SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Mock-Draft

The best draft since 03 redone

The best draft since 03 redone

Cuvée de repêchage: 2015
Créé par: gary_bettman
Publié: 19 oct. 2021 à 13 h 19
RONDE 1ÉQUIPEORIGINALJOUEURDéTAILS
1Logo de Oilers d'EdmontonLogo de Sabres de Buffalo
2Logo de Sabres de Buffalo-
3Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona-
4Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto-
5Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline-
6Logo de Devils du New Jersey-
7Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie-
8Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus-
9Logo de Sharks de San Jose-
10Logo de Avalanche du Colorado-
11Logo de Panthers de la Floride-
12Logo de Stars de Dallas-
13Logo de Bruins de BostonLogo de Kings de Los Angeles
14Logo de Bruins de Boston-
15Logo de Bruins de BostonLogo de Flames de Calgary
16Logo de Islanders de New YorkLogo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
17Logo de Jets de Winnipeg-
18Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa-
19Logo de Red Wings de Detroit-
20Logo de Wild du Minnesota-
21Logo de Sénateurs d'OttawaLogo de Islanders de New York
22Logo de Capitals de Washington-
23Logo de Canucks de Vancouver-
24Logo de Flyers de PhiladelphieLogo de Predators de Nashville
25Logo de Jets de WinnipegLogo de Blues de St-Louis
Adin Hill (+51 )
26Logo de Canadiens de Montréal-
27Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim-
28Logo de Islanders de New YorkLogo de Rangers de New York
29Logo de Blue Jackets de ColumbusLogo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
Vince Dunn (+27 )
30Logo de Coyotes de l'ArizonaLogo de Blackhawks de Chicago
19 oct. 2021 à 13 h 35
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,994
Mentions "j'aime": 11,997
All the drama aside, Eichel is still the obvious number 2, by a significant margin. Having a C who can do what he can is worth more that Marner, points be damned.
BeterChiarelli et PrisonBull a aimé ceci.
19 oct. 2021 à 14 h 0
#2
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,482
Mentions "j'aime": 6,455
I think Werenski slid way too far. I think he's still worth taking somewhere in that cluster of Bruins picks.

Mangiapane and Bear should be in this too. I'd reckon over Roslovic and Balcers respectively.
19 oct. 2021 à 14 h 16
#3
Démarrer sujet
IamAlwaysRight
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 2,681
Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
I think Werenski slid way too far. I think he's still worth taking somewhere in that cluster of Bruins picks.

Mangiapane and Bear should be in this too. I'd reckon over Roslovic and Balcers respectively.


Agree about Mangiapane. Forgot he was here. Have to disagree on Bear though, I see him as a early 2nd.
BeterChiarelli a aimé ceci.
19 oct. 2021 à 14 h 18
#4
Démarrer sujet
IamAlwaysRight
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 2,681
Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
All the drama aside, Eichel is still the obvious number 2, by a significant margin. Having a C who can do what he can is worth more that Marner, points be damned.


Yeah I won't argue your point. I think we've yet to see the best from Marner and I'm no Toronto fan at all. Marner despite the drama and his contract is a ridiculously good player.
19 oct. 2021 à 15 h 17
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,351
Mentions "j'aime": 11,726
still crazy how bad Boston blew this draft
19 oct. 2021 à 15 h 49
#6
Démarrer sujet
IamAlwaysRight
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 2,681
Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
Quoting: GeneralLandro
still crazy how bad Boston blew this draft


They could have had Aho, Barzal and Chabot LOL
19 oct. 2021 à 15 h 53
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,351
Mentions "j'aime": 11,726
Quoting: gary_bettman
They could have had Aho, Barzal and Chabot LOL


Seriously man

I’m in awe every time I see it again
20 oct. 2021 à 15 h 48
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 4,424
Mentions "j'aime": 3,147
Quoting: GeneralLandro
still crazy how bad Boston blew this draft


Quoting: gary_bettman
They could have had Aho, Barzal and Chabot LOL


And Kaprizov, Boston literally traded the 5th round pick used to draft him to Minnesota because Sweeney thought he wouldn't have enough money left over to pay everyone once they were all on the roster. Instead, he chose to move off later round picks to offset the difference.

The Wild didn't have a 5th rounder going into the draft, and gave Boston our 2016 5th in return.

Otherwise, why and how does Eriksson-Ek drop?
gary_bettman a aimé ceci.
20 oct. 2021 à 16 h 4
#9
Démarrer sujet
IamAlwaysRight
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 2,681
Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
Quoting: RazWild
And Kaprizov, Boston literally traded the 5th round pick used to draft him to Minnesota because Sweeney thought he wouldn't have enough money left over to pay everyone once they were all on the roster. Instead, he chose to move off later round picks to offset the difference.

The Wild didn't have a 5th rounder going into the draft, and gave Boston our 2016 5th in return.

Otherwise, why and how does Eriksson-Ek drop?


Could probably swap Ek with Garland but IMO he isn't higher than that.
20 oct. 2021 à 17 h 34
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,351
Mentions "j'aime": 11,726
Quoting: RazWild
And Kaprizov, Boston literally traded the 5th round pick used to draft him to Minnesota because Sweeney thought he wouldn't have enough money left over to pay everyone once they were all on the roster. Instead, he chose to move off later round picks to offset the difference.

The Wild didn't have a 5th rounder going into the draft, and gave Boston our 2016 5th in return.

Otherwise, why and how does Eriksson-Ek drop?


Oh man, I was not aware it got better!!!!
20 oct. 2021 à 17 h 43
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 4,424
Mentions "j'aime": 3,147
Quoting: gary_bettman
Could probably swap Ek with Garland but IMO he isn't higher than that.


Ek is as good as, if not slightly better than, Cirelli is. So that doesn't make much sense. He finished 4th in Selke voting last year, and just had a hat trick last night. He's finally getting his shot to play up in the lineup now on our top line with Kaprizov and Zuccarello.

I don't think you know just how good he actually is. He is definitely better than Garland, by a mile. You could argue over Werenski and Boeser, but if he's not than Cirelli needs to be moved down. Cirelli has had the benefit of playing on a better and deeper team and also having better linemates, top six linemates anyway.
20 oct. 2021 à 17 h 53
#12
Démarrer sujet
IamAlwaysRight
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 2,681
Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Oh man, I was not aware it got better!!!!


But wait, Boston acquired their first pick in this draft from LA in the Jones trade. They then traded Martin Jones to SJ for a 2016 1st (Jones was good then and took SJ to the finals in 2016) and they used the 2016 1st from SJ to draft Trent Frederic when they could have had Adam Fox, Carter Hart, Alex DeBrincat, Samuel Girard or Jordan Kyrou. Yeah.
GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
20 oct. 2021 à 17 h 54
#13
Démarrer sujet
IamAlwaysRight
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 2,681
Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
Quoting: RazWild
Ek is as good as, if not slightly better than, Cirelli is. So that doesn't make much sense. He finished 4th in Selke voting last year, and just had a hat trick last night. He's finally getting his shot to play up in the lineup now on our top line with Kaprizov and Zuccarello.

I don't think you know just how good he actually is. He is definitely better than Garland, by a mile. You could argue over Werenski and Boeser, but if he's not than Cirelli needs to be moved down. Cirelli has had the benefit of playing on a better and deeper team and also having better linemates, top six linemates anyway.


Thats pretty subjective and you are clearly wearing your green tinted glasses.

I won't argue this. You're a Wild fan and you can go have this conversation with a Tampa fan. I don't care.
20 oct. 2021 à 18 h 46
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 4,424
Mentions "j'aime": 3,147
Quoting: gary_bettman
Thats pretty subjective and you are clearly wearing your green tinted glasses.

I won't argue this. You're a Wild fan and you can go have this conversation with a Tampa fan. I don't care.


How?

I clearly stated that both Werenski and Boeser could objectively be better than Eriksson-Ek. I've watched more than enough of Garland to know which is the better player. And your being subjective in your own opinion that Cirelli is higher than those two. I gave my reasoning for why I disagree. And I don't have a problem with your opinion, at all. Take that for what you will. It matters not.

If you don't want to debate about it, that's fine. I don't particularly care either way, either. I also think Hintz isn't high enough and should be between Kaprizov and Chabot. And Beauvillier should be much lower, under Blackwood. But you have your opinion and I have mine.
29 oct. 2021 à 3 h 11
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,507
Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
I think Werenski slid way too far. I think he's still worth taking somewhere in that cluster of Bruins picks.

Mangiapane and Bear should be in this too. I'd reckon over Roslovic and Balcers respectively.


Id have him 10th here.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage