line has been doing its job and each player compliments each other well. Could be changed up a bit, but doesn't need to be looked at as a concern.

Ritchie is the same type of player that Hyman was - both aren't great skaters but they're there to dig the puck out of the corners. Yes Ritchie is frustratingly inconsistent, but he earned that role out of camp for now. 6 games into the season is a pretty small sample size when so far he's been exactly what you should have expected.

I'm not saying that Toronto should be opposed to a change, personally I think they should just swap Marner and Nylander and leave the rest as is. Nylander would be a better compliment on the top line cause he's more of a shooting threat than Marner is but he can still find Matthews with a pass if needed so it opens up more ice for both of Nylander and Matthews. While Marner had his best season alongside Tavares so reunite them and see if it gets him going.

But again, the lines shouldn't be messed with too much just to get 1 line going. You risk messing with chemistry too much by doing that and that could hurt you more long term than you realize.
24 oct. 2021 à 17 h 56
#15
No regretzkys
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 804
Mentions "j'aime": 389
I like these lines.

The top guys aren't producing right now though. No line combos can fix it.

Once Matthews starts rolling the Leafs will be back in business.
24 oct. 2021 à 21 h 58
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,379
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: MatthewsFan
Beating a dead horse, I’ve said my thoughts on him before. But for one last time: he does not drive offense in any regards and that has been what makes him seem miscast as a potential top six winger. He’s not physical and even if he does finish his checks they aren’t much of a deterrent. As for Kerfoot’s offensive production last season his G/60 was the lowest of his career, and his P/60 was his lowest as a Leaf and second lowest after the year that saw him traded from Colorado to Toronto.

Edit:
If he is there answer to the top 6 they are in trouble


He has 46 even strength points the last 3 seasons. It's essentially the same as guys like Backstrom, Forsberg, and others of that ilk. Most teams don't have 6 top end guys in their top 6. He is a totally adequate top 6 lw.
24 oct. 2021 à 22 h 5
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,379
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: TrueCanuck
The 4th line has been Toronto's most consistent line, why break that up? If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

Nylander and Tavares have had plenty of chemistry over the years and Bunting has fit in perfect beside them, nothing guarantees Bunting has that success beside Matthews and Marner. Again, something that's not broke so don't fix it.

The checking line has been doing its job and each player compliments each other well. Could be changed up a bit, but doesn't need to be looked at as a concern.

Ritchie is the same type of player that Hyman was - both aren't great skaters but they're there to dig the puck out of the corners. Yes Ritchie is frustratingly inconsistent, but he earned that role out of camp for now. 6 games into the season is a pretty small sample size when so far he's been exactly what you should have expected.

I'm not saying that Toronto should be opposed to a change, personally I think they should just swap Marner and Nylander and leave the rest as is. Nylander would be a better compliment on the top line cause he's more of a shooting threat than Marner is but he can still find Matthews with a pass if needed so it opens up more ice for both of Nylander and Matthews. While Marner had his best season alongside Tavares so reunite them and see if it gets him going.

But again, the lines shouldn't be messed with too much just to get 1 line going. You risk messing with chemistry too much by doing that and that could hurt you more long term than you realize.


The lines have all shifted anyway pre and post Matthews being off. Essentially every "line" on the leafs has been more of a pair.

Kampf/Kase for the checking line and spezza/Simmonds for the 4th line.

Engvall was on the checking line and amadio on the fourth before Matthews returned. So I'm essentially just saying put those lines back to engvall on the third and Ritchie in place of spezza.

The top lines did shift because of Matthews return anyway.

But honestly I never loved the Ritchie pick up nor his place there and the comparisons to Hyman are why people are mistaken. Hyman is a gritty guy who fights for the puck and digs it out. He's a very good two way forward and can play up and down the line up. For his career he averages 113 hits/82 gp. He's physical and gritty but not a crazy intimidating tough guy. If you need a term for him he'd be a skilled grinder.

Ritchie is more of a big hitting, intimidating guy who when he is scoring is a traditional power forward. He's actively bad defensively and isn't digging pucks out of corners so much as just clobbering guys into corners. He averages 204 hits per 82 gp season. He certainly has a role and on most teams he'd be a good third line winger. The issue is the leafs have decided the third line has to be a defensive one and he can't do that.

So based on who we have I think making a nasty 4th line and letting him be the big body on the pp is the best way to use him
24 oct. 2021 à 23 h 28
#18
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Modifié 25 oct. 2021 à 0 h 1
Quoting: BCAPP
He has 46 even strength points the last 3 seasons.w It's essentially the same as guys like Backstrom, Forsberg, and others of that ilk. Most teams don't have 6 top end guys in their top 6. He is a totally adequate top 6 lw.


Ugh, I hate that I even had to look this up, I don’t understand the love for Kerfoot:
Kerfoot 44 5v5 points last 2 years as a Leaf) (121 games)
Backstrom 48 5v5 points (last 2 years) (only 116 games) he adds to that total if given 5 extra games
Forsberg 45 5v5 points (last 2 years) (in only 102 games)

Mentioning Backstrom and Forsberg in this same breath as Kerfoot is ridiculous. They are nowhere near close, that is a terrible comparison (“essentially the same as guys like Backstrom, Forsberg, and others of that ilk”) they are not the same ilk.

If you want Kerfoot in your top 6, fine.

I look forward to the day he is traded for a top 6 winger.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage