Forums/Armchair-GM

All Aboard the Eichel Cycle - Year End Team

Créé par: jcambers
Date de création initiale: 16 oct. 2021
Publié: 16 oct. 2021
Équipe: 2021-22 Flames de Calgary
Explications
This is my idea of what the team might look like by the end of the year with Monahan, Johnny, and some younger pieces going out for Eichel.

Let's face it... many of us have Monahan being shipped out in order to for us to try and land Eichel - it might need to happen both from a roster and salary perspective. BUT... Monahan has a NTC and he's not going to waive it for Buffalo. So, what needs to happen? Monahan will likely have to be traded elsewhere and gain an asset that can be added to Eichel's BUF bounty.

Also, the Johnny trade is a salary move since he'll be signing elsewhere next year anyway and we need AAV room for Tkachuk.
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. 2023 1e round pick (MIN)
  2. 2022 4e round pick (MIN)
MIN
  1. Monahan, Sean
  2. Philp, Luke
2.
CGY
  1. Eichel, Jack
BUF
  1. Dubé, Dillon
  2. Välimäki, Juuso
  3. Zary, Connor
  4. Gudbranson, Erik
  5. 2022 1e round pick (CGY)
  6. 2023 1e round pick (MIN)
  7. 2023 3e round pick (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
*If Eichel plays more than 35 games in the 2021 season, BUF receives the higher of the 2023 1st Rd Picks.
*2023 3rd Rd Pick is for taking Gudbranson and his salary (to make room for Eichel)
3.
CGY
  1. Strome, Ryan
  2. Kravtsov, Vitali
NYR
  1. Gaudreau, Johnny
Détails additionnels:
*Johnny signs long-term deal with NYR
Rachats de contrats
  • Troy Brouwer: 1 500 000 $
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
2022
CGY
FLA
MIN
CGY
CGY
2023
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
2024
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS BONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $79 265 000 $0 $0 $2 235 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
CGY
Tkachuk, Matthew
7 000 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
BUF
Eichel, Jack
10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 5
CGY
Coleman, Blake
4 900 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 6
CGY
Mangiapane, Andrew
2 425 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
CGY
Lindholm, Elias
4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
NYR
Strome, Ryan
4 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
CGY
Lucic, Milan
5 250 000 $
AG
NMC NTC
UFA - 2
CGY
Backlund, Mikael
5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 3
CGY
Pitlick, Tyler
1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
CGY
Duehr, Walker
827 500 $
AD
RFA - 2
CGY
Gawdin, Glenn
750 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
CGY
Lewis, Trevor
800 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
CGY
Hanifin, Noah
4 950 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
CGY
Andersson, Rasmus
4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
CGY
Markström, Jacob
6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
CGY
Zadorov, Nikita
3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
CGY
Tanev, Christopher
4 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
CGY
Vladar, Daniel
750 000 $
G
RFA - 2
CGY
Kylington, Oliver
750 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
CGY
Stone, Michael
750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
CGY
Mackey, Connor
912 500 $
DG
RFA - 2
CGY
Richardson, Brad
800 000 $
C
UFA - 1
CGY
Ritchie, Brett
900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
CGY
Phillips, Matthew
750 000 $
C
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 oct. à 9 h 38
#1
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 20,355
Mentions "j'aime": 10,349
Monahan is worth more, Minny has been very open aboit not wanting him anyways.

5 guaranteed 1sts for a smashed sportscar? No thanks
16 oct. à 9 h 38
#2
MisstheWhalers
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 15,263
Mentions "j'aime": 6,848
Just what the Rangers need, another LW.. Lol
16 oct. à 9 h 40
#3
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 11,129
Mentions "j'aime": 5,883
If Flames were to trade for Eichel it would to be on a line with Tkachuk and Gaudreau
16 oct. à 10 h 8
#4
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 40,847
Mentions "j'aime": 12,359
Modifié 16 oct. à 10 h 16
You seem to of the believe teams have cap space to take on high priced players without sending cap back to the Flames.
Minni and Rangers don't have the cap for those trades, and why should they. Monahan is kinda meh, and Rangers shouldn't be giving all that for a rental, and they can't afford Gaudereau next year.
CAPDumba a aimé ceci.
16 oct. à 10 h 17
#5
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 1,145
Mentions "j'aime": 687
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Monahan is worth more, Minny has been very open aboit not wanting him anyways.

5 guaranteed 1sts for a smashed sportscar? No thanks


Keep it simple, like you’ve done for a while. Monahan, Zary, Dube, first. Buffalo promises Monahan to hold half salary and trades him elsewhere thus making him more valuable and can damn near pick a destination for probably similar returns. Buffalo ends up with Zary, a couple firsts, and Dube (any additional stuff for holding the salary). No need to modify an already solid proposal just to muddy the water.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
16 oct. à 10 h 33
#6
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 20,355
Mentions "j'aime": 10,349
Quoting: Lsendel3
Keep it simple, like you’ve done for a while. Monahan, Zary, Dube, first. Buffalo promises Monahan to hold half salary and trades him elsewhere thus making him more valuable and can damn near pick a destination for probably similar returns. Buffalo ends up with Zary, a couple firsts, and Dube (any additional stuff for holding the salary). No need to modify an already solid proposal just to muddy the water.


Well it would just be constructed as a 3-way trade to begin with. And with Brisson running the show now that is very possible (he made the Duchene trade happen).

As I actually said in a post to someone else like 5 minutes ago I think my original package may even be on the high side now (at least in terms of guaranteed assets) since its been nearly 4 months since i proposed that package. Imo it would be more likely to include Gudbranson instead of Dube and make it 2 conditional 1sts.

The trade wont happen before tonight's game anyways so we'll get to see how Monahan does and maybe get a better idea on his value (how back to normal is he)
16 oct. à 10 h 38
#7
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 633
Mentions "j'aime": 142
Minnesota doesn't want Sean Monahan. This has been talked about lots om here. One of the player Minnesota wild insider reporter has been clear about our gm not wanting; having any interest in is Sean Monahan. No team especially Minnesota is going to give up 1st round pick so calgary can get better player in eichel
16 oct. à 10 h 45
#8
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 1,145
Mentions "j'aime": 687
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Well it would just be constructed as a 3-way trade to begin with. And with Brisson running the show now that is very possible (he made the Duchene trade happen).

As I actually said in a post to someone else like 5 minutes ago I think my original package may even be on the high side now (at least in terms of guaranteed assets) since its been nearly 4 months since i proposed that package. Imo it would be more likely to include Gudbranson instead of Dube and make it 2 conditional 1sts.

The trade wont happen before tonight's game anyways so we'll get to see how Monahan does and maybe get a better idea on his value (how back to normal is he)


I would be fine with that, one for sure first one conditional. At the same time, I know everyone thinks the time spent drops the value. Perceived for sure, but at this point, it’s very apparent Adam’s won’t drop the value too much. In what will actually happen, it’s gonna be wild to see which fan base thinks it’s too little/too much
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
16 oct. à 10 h 53
#9
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 20,355
Mentions "j'aime": 10,349
Quoting: Lsendel3
I would be fine with that, one for sure first one conditional. At the same time, I know everyone thinks the time spent drops the value. Perceived for sure, but at this point, it’s very apparent Adam’s won’t drop the value too much. In what will actually happen, it’s gonna be wild to see which fan base thinks it’s too little/too much


Im not even sure if it will be 1 for sure 1st. I would say 1 1st based on results and 1 with a mild condition based on him playing like at least half of the next season

Im not saying the value has dropped, im saying my perspective has changed due to me expecting way more conditions than before
16 oct. à 11 h 8
#10
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 1,145
Mentions "j'aime": 687
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Im not even sure if it will be 1 for sure 1st. I would say 1 1st based on results and 1 with a mild condition based on him playing like at least half of the next season

Im not saying the value has dropped, im saying my perspective has changed due to me expecting way more conditions than before


I doubt Adam’s accepts a deal with no first guaranteed. But again we’ll see what happens
16 oct. à 17 h 0
#11
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 20,355
Mentions "j'aime": 10,349
Quoting: Lsendel3
I doubt Adam’s accepts a deal with no first guaranteed. But again we’ll see what happens


And right now a team trading for him cant guarantee he ever plays again or comes back wven remotely as good as he was. Conditional picks are the only insurance the buying team can get
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Supprimer une option
Soumettre le sondage