SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Honest Question

Créé par: HatterTParty
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 21 oct. 2021
Publié: 21 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The way things are going, this IS going to be a top 10 (minimum) draft choice in next year’s draft. Essentially, the Seth Jones acquisition will be remembered in hockey alongside the Kessel to Toronto trade that gifted the Bruins Seguin at #2 and the Avs trading duchene and getting byram at #4. So my question now is: what trade will be viewed in hindsight as worse, the panarin trade or the boqvist (I refuse to even acknowledge it as the Jones trade anymore since he hasn’t showed his worth)? Moreover, in the long run, what does this do to become relevant again? Toews and Kane are gone soon and the talent left over doesn’t come close to being a cup contender.
Transactions
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $66 941 714 $452 439 $3 415 000 $14 558 286 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
912 500 $912 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
997 500 $997 500 $
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 oct. 2021 à 23 h 15
#1
Number 1 Kahun Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 1,601
Mentions "j'aime": 1,022
Dude, stop worrying another dozen or two losses in a row they'll have everything figured out, Colliton said so!
HatterTParty et Gmonwy a aimé ceci.
21 oct. 2021 à 23 h 16
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: CFMan
Dude, stop worrying another dozen or two losses in a row they'll have everything figured out, Colliton said so!


This comment better get more than just my like 🤣👍
21 oct. 2021 à 23 h 22
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,010
Mentions "j'aime": 469
Welcome to the mediocrity club and picking 14th-17th every season and making fringe moves to sell the fanbase and never committing one way or another smile
HatterTParty a aimé ceci.
21 oct. 2021 à 23 h 35
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
It sure is a hard sell but I don't think Jones has been all bad. The team is bad and I think the coaching system has something to do with it. We also have had no puck luck the last 2 games in which we have out shot the opponents and kept them to 25 or less shots. our 5 on 5 play is likely the worst in the league currently. If this continues we may get a shot at Wright and send next years pick to CBJ.
21 oct. 2021 à 23 h 38
#5
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,841
Mentions "j'aime": 5,810
The “Boqvist” trade feels different from the ones you mentioned because it was immediately met with skeptics and almost universally hated by the hardcore fanbase. I almost think it’s more like the Karlsson trade than anything else, except Karlsson was still good at the time of his trade or something. Our only hope right now is that they keep on tanking and eventually retain their pick through some hardcore lottery luck. I say this because I don’t see a realistic way in which they can climb back into the playoff race EVEN if a lot of central teams are struggling to pick up W’s right now.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
22 oct. 2021 à 0 h 46
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
It sure is a hard sell but I don't think Jones has been all bad. The team is bad and I think the coaching system has something to do with it. We also have had no puck luck the last 2 games in which we have out shot the opponents and kept them to 25 or less shots. our 5 on 5 play is likely the worst in the league currently. If this continues we may get a shot at Wright and send next years pick to CBJ.


That’s honestly what I’m praying for, Wright fills the need for a long term 1C. Amazing point producer and good size. One can only dream now though.
Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
22 oct. 2021 à 1 h 3
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Quoting: HatterTParty
That’s honestly what I’m praying for, Wright fills the need for a long term 1C. Amazing point producer and good size. One can only dream now though.


Definitely is the dream. Kid will be a star.
22 oct. 2021 à 12 h 6
#8
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,639
Mentions "j'aime": 9,748
Modifié 22 oct. 2021 à 12 h 48
The Boqvist trade is very different than the Panarin trade. The honest response between those trades is...go look at the voting and comments on the day of the Panarin trade. Link Below. People thought CBJ won, but Panarin was a 60-65 point player that might fail in Torts system...and might go back to the KHL. The distain for the Panarin trade is PURELY hindsight. Again, the post asks to be honest...If someone told me today.....that back in June of 2017, they though Panarin would be a Hart candidate...they're just lying. It's a lie.

I can admit (just like I admit I wanted Byram over Dach) that I wanted Seth Jones as a Hawk. My issue with that trade is ALL the other stuff. Boqvist, the 2021 swap, the 2022 pick, the $9.5M contract...it's just all so much garbage. Wait the 1 freakin season STAN! Nothing about the Boqvist trade made sense from day 1. There's not hindsight there. It's immediate and was stupid on day 1.

Now going forward it's ROUGH. Stan's probably sitting there pointing to high danger chances allowed and just saying...all we need is time. So stupid, but that's probably what he's thinking. I'm HOPING (but not holding my breath) that Seth Jones will be like Campbell. At the time of the Campbell signing he was overpaid too, BUT you need to overpay a UFA for a team rebuidling. That doesn't make the trade ok. It's NOT ok. It's just a full admission that everyone of value that's older need to be traded away. Toews/Kane/Kubalik/MAF...probably the cat too. Rebuild it right. Don't go half way.

https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/73055
HatterTParty a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage