Let me begin, using talent as the sole criteria this is a decent offer.
Let's be clear Grzelcyk is a fine LHD, he does not add any value to Buffalo as even the staunchest Bruin fan recognizes Buffalo has many LHD options.
Yes, he would be the second pairing for Buffalo, but Buffalo wants to be bad this year, and he would reduce the likelihood that Buffalo would be guaranteed a top 3 draft pick.
Asking for $2,500,000 for five years will kill nearly any offer.
Two years of Ladd's $5,500,000 contract cost the Islanders 2 seconds and a third.
Simple math indicates five years of $5,000,000 would be five seconds and 2 thirds.
One year of Marleau's $6,000,000 cost the Leaf's a first.
$20,000,000 retention has value, a conservative estimate is at least a first for each $10,000,000.
Any
REASONABLE individual would know that the draft picks are just a little more than the value of the retention.
Let's remove the retention. Instead add a couple players from Boston who are not playing up to their contracts, DeBrusk and Moore.
Vaakanainen and Frederic are not the sort of prospects that are needed by Buffalo, LHD and a bottom 6 forward.
Replace them with Lysell (Buffalo could use another RW prospect).
Take out the 2023 2nd.
I think the deal is closer.
Two underperforming players added for cap reasons.
Two first and a second.
Decent RW prospect
If DeBrusk can make a comeback, Buffalo wins the trade, if last year is his standard, Boston wins the trade.
Quoting: CFMan
Not close on Eichel...
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
If you take away the draft position hype, not sure he’s playing behind dahlin…I agree, see above why he does not fit the Buffalo roster at this time
Quoting: hanson493
2 1sts, 2 2nds a really good roster player guarantee thats more than buffalo gets back irl. Not with that much retention!
Quoting: Riley816
2.5 mil retention is costly. VERY costly!
Quoting: Dekes
behind dahlin sure... I agree but Grzelcyk makes the Sabres better this year, that is not the plan.
EDIT:
Let me add, this trade is replacing DeBrusk and some futures with Eichel.
IMO it is better for Boston than the one proposed.