SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Could this work

Équipe: 2021-22 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 22 oct. 2021
Publié: 22 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de BOS
Logo de VAN
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYI
Logo de SJS
2023
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de NSH
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $66 854 091 $0 $4 907 500 $14 645 909 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 330 674 $8 330 674 $
AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
747 500 $747 500 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
749 250 $749 250 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
900 000 $900 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
726 667 $726 667 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 oct. 2021 à 13 h 34
#1
gavinray
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 2,119
Mentions "j'aime": 541
Awful for Ottawa
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
22 oct. 2021 à 13 h 42
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 1,668
Mentions "j'aime": 772
Awful Move, Branstrom is worth so much more,

Also, Kravtsov is left-hand shot team needs a Right-hand shot. Also, his numbers are not great barely .5 pts per game in KHL, He had one hot streak that is all.
22 oct. 2021 à 13 h 43
#3
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: gavinray
Awful for Ottawa


I don't disagree, but you're gonna have to accidentally push D.J. in front of oncoming traffic if you want Brannstrom in the lineup (Which is where he should be).
22 oct. 2021 à 13 h 57
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,882
Mentions "j'aime": 11,894
I don't think it's good for Ottawa. Supposedly Ottawa has called about him, but I'm skeptical of how he would fit in Ottawa. I don't think he's shown enough to warrant a guaranteed NHL job, and he's clearly unwilling to play in the AHL. I certainly wouldn't trade Brannstrom for him
22 oct. 2021 à 14 h 24
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,832
Mentions "j'aime": 905
Rangers decline. No room for Brännström on the Rangers defense.
Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
22 oct. 2021 à 15 h 47
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,831
Mentions "j'aime": 691
Quoting: hero9154
Rangers decline. No room for Brännström on the Rangers defense.


I'd personally love to see Brannstrom step in for Nemeth, but I know it won't happen because wE nEeD tOuGhNeSs (according to Drury/Sather/Dolan)
22 oct. 2021 à 16 h 21
#7
B
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 7,860
Mentions "j'aime": 1,421
Quoting: MauriceRichard1028
I'd personally love to see Brannstrom step in for Nemeth, but I know it won't happen because wE nEeD tOuGhNeSs (according to Drury/Sather/Dolan)


That's right, plus he'd be leapfrogged by BSchneider, Jones and Robertson. Tiny Brann will have a hard time sticking in NHL
23 oct. 2021 à 13 h 30
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,455
Mentions "j'aime": 3,700
I wouldn't mind taking on Kravstov "reclamation project" but not at the expense of Brannstrom. However they have to decide what to do with Erik because his value will depreciate next season


Kravtsov for 2022 2nd round pick (TB) + Cole Reinhardt


Quoting: Fox_Czar_Cup
Tiny Brann will have a hard time sticking in NHL


Misconception. He could absolutely be a full time NHLer right now. He was already pretty decent last season at 21 y/o
23 oct. 2021 à 16 h 21
#9
B
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 7,860
Mentions "j'aime": 1,421
Quoting: Xspyrit
Misconception. He could absolutely be a full time NHLer right now. He was already pretty decent last season at 21 y/o


And still not trusted by coaches, who know a bit more about the kids than us armchair GMs/coaches
24 oct. 2021 à 11 h 13
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,455
Mentions "j'aime": 3,700
Quoting: Fox_Czar_Cup
And still not trusted by coaches, who know a bit more about the kids than us armchair GMs/coaches


This is the "uninformed public opinion"... I'll copy/paste what I already said on the subject since I'm not really "passionate" about Brannstrom and don't wish to go much further. I knew for a while that he wouldn't be in the Sens plans, basically since they drafted Sanderson. I initially thought that maybe they would move him to RD but they've been reluctant to do so since the beginning. We were wondering why until Dorion explained it... it's not an option.

So here's a summary of factors of why Brannstrom is not in the NHL actually :

- Not part of long term plans (Chabot/Sanderson/Kleven on LD)
- Doesn't require waivers unlike the 7 other D-men on 1-way contracts. No injuries currently
- They don't want him to play on RD, so less opportunities because there's already a logjam on LD
- DJ Smith simply doesn't seem to be a fan of players below 6'0
- Brannstrom will eventually play in the NHL regularly and he'll be good. Probably as soon as he leaves Ottawa
- Sens have been taking their time with several prospects. EB just turned 22 y/o, it's not like he was old for a D-man. He's the same age as Batherson rookie season last year. Drake could have played in the NHL earlier (he was over PPG in AHL at 20) but when you are rebuilding, you have the luxury to take your time.
- He's already the 2nd best offensive D-man currently signed, and the best PP QB
- His defensive issues are overstated, his transition and zone exits are already good, he knows how to move the puck. He's good when paired with Zub. Problem is Chabot also need Zub. Lack of good RDs hurt the team.
- Dorion doesn't have any idea about asset management. May I remind you that he waived Rudolfs Balcers last season when he could have waived one of Paquette, Anisimov or Galchenyuk

etc etc
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage