Modifié 16 oct. 2021 à 10 h 0
Quoting: Tjm220
Buffalo is not going to retain any money for five years. If his deal weren’t so long you’d have a better chance. You are most likely correct, but half a million would not be a deal breaker.
Quoting: Alfie11
You forget that their management is horrendous lmao... The Sabres made a great move signing Karmanos as "Associate GM". The trades were much after he came aboard. The other NHL GM's knew Adams was over his head and took advantage of him (Hall for a 2nd and Montour for a 3rd, should have been at least a 1st and 2nd). They knew this by the UFA's he signed and when he let Larsson walk.
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Never said they were equal. Not sute how thats related at all. This may be all the Sabres get for Jack. If I were the Sabres GM I would ask for the 2023 2nd be conditional and make it the 2022 first without conditions.
Quoting: sabres89
Poor take. The owner has made many poor decisions in his time owning the Sabres, but he hasn't been cheap. You are correct when he first came to Buffalo and he built the Harbor center and over paid for the Bills. But there were reports that STL would have given more for O'Reilly if Buffalo paid the bonus and his terrible decision to fire all of the scouts and took other cost cutting measures. So initially I was all for Kim and Terry, lately not so much.
IMO a little light but may be what Buffalo gets.
I would definitely prefer the 2022 first and drop the conditions on the second.
Gudbranson does not fit into the Sabres future.
If the Sabres could flip Monahan for a first and second and Gudbranson for a fifth, then I think I would take it.
Two firsts (especially they were both in 2022), two seconds, fifth and Zary is not great, but it would end the Eichel saga.