SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

All Aboard the Eichel Cycle - Year End Team

Créé par: jcambers
Équipe: 2021-22 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 16 oct. 2021
Publié: 16 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This is my idea of what the team might look like by the end of the year with Monahan, Johnny, and some younger pieces going out for Eichel.

Let's face it... many of us have Monahan being shipped out in order to for us to try and land Eichel - it might need to happen both from a roster and salary perspective. BUT... Monahan has a NTC and he's not going to waive it for Buffalo. So, what needs to happen? Monahan will likely have to be traded elsewhere and gain an asset that can be added to Eichel's BUF bounty.

Also, the Johnny trade is a salary move since he'll be signing elsewhere next year anyway and we need AAV room for Tkachuk.
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (MIN)
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (MIN)
2.
BUF
  1. Dubé, Dillon
  2. Gudbranson, Erik
  3. Välimäki, Juuso
  4. Zary, Connor
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
  6. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (MIN)
  7. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
*If Eichel plays more than 35 games in the 2021 season, BUF receives the higher of the 2023 1st Rd Picks.
*2023 3rd Rd Pick is for taking Gudbranson and his salary (to make room for Eichel)
3.
NYR
  1. Gaudreau, Johnny
Détails additionnels:
*Johnny signs long-term deal with NYR
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de FLA
Logo de MIN
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $72 177 500 $0 $0 $9 322 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
827 500 $827 500 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
912 500 $912 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 oct. 2021 à 9 h 38
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,233
Mentions "j'aime": 19,505
Monahan is worth more, Minny has been very open aboit not wanting him anyways.

5 guaranteed 1sts for a smashed sportscar? No thanks
16 oct. 2021 à 9 h 38
#2
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,625
Mentions "j'aime": 12,352
Just what the Rangers need, another LW.. Lol
16 oct. 2021 à 9 h 40
#3
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,252
Mentions "j'aime": 10,597
If Flames were to trade for Eichel it would to be on a line with Tkachuk and Gaudreau
16 oct. 2021 à 10 h 8
#4
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,418
Mentions "j'aime": 22,631
Modifié 16 oct. 2021 à 10 h 16
You seem to of the believe teams have cap space to take on high priced players without sending cap back to the Flames.
Minni and Rangers don't have the cap for those trades, and why should they. Monahan is kinda meh, and Rangers shouldn't be giving all that for a rental, and they can't afford Gaudereau next year.
GophersBenJ a aimé ceci.
16 oct. 2021 à 10 h 17
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,108
Mentions "j'aime": 2,000
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Monahan is worth more, Minny has been very open aboit not wanting him anyways.

5 guaranteed 1sts for a smashed sportscar? No thanks


Keep it simple, like you’ve done for a while. Monahan, Zary, Dube, first. Buffalo promises Monahan to hold half salary and trades him elsewhere thus making him more valuable and can damn near pick a destination for probably similar returns. Buffalo ends up with Zary, a couple firsts, and Dube (any additional stuff for holding the salary). No need to modify an already solid proposal just to muddy the water.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
16 oct. 2021 à 10 h 33
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,233
Mentions "j'aime": 19,505
Quoting: Lsendel3
Keep it simple, like you’ve done for a while. Monahan, Zary, Dube, first. Buffalo promises Monahan to hold half salary and trades him elsewhere thus making him more valuable and can damn near pick a destination for probably similar returns. Buffalo ends up with Zary, a couple firsts, and Dube (any additional stuff for holding the salary). No need to modify an already solid proposal just to muddy the water.


Well it would just be constructed as a 3-way trade to begin with. And with Brisson running the show now that is very possible (he made the Duchene trade happen).

As I actually said in a post to someone else like 5 minutes ago I think my original package may even be on the high side now (at least in terms of guaranteed assets) since its been nearly 4 months since i proposed that package. Imo it would be more likely to include Gudbranson instead of Dube and make it 2 conditional 1sts.

The trade wont happen before tonight's game anyways so we'll get to see how Monahan does and maybe get a better idea on his value (how back to normal is he)
16 oct. 2021 à 10 h 38
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 1,907
Mentions "j'aime": 449
Minnesota doesn't want Sean Monahan. This has been talked about lots om here. One of the player Minnesota wild insider reporter has been clear about our gm not wanting; having any interest in is Sean Monahan. No team especially Minnesota is going to give up 1st round pick so calgary can get better player in eichel
16 oct. 2021 à 10 h 45
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,108
Mentions "j'aime": 2,000
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Well it would just be constructed as a 3-way trade to begin with. And with Brisson running the show now that is very possible (he made the Duchene trade happen).

As I actually said in a post to someone else like 5 minutes ago I think my original package may even be on the high side now (at least in terms of guaranteed assets) since its been nearly 4 months since i proposed that package. Imo it would be more likely to include Gudbranson instead of Dube and make it 2 conditional 1sts.

The trade wont happen before tonight's game anyways so we'll get to see how Monahan does and maybe get a better idea on his value (how back to normal is he)


I would be fine with that, one for sure first one conditional. At the same time, I know everyone thinks the time spent drops the value. Perceived for sure, but at this point, it’s very apparent Adam’s won’t drop the value too much. In what will actually happen, it’s gonna be wild to see which fan base thinks it’s too little/too much
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
16 oct. 2021 à 10 h 53
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,233
Mentions "j'aime": 19,505
Quoting: Lsendel3
I would be fine with that, one for sure first one conditional. At the same time, I know everyone thinks the time spent drops the value. Perceived for sure, but at this point, it’s very apparent Adam’s won’t drop the value too much. In what will actually happen, it’s gonna be wild to see which fan base thinks it’s too little/too much


Im not even sure if it will be 1 for sure 1st. I would say 1 1st based on results and 1 with a mild condition based on him playing like at least half of the next season

Im not saying the value has dropped, im saying my perspective has changed due to me expecting way more conditions than before
16 oct. 2021 à 11 h 8
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,108
Mentions "j'aime": 2,000
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Im not even sure if it will be 1 for sure 1st. I would say 1 1st based on results and 1 with a mild condition based on him playing like at least half of the next season

Im not saying the value has dropped, im saying my perspective has changed due to me expecting way more conditions than before


I doubt Adam’s accepts a deal with no first guaranteed. But again we’ll see what happens
16 oct. 2021 à 17 h 0
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,233
Mentions "j'aime": 19,505
Quoting: Lsendel3
I doubt Adam’s accepts a deal with no first guaranteed. But again we’ll see what happens


And right now a team trading for him cant guarantee he ever plays again or comes back wven remotely as good as he was. Conditional picks are the only insurance the buying team can get
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage