SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Eichel

Créé par: FilthyMitts05
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 16 oct. 2021
Publié: 16 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Im not super good with their prospects or young guys but I tried to do my research on them.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Frederic, Trent
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
BOS
  1. Burns, Brent (3 500 000 $ retained)
2.
SJS
  1. Kassian, Zack
  2. Yamamoto, Kailer
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Future Considerations
EDM
  1. Hertl, Tomas (2 500 000 $ retained)
3.
SJS
    Mutual Contract termination
    4.
    BUF
    1. Megna, Jaycob
    2. Middleton, Jake
    3. Vlasic, Marc-Édouard
    4. Wiesblatt, Ozzy
    5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
    6. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
    7. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
    Détails additionnels:
    An additional second if Eichel plays more than 50 games this year
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de MIN
    2023
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    2024
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2481 500 000 $69 120 000 $0 $677 500 $12 380 000 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AG
    RFA - 5
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 175 000 $1 175 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    500 000 $500 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    DG
    UFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    850 833 $850 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    DG
    RFA - 3
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    796 667 $796 667 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    16 oct. 2021 à 12 h 24
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 27,133
    Mentions "j'aime": 14,147
    If vlasic says yes, so do I. 2 lottery picks baby

    Boston says no though and Edmonton too
    16 oct. 2021 à 12 h 27
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 6,560
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,278
    I’m curious cause I don’t know if San Jose does this. Seems like a lot for no protection on the 2022 or 2023 picks. Guessing that’s also for Vlasic, but it seems like a lot.
    FilthyMitts05 a aimé ceci.
    16 oct. 2021 à 12 h 29
    #3
    Démarrer sujet
    Future GM
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 1,712
    Mentions "j'aime": 434
    Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
    If vlasic says yes, so do I. 2 lottery picks baby

    Boston says no though and Edmonton too


    Why would edmonton say no
    16 oct. 2021 à 12 h 31
    #4
    No regretzkys
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 804
    Mentions "j'aime": 389
    Buffalo is gonna want more readily available talent. A 2024 1st rounder doesn't help all that much.

    To get Eichel you've got to centre the deal around Meier or Eklund. Can't just throw a bunch of picks at them without at least one premium tangible piece.
    gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    16 oct. 2021 à 12 h 32
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 5,204
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
    The Sharks are literally one of if not the last team which should pursue Eichel. There’s just no reasonable price which is worth giving up our most valuable assets for.


    Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
    I’m curious cause I don’t know if San Jose does this. Seems like a lot for no protection on the 2022 or 2023 picks. Guessing that’s also for Vlasic, but it seems like a lot.


    A single first going anywhere for any reason is an instant no from me lol. So hard decline on this one
    Klara, Bias_it_self et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    16 oct. 2021 à 12 h 35
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 6,560
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,278
    Modifié 16 oct. 2021 à 12 h 43
    Quoting: FunMustBeAlways
    The Sharks are literally one of if not the last team which should pursue Eichel. There’s just no reasonable price which is worth giving up our most valuable assets for.

    A single first going anywhere for any reason is an instant no from me lol. So hard decline on this one


    That’s what I figured
    gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    16 oct. 2021 à 12 h 46
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 27,133
    Mentions "j'aime": 14,147
    Quoting: MadLin27
    Buffalo is gonna want more readily available talent. A 2024 1st rounder doesn't help all that much.

    To get Eichel you've got to centre the deal around Meier or Eklund. Can't just throw a bunch of picks at them without at least one premium tangible piece.


    That isn't true at all
    Capitalfail67 a aimé ceci.
    16 oct. 2021 à 12 h 53
    #8
    No regretzkys
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 804
    Mentions "j'aime": 389
    Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
    That isn't true at all


    Not sure what part you're referring to, but a 2024 pick that won't be an impact player in the NHL until 2027 is not what the Sabres are looking for...
    Sabres say no to pretty much any deal that doesn't include one of those two guys.

    If those picks are unprotected then sure, but thats not usually how it works.
    gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    16 oct. 2021 à 12 h 53
    #9
    Caps fan idk why
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2016
    Messages: 11,237
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,344
    Quoting: MadLin27
    Buffalo is gonna want more readily available talent. A 2024 1st rounder doesn't help all that much.

    To get Eichel you've got to centre the deal around Meier or Eklund. Can't just throw a bunch of picks at them without at least one premium tangible piece.


    Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
    That isn't true at all


    Buddy next 2 drafts have 4 yes 4!!!! A+ prospects.... translation 4 players that are expected to be Matthews (the last A+ prospect) good and the odds of Eichel magically making the Sharks good arent good. Youd be crazy to say no to this.... Like getting 2 chances at winning the lottery
    gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    16 oct. 2021 à 12 h 55
    #10
    No regretzkys
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 804
    Mentions "j'aime": 389
    Quoting: Capitalfail67
    Buddy next 2 drafts have 4 yes 4!!!! A+ prospects.... translation 4 players that are expected to be Matthews (the last A+ prospect) good and the odds of Eichel magically making the Sharks good arent good. Youd be crazy to say no to this.... Like getting 2 chances at winning the lottery


    If we are assuming these picks aren't lottery protected than yes. I was assuming lottery protection, but I guess you can't if you're trading picks for 3 years straight
    16 oct. 2021 à 13 h 2
    #11
    Caps fan idk why
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2016
    Messages: 11,237
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,344
    Quoting: MadLin27
    If we are assuming these picks aren't lottery protected than yes. I was assuming lottery protection, but I guess you can't if you're trading picks for 3 years straight


    he didnt have the picks protected in the trade. Wouldn't be the first time the Sharks didnt protect a pick
    Eli a aimé ceci.
    16 oct. 2021 à 13 h 6
    #12
    No regretzkys
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 804
    Mentions "j'aime": 389
    Quoting: Capitalfail67
    he didnt have the picks protected in the trade. Wouldn't be the first time the Sharks didnt protect a pick


    I realize that now.
    Capitalfail67 a aimé ceci.
    16 oct. 2021 à 14 h 30
    #13
    Who adds what?
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 13,677
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
    Quoting: FilthyMitts05
    Why would edmonton say no


    https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/2848009
    16 oct. 2021 à 14 h 48
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 11,496
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,562
    Not sure why Boston would want Burns
    Gofnut999 a aimé ceci.
    16 oct. 2021 à 14 h 50
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 19,652
    Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
    No from Boston
    16 oct. 2021 à 19 h 27
    #16
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 14,017
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
    Burns sucks and his contract is brutal. Take out the first and frederic and it’s somewhat reasonable
    Eli a aimé ceci.
    17 oct. 2021 à 2 h 13
    #17
    IamAlwaysRight
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 2,681
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    Burns sucks and his contract is brutal. Take out the first and frederic and it’s somewhat reasonable


    Lol u just hate sharks. Informed ignorance.
    17 oct. 2021 à 9 h 0
    #18
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 14,017
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    Lol u just hate sharks. Informed ignorance.


    Do you disagree? I have nothing against the sharks, but they’re a mess
    FilthyMitts05 a aimé ceci.
    17 oct. 2021 à 11 h 34
    #19
    IamAlwaysRight
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 2,681
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    Do you disagree? I have nothing against the sharks, but they’re a mess


    Informed Realism
    Eli a aimé ceci.
    17 oct. 2021 à 13 h 58
    #20
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 14,017
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
    Quoting: gary_bettman
    Informed Realism


    Do you have counterpoints? Any argument of your own? Or is the plan here to just distract by being snarky?
    FilthyMitts05 a aimé ceci.
    18 oct. 2021 à 0 h 7
    #21
    IamAlwaysRight
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 2,681
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
    Quoting: CMcAvoy73
    Do you have counterpoints? Any argument of your own? Or is the plan here to just distract by being snarky?


    😉
    FilthyMitts05 a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage