It’s all a beauty contest but no way I’m taking Marner over Pasta, Stone and Rantanen.
How? Marner is as good offensively as pasta and Rantanen and much better defensively and stone is better defensively than Marner but Marner is way better offensively…
Subban has a Norris, doesn’t make him a top d man in the nhl.
Burns has a Norris doesn’t make him a top d man in the nhl.
Gio has a Norris doesn’t make him a top d man in the nhl.
Should I continue?
How? Marner is as good offensively as pasta and Rantanen and much better defensively and stone is better defensively than Marner but Marner is way better offensively…
First and foremost is clutch performance all 3 of those guys have performed at a significantly higher rate in the playoffs. But like I said it’s a beauty contest I’m not going to begrudge anybody’s opinion.
Subban has a Norris, doesn’t make him a top d man in the nhl.
Burns has a Norris doesn’t make him a top d man in the nhl.
Gio has a Norris doesn’t make him a top d man in the nhl.
Should I continue?
Lemme rephrase, his norris trophy which he won 2 months ago says hi. Every statistic and underlying number puts fox in top 5 best defenseman in the league, not to mention when u watch the guy, he is really good. I'm sorry but I respectfully disagree with your opinion that he is overrated.