SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Thats so sad Anyways

Créé par: Kyle_Davidson
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 13 oct. 2021
Publié: 13 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
CHI
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $60 129 214 $452 439 $3 415 000 $21 370 786 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
997 500 $997 500 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 oct. 2021 à 22 h 47
#1
Rangers 2023
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 19,043
Mentions "j'aime": 5,430
Too late
13 oct. 2021 à 22 h 49
#2
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,595
Mentions "j'aime": 9,676
He's been ROUGH
Pensfan89 a aimé ceci.
13 oct. 2021 à 23 h 12
#3
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,429
Mentions "j'aime": 22,636
Quoting: exo2769
He's been ROUGH


To think Pollock just signed for 6.25m X 8.
Pensfan89 a aimé ceci.
13 oct. 2021 à 23 h 17
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,222
Mentions "j'aime": 2,162
Quoting: exo2769
He's been ROUGH


Yeah him and McCabe are lookin like bad investments. If you need me I'll be rooting for Trevor Zegras until Bowman is fired
Pensfan89 a aimé ceci.
13 oct. 2021 à 23 h 29
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 5,603
Mentions "j'aime": 5,707
Quoting: SlickWilly
Yeah him and McCabe are lookin like bad investments. If you need me I'll be rooting for Trevor Zegras until Bowman is fired


Colliton first please. How many seasons can the hawks have a bottom 5 defense before they fire this guy
CFMan et Pensfan89 a aimé ceci.
13 oct. 2021 à 23 h 42
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,222
Mentions "j'aime": 2,162
Quoting: SociallyHawkward
Colliton first please. How many seasons can the hawks have a bottom 5 defense before they fire this guy


They havent had talent in the last 5 seasons. Keith and Seabrook have been the top defensive players over that span and they havent been good since 2016. His best players to work with have been ****ing gustafsson and Murphy. Doesnt look like its getting better any time soon unless McCabe and Jones are just trying to hustle everyone.
13 oct. 2021 à 23 h 44
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,222
Mentions "j'aime": 2,162
Quoting: SlickWilly
They havent had talent in the last 5 seasons. Keith and Seabrook have been the top defensive players over that span and they havent been good since 2016. His best players to work with have been ****ing gustafsson and Murphy. Doesnt look like its getting better any time soon unless McCabe and Jones are just trying to hustle everyone.


Quoting: SociallyHawkward
Colliton first please. How many seasons can the hawks have a bottom 5 defense before they fire this guy


Let me clarify. I dont like Colliton either. A good coach could have at least salvaged something to work with through Kane. He hasnt. But its not like hes wasted a good roster any of the years
14 oct. 2021 à 1 h 34
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,770
Mentions "j'aime": 2,619
Quoting: SlickWilly
Let me clarify. I dont like Colliton either. A good coach could have at least salvaged something to work with through Kane. He hasnt. But its not like hes wasted a good roster any of the years


There were CBJ fans saying that Seth Jones just wasn't looking good especially last season and well... trading for him didn't improve the D either.

I still don't understand that trade.
SlickWilly et Pensfan89 a aimé ceci.
14 oct. 2021 à 2 h 9
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,990
Mentions "j'aime": 9,300
Quoting: SlickWilly
Yeah him and McCabe are lookin like bad investments. If you need me I'll be rooting for Trevor Zegras until Bowman is fired


McCabe is not a bad investment. Jones is obviously a big overpay both in trade value and the extension.
Pensfan89 a aimé ceci.
14 oct. 2021 à 8 h 45
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 2,400
Mentions "j'aime": 866
I'd like to say I sympathize with you. But I can't, since we haven't even seen what Boqvist and Bean will bring to the table.
But at least the Jones' brothers are now playing together.
14 oct. 2021 à 11 h 3
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,222
Mentions "j'aime": 2,162
Quoting: ChiHawk
McCabe is not a bad investment. Jones is obviously a big overpay both in trade value and the extension.


McCabe underperformed last game as well. I think he'll rebound, but every pass he made was at the guys skates. 4 Mil for a season or two is fine, but the back 2 years of the contract might suck, especially once we have to pay Dach, Debrincats next contract, Kubalik, etc.
14 oct. 2021 à 13 h 16
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,990
Mentions "j'aime": 9,300
Quoting: SlickWilly
McCabe underperformed last game as well. I think he'll rebound, but every pass he made was at the guys skates. 4 Mil for a season or two is fine, but the back 2 years of the contract might suck, especially once we have to pay Dach, Debrincats next contract, Kubalik, etc.


He's better then De Haan and better then our younger guys although Stillman played pretty good last night. Much rather have him in our lineup outside over anyone not named Murphy and Jones (bad last night though).
SlickWilly a aimé ceci.
14 oct. 2021 à 13 h 31
#13
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,831
Mentions "j'aime": 5,799
Quoting: ChiHawk
He's better then De Haan and better then our younger guys although Stillman played pretty good last night. Much rather have him in our lineup outside over anyone not named Murphy and Jones (bad last night though).


I thought a lot of hawks passes were suspect last night. I think because they weren’t mentally ready for the game. In any case, McCabe will be fine going forward.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
14 oct. 2021 à 14 h 20
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,222
Mentions "j'aime": 2,162
Quoting: ChiHawk
He's better then De Haan and better then our younger guys although Stillman played pretty good last night. Much rather have him in our lineup outside over anyone not named Murphy and Jones (bad last night though).


Im not saying hes bad. Im just saying theres a decent chance in 2 or 3 years the term bites us in the ass. Also thought Mitchell was probably our best defenseman last night. The only one who could complete a pass more than 5 feet.
14 oct. 2021 à 14 h 31
#15
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,831
Mentions "j'aime": 5,799
Quoting: SlickWilly
Im not saying hes bad. Im just saying theres a decent chance in 2 or 3 years the term bites us in the ass. Also thought Mitchell was probably our best defenseman last night. The only one who could complete a pass more than 5 feet.


Mitchell only played 8 minutes, but he had a nice assist on the PPG. I think McCabe will be fine, but you can have your suspicions about that contract. Personally I’m more worried about the D-man who is getting paid 9.5 million a year for the next 9 years to be a below replacement level player.
SlickWilly, ChiHawk et Pensfan89 a aimé ceci.
14 oct. 2021 à 15 h 12
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,222
Mentions "j'aime": 2,162
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Mitchell only played 8 minutes, but he had a nice assist on the PPG. I think McCabe will be fine, but you can have your suspicions about that contract. Personally I’m more worried about the D-man who is getting paid 9.5 million a year for the next 9 years to be a below replacement level player.


yeah I think most of us on here agree about that one so we dont have to go too far in depth there
16 oct. 2021 à 21 h 0
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
That Jones contract is gonna bite the Hawks in the coming years. He isn’t worth that contract or the amount the Hawks paid for him.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage