Forums/Armchair-GM

Sharks TDL

Créé par: KMarner10
Date de création initiale: 27 sept. 2021
Publié: 22 oct. 2021
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Explications
Note - I do not watch the Sharks that often, but this is something that I think could help the team in the long run. Lots of cap space, great young players, and this team could either be good enough to push for the playoffs or fall into a lottery spot.

Hertl resigned around 8x8 , Dahlen, Studnicka, Barabanov all resigned for 2-5 years depending on what they deserve.

Couture was only traded because it benefitted both teams - Boston got their 2C, SJ got a 1st in a stacked draft class, a middle 6 forward in Coyle and a good young forward that can compliment Eklund and Dahlen.

Also - These were just hypothetical trades that I don't think are going to happen. Some of the values could be way off.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Dahlen, Jonathan1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. 2022 2e round pick (CAR)
  2. 2023 3e round pick (CAR)
CAR
  1. Kane, Evander (3 000 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
They can get another team to retain $2M
2.
SJS
  1. Coyle, Charlie (750 000 $ retained)
  2. Studnicka, Jack
  3. 2022 1e round pick (BOS)
Détails additionnels:
Retained by ARI
BOS
  1. Couture, Logan
  2. 2023 3e round pick (CAR)
Détails additionnels:
$2M retained by ARI
3.
SJS
    For retaining Coyle
    ARI
    1. 2023 4e round pick (SJS)
    2. 2022 5e round pick (BUF)
    Rachats de contrats
    • Martin Jones: 1 916 667 $
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    • Evander Kane: 3 000 000 $ (42.86%)
    ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
    2022
    SJS
    BOS
    CAR
    SJS
    SJS
    SJS
    ARI
    MIN
    2023
    SJS
    SJS
    SJS
    SJS
    SJS
    SJS
    2024
    SJS
    SJS
    SJS
    SJS
    SJS
    SJS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS BONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $72 225 001 $0 $1 202 500 $9 274 999 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    SJS
    Eklund, William
    925 000 $
    AG
    RFA - 3
    SJS
    Hertl, Tomas
    5 625 000 $
    C, AD
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    BOS
    Studnicka, Jack
    769 167 $
    AD, C
    RFA - 1
    SJS
    Meier, Timo
    6 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    BOS
    Coyle, Charlie
    4 500 000 $
    C, AD
    NMC NTC
    UFA - 5
    SJS
    Balcers, Rūdolfs
    1 550 000 $
    AD, AG
    RFA - 2
    Dahlen, Jonathan
    750 000 $
    SJS
    Bonino, Nick
    2 050 000 $
    C
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    SJS
    Labanc, Kevin
    4 725 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 3
    SJS
    Cogliano, Andrew
    1 000 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    SJS
    Weatherby, Jasper
    842 500 $
    C
    RFA - 2
    SJS
    Barabanov, Alexander
    1 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    SJS
    Ferraro, Mario
    925 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 1
    SJS
    Burns, Brent
    8 000 000 $
    DD
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    SJS
    Reimer, James
    2 250 000 $
    G
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    SJS
    Simek, Radim
    2 250 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    SJS
    Karlsson, Erik
    11 500 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    SJS
    Hill, Adin
    2 175 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    SJS
    Knyzhov, Nikolai
    796 667 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 1
    SJS
    Vlasic, Marc-Édouard
    7 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    SJS
    Gambrell, Dylan
    1 100 000 $
    C
    RFA - 1
    SJS
    Nieto, Matt
    850 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    SJS
    Middleton, Jacob
    725 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 1
    Équipe de réserve
    SJS
    Pederson, Lane
    750 000 $ (0 $)
    C
    RFA - 2
    SJS
    Leonard, John
    925 000 $ (0 $)
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    SJS
    Merkley, Nick
    750 000 $ (0 $)
    AD, C
    RFA - 1
    SJS
    Gregor, Noah
    750 000 $ (0 $)
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1

    Unités spéciales

    Avantage numérique 1
    , .
    Hertl, T.
    Meier, T.
    Burns, B.
    Eklund, W.
    Avantage numérique 2
    Labanc, K.
    Studnicka, J.
    Balcers, R.
    Karlsson, E.
    Dahlen, J.
    Infériorité numérique 1
    Bonino, N.
    Cogliano, A.
    Knyzhov, N.
    Vlasic, M.
    Infériorité numérique 2
    Hertl, T.
    Labanc, K.
    Simek, R.
    Karlsson, E.

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    22 oct. à 14 h 27
    #1
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 3,145
    Mentions "j'aime": 998
    I don’t see a team giving you positive assets for Kane
    KMarner10, sensonfire, palhal and 2 others a aimé ceci.
    22 oct. à 14 h 34
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 68
    Mentions "j'aime": 8
    Quoting: ecupirate07
    I don’t see a team giving you positive assets for Kane


    That's what I think, but when he plays he is a good scorer with Grit. At $4M he could be good for the top 9 and he seems like someone who would excel in playoff hockey. Plus, they signed DeAngello so I am a bit reluctant to say that they wouldn't give Kane a look.
    22 oct. à 14 h 38
    #3
    Lenny7
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 8,650
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,064
    I'm a bit confused here...is Arizona retaining $2 mil on Couture for 5 years (Plus whatever money remained this year...let's leave it at $10 mil total for now though), and $750k for 4+ years ($3 mil total) on Coyle? Because the cost of getting them to do that would be hilariously high. Just the $3 mil over 4 years on Coyle would be more than a 4th+5th.

    With Kane...far more likely to see him get waived and end up in the AHL or being paid to sit home (followed by a buyout this summer) than for someone to actually give up assets for him.
    22 oct. à 14 h 46
    #4
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 10,917
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,821
    Hertl is interesting, not Couture and his contract.
    22 oct. à 14 h 47
    #5
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 7,502
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,560
    No one is going to take couture, let alone give up those assets for him.
    palhal a aimé ceci.
    22 oct. à 14 h 48
    #6
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 40,875
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,376
    Teams can spend 7m a lot better than for the newest version of Kane. Kinda the same situation with 8m Couture
    22 oct. à 14 h 49
    #7
    Rejoint: juill. 2021
    Messages: 366
    Mentions "j'aime": 190
    Outside of the deals and their values, the Coyotes can't retain 2 more they already have 2 on the books and the max is 3
    22 oct. à 15 h 31
    #8
    Quaaludes
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 980
    Mentions "j'aime": 509
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    No one is going to take couture, let alone give up those assets for him.


    Good we're happy to keep him. Enjoy paying your 4C coyle five mil lol
    FunMustBeAlways et CheechYou a aimé ceci.
    22 oct. à 15 h 44
    #9
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 7,502
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,560
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    Good we're happy to keep him. Enjoy paying your 4C coyle five mil lol


    4C is a pretty big stretch.

    Being a sharks fan, do you really want to be throwing shade at other teams for overpaying players?
    hanson493 et Connor_McJesus_97 a aimé ceci.
    22 oct. à 15 h 46
    #10
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 4,517
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,926
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    Good we're happy to keep him. Enjoy paying your 4C coyle five mil lol


    coyles probably a fringe 2c. more suited as a winger, or 3c. dont think hes overpaid especially when cap jumps
    22 oct. à 15 h 48
    #11
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 7,502
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,560
    Quoting: hanson493
    coyles probably a fringe 2c. more suited as a winger, or 3c. dont think hes overpaid especially when cap jumps


    He’s definitely definitely definitely not more suited as a winger. Very much the opposite.
    22 oct. à 15 h 50
    #12
    The right to Wright
    Rejoint: déc. 2020
    Messages: 507
    Mentions "j'aime": 116
    Imagine DeAngelo and Kane in the same lockerroom
    22 oct. à 15 h 57
    #13
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 4,517
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,926
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    He’s definitely definitely definitely not more suited as a winger. Very much the opposite.


    His best stretch of production as a bruin was as a winger lol.
    22 oct. à 16 h 14
    #14
    Lets Get Kraken
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 1,105
    Mentions "j'aime": 431
    Canes won’t trade for Kane. If Kane gets bought out, Canes might consider signing him on a 1x1 deal to make a deep run in the playoffs, but I don’t see Carolina having both Kane and DeAngelo on the roster at the same time. In terms of a Kane trade, the Sharks want out of Kane so they will have to pay a pretty penny to dump him on someone else. Kane will not return positive assets. You might get a late round pick but the cost to dump him will heavily offset the trade.
    22 oct. à 16 h 18
    #15
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 7,502
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,560
    Quoting: hanson493
    His best stretch of production as a bruin was as a winger lol.


    No it wasn’t. The Bruins have been very open about how much better he is at center. They tried him at wing. It didn’t work.
    23 oct. à 10 h 17
    #16
    Quaaludes
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 980
    Mentions "j'aime": 509
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    4C is a pretty big stretch.

    Being a sharks fan, do you really want to be throwing shade at other teams for overpaying players?


    My players are paid accordingly. As we have gotten rid of our cancer, we are dominating the league wink Your team is next
    24 oct. à 8 h 35
    #17
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 7,502
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,560
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    My players are paid accordingly. As we have gotten rid of our cancer, we are dominating the league wink Your team is next


    First off, you don’t have players. You’re a fanboy. None of this is yours. You aren’t an owner, GM, player, or coach.

    The sharks stink. Ya, they came out of the gate hot, and managed to beat three bad teams, and one okay one. Hooorayyyy! They have four of the most overpaid players in the league, and that cancer is coming back.

    You think Karlsson is paid appropriately? He’s at best an okay second pair D and is the highest paid d man in the league.
    24 oct. à 14 h 26
    #18
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 7,502
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,560
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    My players are paid accordingly. As we have gotten rid of our cancer, we are dominating the league wink Your team is next


    You were saying?
    24 oct. à 14 h 50
    #19
    King is a good coach
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 3,689
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,488
    Your lucky to dump an unprotected first to Carolina for them to do that trade
    24 oct. à 15 h 44
    #20
    Quaaludes
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 980
    Mentions "j'aime": 509
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    You were saying?


    We clearly dominated the Bs in the 3rd. Pretty close for a team that's supposed to finish bottom 3 in the league. Made the Bruins panic at the end. B's got away with a couple obvious penalties as well. I think we'll take the next one with ease wink

    Your team is very unimpressive.
    24 oct. à 15 h 50
    #21
    King is a good coach
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 3,689
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,488
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    We clearly dominated the Bs in the 3rd. Pretty close for a team that's supposed to finish bottom 3 in the league. Made the Bruins panic at the end. B's got away with a couple obvious penalties as well. I think we'll take the next one with ease wink

    Your team is very unimpressive.


    Still a loss is a loss

    I know that from experience #FIRECOLLITONANDBOWMEN
    24 oct. à 15 h 52
    #22
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 7,502
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,560
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    We clearly dominated the Bs in the 3rd. Pretty close for a team that's supposed to finish bottom 3 in the league. Made the Bruins panic at the end. B's got away with a couple obvious penalties as well. I think we'll take the next one with ease wink

    Your team is very unimpressive.


    Ah. So refs fault and even though the sharks lost they were better. Cool.

    They beat a few bad teams. Whatever. The team stinks. The contracts are horrid, and your language here makes me think the sharks could be 0-82 and you’d be saying they were actually one of the top teams in the league. Later.
    25 oct. à 9 h 18
    #23
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 7,502
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,560
    Quoting: IconicHawk
    Still a loss is a loss

    I know that from experience #FIRECOLLITONANDBOWMEN


    I’m sure he’ll figure out a way to explain all the losses. It’s pretty clear that the sharks are brutal, but he’ll tell you otherwise. Contracts are great too apparently.
    29 oct. à 19 h 22
    #24
    King is a good coach
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 3,689
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,488
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    I’m sure he’ll figure out a way to explain all the losses. It’s pretty clear that the sharks are brutal, but he’ll tell you otherwise. Contracts are great too apparently.


    My question was is the start sustainable? I think we know the answer now
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Supprimer une option
    Soumettre le sondage