SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Worth a try

Créé par: buffdaddy
Équipe: 2021-22 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 22 oct. 2021
Publié: 22 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Not sure what ANA lines would be after all of these trades...
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Scandella, Marco
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (STL)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (STL)
STL
  1. Lindholm, Hampus (2 602 778 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Lindolm extends 4x5.5
2.
BUF
  1. McTavish, Mason
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (STL)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
2023 2nd round pick becomes 2023 1st (top 5 protected) if Eichel reaches 60+ points in 2022-2023 season.
3.
ANA
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Near trade deadline deal:
2023 conditional pick if EDM reaches 2nd round of playoffs. (retaining salary?)
EDM
  1. Manson, Josh (2 050 000 $ retained)
4.
ANA
  1. Addison, Calen
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (MIN)
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (MIN)
Détails additionnels:
Near trade deadline:
Not sure if this is a fair trade or if the wild need forward depth for the playoffs. Just taking a guess...
MIN
  1. Rakell, Rickard (1 000 000 $ retained)
5.
NYR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (ANA)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
For fun.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de EDM
Logo de MIN
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de MIN
Logo de NSH
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de STL
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $61 971 444 $0 $4 265 000 $19 528 556 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 500 000 $$2M)
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 037 500 $2 037 500 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
822 500 $822 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
3 275 000 $3 275 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
809 166 $809 166 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 oct. 2021 à 18 h 26
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,211
Mentions "j'aime": 10,557
Not enough for Eichel
Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
22 oct. 2021 à 18 h 34
#2
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,682
Mentions "j'aime": 24,604
Scandella isn't the kind of player we'd be looking for in a Lindholm trade, but I understand he's almost required due to the Blues' cap situation. Without that, Perunovich and a first is more along the lines we'd be thinking.

That's not enough for Eichel, and I don't think that we have enough tradeable AND SURPLUS assets to acquire him.

The other trades are fine with me, although I 'm not a Kravtsov fan.
22 oct. 2021 à 18 h 44
#3
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 28,469
Mentions "j'aime": 11,075
Honestly, I have no idea how the Blues would react to that. For me personally, I'm not interested in shelling out so much and then trying to find extra cap space for his extension, if not also blocking Perunovich. That may just be me, as I know plenty of Blues fans have a big problem with Scandella.



Quoting: OldNYIfan
Scandella isn't the kind of player we'd be looking for in a Lindholm trade, but I understand he's almost required due to the Blues' cap situation. Without that, Perunovich and a first is more along the lines we'd be thinking.



Yeah, that's not happening.
22 oct. 2021 à 18 h 45
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 1,907
Mentions "j'aime": 449
No, Not a chance from Minnesota. Minnesota has Adam Beckman, and Matt boldy who are ready along with connor dewar and others. Winger isn't a need. Minnesota is the wrong team. Calen Addison isn't going anywhere As before 20 to 30 games, Calen addison will take over 6d for Minnesota. Sorry, No deal. Rik also isn't getting that worth
22 oct. 2021 à 19 h 10
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 4,389
Mentions "j'aime": 3,118
Yeah, we don't need Rakell unless he's coming over as a center. If it's as a winger, he isn't necessary. Both Boldy and Beckman are near ready for the NHL and both would be on ELCs.

Furthermore, Rakell isn't worth giving up a top 50 prospect for. Swap out Addison for someone else and we might consider it. Rossi, Boldy, Beckman, Addison, Wallstedt, Khusnutdinov, Lambos are all or most likely off the table. If you want a defenseman I would suggest looking at Daemon Hunt. He may be a lefty but he can and does play the right side.
22 oct. 2021 à 19 h 21
#6
MGITBPITNHL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,495
Mentions "j'aime": 1,530
New York accepts for fun
22 oct. 2021 à 19 h 46
#7
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,403
Mentions "j'aime": 2,894
Not enough for Lindholm. Not enough for Eichel. Too much for Manson. Too much for Rakell(I think Addison is very highly rated). And the Kravtsov trade isn’t bad I just wouldn’t give up pick 35-38 for him.
22 oct. 2021 à 20 h 7
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,125
Mentions "j'aime": 6,133
Sabres take this, frankly its a pretty good offer
22 oct. 2021 à 22 h 32
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,928
Mentions "j'aime": 2,670
I like McTavish, but need add, we also need to return 5-6 million back so that we get to the floor and the league allows trade.
22 oct. 2021 à 22 h 42
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 8,205
Mentions "j'aime": 3,641
I don't think Rakell holds that much value anymore. He's 4 years removed from his 30g seasons, last year was a bad year for him, and he is a rental. A 2nd+4th is all I think he'd fetch unless he turns it around.
23 oct. 2021 à 6 h 10
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 1,769
Mentions "j'aime": 491
Quoting: mokumboi
Honestly, I have no idea how the Blues would react to that. For me personally, I'm not interested in shelling out so much and then trying to find extra cap space for his extension, if not also blocking Perunovich. That may just be me, as I know plenty of Blues fans have a big problem with Scandella.


I’d be all over this. Lindholm is a legit top pairing defenseman and the only player blocking Perunovich would be Mikkola. A top 4 of Lindholm-Parayko-Krug-Faulk is elite. I also think adding Lindholm this year as a rental takes us to the top tier of contenders. All that being said, I reckon Anaheim would want more.
23 oct. 2021 à 7 h 14
#12
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 28,469
Mentions "j'aime": 11,075
Quoting: BluesBandit
I’d be all over this. Lindholm is a legit top pairing defenseman and the only player blocking Perunovich would be Mikkola. A top 4 of Lindholm-Parayko-Krug-Faulk is elite. I also think adding Lindholm this year as a rental takes us to the top tier of contenders. All that being said, I reckon Anaheim would want more.


I figured you would. Honestly, if we were getting 2018 Lindholm, I'd probably jump, too. But a bit of shine has come off Lindholm's apple the last couple seasons. Is that just the injuries? Is it him or playing with the Ducks? Probably a bit of all three. Maybe he goes back to normal with a good team like the Blues. I'm just not sure I want to gamble that much young talent capital (especially in a time when we're trying to beef the prospect pool back up) and the extra cap space needed to fit him in moving forward. I think there's options out there that are about as good for much less in trade cost/salary. My choice would be to grab Soucy.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage