SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Just make these the lines

Créé par: Kyle_Davidson
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 14 oct. 2021
Publié: 14 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I’ve seen enough of TJ in that first game to know he’s only a number 1C in the preseason. While I don’t have anything specifically against Carpenter and Khaira, I don’t see what they bring to the team that Gaudette and Strome can’t do better. Speaking of better, that’s what Seth Jones needs to be, and I don’t want the hear it from the guy anymore, I want to see it. IMO playing 27 minutes or whatever he did last night is fine, but since very few of them were good minutes I’m hard pressed to figure out a reason why he played for so long. My takeaways are that he is a good skater, but doesn't have much of a shot, and has only a basic ability to run a PP or drive an offense. He looks like he may pick up a bunch of secondary assists, but that’s probably it. In conclusion Boqvist is better.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $66 029 214 $452 439 $3 415 000 $15 470 786 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
997 500 $997 500 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 oct. 2021 à 10 h 16
#1
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,786
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746

MatthewsFan a aimé ceci.
14 oct. 2021 à 10 h 39
#2
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,536
Mentions "j'aime": 9,582
Quoting: Stan_Bowman



Not a coincidence that the ice time leader is at the bottom...and ice time laggered is at the top. That's what happens when the team is overall bad. Flawed stat for a single game because Kaner was terrible too. That doesn't mean Seth Jones was good. He was terrible for the 1st 10 minutes of the game. Not an excuse. He needs to be better. Those bottom 5 guys ALL need to be better.
villenash a aimé ceci.
14 oct. 2021 à 10 h 49
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
Big mistake to not have Strome in the game. However, I wouldn't put both Strome and Borgstrom on the same line as they both aren't good at defense. So far, I think Borgstrom is another Strome with less offense which isn't a good think. I would sit Borgstrom and play Gaudette up on the RW. I thought Carps had a decent game.
JackBurton a aimé ceci.
14 oct. 2021 à 10 h 59
#4
Chicago Blackhawks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 1,026
Mentions "j'aime": 408
Quoting: exo2769
Not a coincidence that the ice time leader is at the bottom...and ice time laggered is at the top. That's what happens when the team is overall bad. Flawed stat for a single game because Kaner was terrible too. That doesn't mean Seth Jones was good. He was terrible for the 1st 10 minutes of the game. Not an excuse. He needs to be better. Those bottom 5 guys ALL need to be better.


Hate to say it, but this is all pointless discourse until they sack that dip**** in the suit and, at the bare minimum, hire a competent coach.

Gallant was right there the whole time...
14 oct. 2021 à 11 h 3
#5
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,536
Mentions "j'aime": 9,582
Quoting: JackBurton
Hate to say it, but this is all pointless discourse until they sack that dip**** in the suit and, at the bare minimum, hire a competent coach.

Gallant was right there the whole time...


I'm not saying you're wrong. I just tend toward giving coaches more time than most. Too many times system changes occur in the middle of a season and that's the exact reason things fall apart. If we're going down...go down with the plan in place vs being wishy washy.
14 oct. 2021 à 11 h 5
#6
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: Stan_Bowman



Seth Jones Neutral Zone Defense rating the past 5 years:

2016-17: 92nd percentile (as in better than 92% of all skaters)
2017-18: 93rd percentile
2018-19: 82nd percentile
2019-20: 7th percentile
2020-21: 2nd percentile

9.5 till 2029 😢
14 oct. 2021 à 12 h 30
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Stan_Bowman



So essentially, this chart kinda proves two things.

1) the Blackhawks, as an organization, completely suck at the analytics side of hockey, and
2) why the hell does JC still have a job? He clearly can’t get the best out of this team so why do they pretend he’s capable of doing so?
14 oct. 2021 à 12 h 38
#8
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,786
Mentions "j'aime": 5,746
Quoting: HatterTParty
So essentially, this chart kinda proves two things.

1) the Blackhawks, as an organization, completely suck at the analytics side of hockey, and
2) why the hell does JC still have a job? He clearly can’t get the best out of this team so why do they pretend he’s capable of doing so?

Wouldn’t go so far as to say “prove” but yeah this team suck in just about every aspect that matters.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage