SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hate

Créé par: justaBoss
Équipe: 2021-22 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 11 oct. 2021
Publié: 11 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
OTT
  1. Mangiapane, Andrew
  2. Poirier, Jérémie
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
SERIES OF CONDITIONAL PICKS

- 2022 1st is Top10 protected. Turns to unprotected 2023 1st if CGY falls to the bottom 10 in 2021-22.

- 2023 2nd gets added if CGY reaches the second round of playoffs either in 2021-22 or 2022-23 seasons.

- 2024 2nd gets added if Brady Tkachuk plays over 200 games in CGY or scored over 175 points until the end of 2023-24 season.
CGY
  1. Tkachuk, Brady [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
CONDITIONAL PICK

- CGY receives the highest of OTT's 2022 3rd round picks if Mangiapane scores over 35 points in 2021-22 season. Pick converts to the OTT's highest 2022 2nd round pick if Mangiapane scores over 50 points in 2021-22 season.
2.
3.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de BOS
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYI
Logo de SJS
2023
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de NSH
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $55 978 833 $0 $4 507 500 $25 521 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
749 250 $749 250 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
747 500 $747 500 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance450 000 $$450K)
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
787 500 $787 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 oct. 2021 à 11 h 14
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,650
Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
Boston declines
11 oct. 2021 à 11 h 15
#2
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
Quoting: Gofnut999
Boston declines


Sure, but why
11 oct. 2021 à 11 h 16
#3
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,612
Mentions "j'aime": 4,383
That's a light return on Brady.

Boston declines.

Zaitsev declines if Anaheim is on his No-Trade list.
11 oct. 2021 à 11 h 16
#4
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,211
Mentions "j'aime": 10,557
Flames can't afford that under the cap. Plus I don't see Flames trading Mangiapane
11 oct. 2021 à 11 h 19
#5
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
Quoting: sensonfire
That's a light return on Brady.

Boston declines.

Zaitsev declines if Anaheim is on his No-Trade list.


Depends how high you rate Mangiapane. Imo he's fairly solid.

Technically the Zaitsev point applies to Henrique. He also has a NTC, but I'm assuming here both are willing to waive to get a new start.

BOS is relatively weak on centers imo. White would give them some depth on that department.
11 oct. 2021 à 11 h 20
#6
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
Quoting: Gmonwy
Flames can't afford that under the cap. Plus I don't see Flames trading Mangiapane


OTT has the cap space, any fairly short term bad contract can be added here to make the money work.
11 oct. 2021 à 11 h 32
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 1,668
Mentions "j'aime": 772
I could be into this Brady trade, however, ideally, I think you do it for a right shot RW and have Formenton on the top line. The 1st should also not be protected, that adds value.

Henrique is a waste of a roster spot that Pinto really has already earned, and Del Zotto is a tire fire and needs to be gone or buried.

Debrusk could mix in well with Paul, but again way too many Left shot forwards already, and Formenton doesn't play the off-wing well.
justaBoss a aimé ceci.
11 oct. 2021 à 12 h 8
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 1,047
Mentions "j'aime": 325
Quoting: justaBoss
Sure, but why


4 years at 4.75M

Quoting: justaBoss
Depends how high you rate Mangiapane. Imo he's fairly solid.

Technically the Zaitsev point applies to Henrique. He also has a NTC, but I'm assuming here both are willing to waive to get a new start.

BOS is relatively weak on centers imo. White would give them some depth on that department.


Studnicka is ready and gives them depth at a fraction of the cost.
11 oct. 2021 à 12 h 9
#9
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
Quoting: BruinsCharlies
4 years at 4.75M



Studnicka is ready and gives them depth at a fraction of the cost.


Would you take if there was a retention in place, or if OTT agreed to take a meh contract off your hands, say Wagner's who was put to waivers.
11 oct. 2021 à 12 h 52
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 1,047
Mentions "j'aime": 325
Quoting: justaBoss
Would you take if there was a retention in place, or if OTT agreed to take a meh contract off your hands, say Wagner's who was put to waivers.


Sorry, not a chance. McAvoy has to get paid and then it is Pastrnak's turn.
11 oct. 2021 à 13 h 21
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,457
Mentions "j'aime": 3,700
Interesting proposals

I'd like less conditions on picks though
justaBoss a aimé ceci.
11 oct. 2021 à 13 h 39
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 2,088
Mentions "j'aime": 686
Flames very easily decline, mangipane is better than Brady tkachuk
11 oct. 2021 à 13 h 55
#13
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
Quoting: flamesfan
Flames very easily decline, mangipane is better than Brady tkachuk


Lmao
Gofnut999 et TheBoyDuddus a aimé ceci.
11 oct. 2021 à 14 h 24
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,650
Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
Modifié 11 oct. 2021 à 14 h 55
Quoting: justaBoss
Sure, but why


Quoting: justaBoss


BOS is relatively weak on centers imo. White would give them some depth on that department.



Not a fan of White’s contract compared to his production. He’s a 3rd liner on a top 15 team. Injury does not help.

That will depend on Coyle and Studnicka this year. I think they will be fine. Defense is more of a problem for me.

I think Debrusk bounces back as well. Though by seasons end i don’t think he will be a 5 mil player leaving them with a dilemma.

There are plenty of Debrusk to OTT possibilities, White should not be one of them.
justaBoss a aimé ceci.
11 oct. 2021 à 16 h 13
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 2,088
Mentions "j'aime": 686
Quoting: justaBoss
Lmao


Mangiapane is miles better defensively and had 4 less points while not playing top pp or top line. Also won’t have to be paid 9 mil on his next contract
11 oct. 2021 à 20 h 26
#16
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
Quoting: flamesfan
Mangiapane is miles better defensively and had 4 less points while not playing top pp or top line. Also won’t have to be paid 9 mil on his next contract


Mangiapane is solid defensively, but the difference between these guys is still remarkable, to the point where offensive stats get taken into account, Tkachuk's weakest season by far is still better than Mangiapane's strongest.

Also the guy is not costing $9M, as he's after a shorter contract reportedly, which would naturally effect the money he's getting.
Gofnut999 a aimé ceci.
11 oct. 2021 à 22 h 34
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,650
Mentions "j'aime": 8,773
Quoting: flamesfan
Flames very easily decline, Mangiapane is better than Brady tkachuk


If you truly believe that, seek professional help.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage