SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Cup Contenders

Créé par: JonahHockey99
Équipe: 2021-22 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 8 oct. 2021
Publié: 8 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
2.
BOS
  1. Eichel, Jack (2 500 000 $ retained)
BUF
  1. Frederic, Trent
  2. Grzelcyk, Matt
  3. Vaakanainen, Urho
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
  6. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
  7. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de TOR
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $81 142 341 $1 956 507 $182 500 $357 659 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
AG, C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 375 000 $2 375 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance125 000 $$125K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 oct. 2021 à 13 h 32
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 241
Mentions "j'aime": 92
pls tell me what you are smoking so I can get some smile
Garak et Shibbal18 a aimé ceci.
8 oct. 2021 à 13 h 48
#2
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,217
Mentions "j'aime": 9,022
Boston themselves think Vaakanainen is a bust and he fills no need for Buffalo, the other 2 are depth players at best. This isnt close
8 oct. 2021 à 13 h 57
#3
Number 1 Kahun Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 1,601
Mentions "j'aime": 1,022
Not close on Eichel. And pretty sure Reilly is more important to the Bs than John Moore, not that CHI is interested in the slightest in Moore.
8 oct. 2021 à 15 h 25
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,500
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: Shibbal18
Boston themselves think Vaakanainen is a bust and he fills no need for Buffalo, the other 2 are depth players at best. This isnt close


Grz is not a depth player lol
8 oct. 2021 à 15 h 33
#5
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,217
Mentions "j'aime": 9,022
Quoting: ON3M4N
Grz is not a depth player lol


he is when hes behind Dahlin and Power and Samuelsson and etc
8 oct. 2021 à 16 h 16
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Shibbal18
he is when hes behind Dahlin and Power and Samuelsson and etc


If you take away the draft position hype, not sure he’s playing behind dahlin….samuelsson? Are you kidding me?
8 oct. 2021 à 16 h 20
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,617
Mentions "j'aime": 2,763
2 1sts, 2 2nds a really good roster player guarantee thats more than buffalo gets back irl.
8 oct. 2021 à 16 h 44
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 5,062
Mentions "j'aime": 2,008
Quoting: hanson493
2 1sts, 2 2nds a really good roster player guarantee thats more than buffalo gets back irl.


2.5 mil retention is costly.
8 oct. 2021 à 18 h 4
#9
Dekesaladekes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,890
Mentions "j'aime": 1,049
Quoting: Shibbal18
he is when hes behind Dahlin and Power and Samuelsson and etc


behind dahlin sure that's just because he is their franchise player as for power he won't be playing top line minutes for atleast 2 years this yea he's at michigan and the transition from college to nhl ain't easy and then for samuelsson same thing he played decenlty but still not even close to ready for top line minutes. grzz would be your 2nd best dman next year
8 oct. 2021 à 19 h 22
#10
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,217
Mentions "j'aime": 9,022
Quoting: Dekes
behind dahlin sure that's just because he is their franchise player as for power he won't be playing top line minutes for atleast 2 years this yea he's at michigan and the transition from college to nhl ain't easy and then for samuelsson same thing he played decenlty but still not even close to ready for top line minutes. grzz would be your 2nd best dman next year


Both will be in the NHL next year and they arent trading Eichel for a stop gap dman in a year where they are tanking, whether its 1 or 2 years
8 oct. 2021 à 19 h 29
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,500
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: Shibbal18
he is when hes behind Dahlin and Power and Samuelsson and etc


Last season Grz at 5v5 was...

CF% - 60.3
SF% - 63.8
GF% - 69.9
xGF% - 60.9
SCF% - 59.8

That's one hell if a depth player laugh
8 oct. 2021 à 20 h 42
#12
Bedard23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 9,294
Mentions "j'aime": 4,476
I wouldn’t mind Mike Rielly on the team but we’d need to send cap back because we’d go over the cap if not
9 oct. 2021 à 9 h 18
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 4,799
Let me begin, using talent as the sole criteria this is a decent offer.
Let's be clear Grzelcyk is a fine LHD, he does not add any value to Buffalo as even the staunchest Bruin fan recognizes Buffalo has many LHD options.
Yes, he would be the second pairing for Buffalo, but Buffalo wants to be bad this year, and he would reduce the likelihood that Buffalo would be guaranteed a top 3 draft pick.

Asking for $2,500,000 for five years will kill nearly any offer.
Two years of Ladd's $5,500,000 contract cost the Islanders 2 seconds and a third.
Simple math indicates five years of $5,000,000 would be five seconds and 2 thirds.
One year of Marleau's $6,000,000 cost the Leaf's a first.
$20,000,000 retention has value, a conservative estimate is at least a first for each $10,000,000.
Any REASONABLE individual would know that the draft picks are just a little more than the value of the retention.
Let's remove the retention. Instead add a couple players from Boston who are not playing up to their contracts, DeBrusk and Moore.

Vaakanainen and Frederic are not the sort of prospects that are needed by Buffalo, LHD and a bottom 6 forward.
Replace them with Lysell (Buffalo could use another RW prospect).
Take out the 2023 2nd.
I think the deal is closer.

Two underperforming players added for cap reasons.
Two first and a second.
Decent RW prospect
If DeBrusk can make a comeback, Buffalo wins the trade, if last year is his standard, Boston wins the trade.

Quoting: CFMan
Not close on Eichel...
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
If you take away the draft position hype, not sure he’s playing behind dahlin…I agree, see above why he does not fit the Buffalo roster at this time
Quoting: hanson493
2 1sts, 2 2nds a really good roster player guarantee thats more than buffalo gets back irl. Not with that much retention!
Quoting: Riley816
2.5 mil retention is costly. VERY costly!
Quoting: Dekes
behind dahlin sure... I agree but Grzelcyk makes the Sabres better this year, that is not the plan.


EDIT:
Let me add, this trade is replacing DeBrusk and some futures with Eichel.
IMO it is better for Boston than the one proposed.
GMTD et Bostonbruins a aimé ceci.
9 oct. 2021 à 9 h 31
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
Let me begin, using talent as the sole criteria this is a decent offer.
Let's be clear Grzelcyk is a fine LHD, he does not add any value to Buffalo as even the staunchest Bruin fan recognizes Buffalo has many LHD options.
Yes, he would be the second pairing for Buffalo, but Buffalo wants to be bad this year, and he would reduce the likelihood that Buffalo would be guaranteed a top 3 draft pick.

Asking for $2,500,000 for five years will kill nearly any offer.
Two years of Ladd's $5,500,000 contract cost the Islanders 2 seconds and a third.
Simple math indicates five years of $5,000,000 would be five seconds and 2 thirds.
One year of Marleau's $6,000,000 cost the Leaf's a first.
$20,000,000 retention has value, a conservative estimate is at least a first for each $10,000,000.
Any REASONABLE individual would know that the draft picks are just a little more than the value of the retention.
Let's remove the retention. Instead add a couple players from Boston who are not playing up to their contracts, DeBrusk and Moore.

Vaakanainen and Frederic are not the sort of prospects that are needed by Buffalo, LHD and a bottom 6 forward.
Replace them with Lysell (Buffalo could use another RW prospect).
Take out the 2023 2nd.
I think the deal is closer.

Two underperforming players added for cap reasons.
Two first and a second.
Decent RW prospect
If DeBrusk can make a comeback, Buffalo wins the trade, if last year is his standard, Boston wins the trade.



EDIT:
Let me add, this trade is replacing DeBrusk and some futures with Eichel.
IMO it is better for Boston than the one proposed.


Grzelcyk would be buffalos best LD, and very easily flippable.
9 oct. 2021 à 10 h 49
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 4,799
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Grzelcyk would be buffalos best LD, and very easily flippable.
Did you happen to miss this: If you take away the draft position hype, not sure he’s playing behind dahlin…I agree, see above why he does not fit the Buffalo roster at this time
Exactly how is that different than this comment?
Did you happen to read why, he does not fit at this time?
Did you READ any of my comment?
Did you think I was disagreeing with you?
What part of my comment would give you the impression that I did disagree with you?
Just to be clear, in case you did not understand this comment, I am being snarky!
What could be more clear than I agree?
GMTD et Bostonbruins a aimé ceci.
9 oct. 2021 à 12 h 38
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
Did you happen to miss this: If you take away the draft position hype, not sure he’s playing behind dahlin…I agree, see above why he does not fit the Buffalo roster at this time
Exactly how is that different than this comment?
Did you happen to read why, he does not fit at this time?
Did you READ any of my comment?
Did you think I was disagreeing with you?
What part of my comment would give you the impression that I did disagree with you?
Just to be clear, in case you did not understand this comment, I am being snarky!
What could be more clear than I agree?


Did you read mine? He’s easily flippable. You said he provides no value to buffalo. That’s stupid.
9 oct. 2021 à 13 h 39
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 4,799
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Did you read mine? He’s easily flippable. You said he provides no value to buffalo. That’s stupid.
Great, he adds value which is exactly what the Sabre do not want.
Why are so myopic.
He would make the Sabres better which is the exact opposite of the plan.
I agreed with your statements, your reply was obtuse and irrelevant as you were defending your point that he is valuable to which I agreed.
Let me close, as you are also commenting on a different Bruins trade if Carlo ("They’re not going to get a more valuable piece than carlo. That’s how.") and Grzelcyk are so valuable, why did the Bruins not win the cup.
Hall, Pasternak, Bergeron, Marchand, McAvoy, Krejci, as the stars and a great supporting cast of Carlo and Grzelcyk et al they must have at gone to the finals.
No, you say they lost to the Islanders, for shame.
You are such a homer,
You even pick a fight with some one agreed with you, why not just say the truth.
Buffalo does not want players who will make this team better, they want picks and prospects.
Carlo and Grzelcyk make the Sabres better, so therefore they have no value on this team.
GMTD et Bostonbruins a aimé ceci.
9 oct. 2021 à 13 h 44
#18
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
Great, he adds value which is exactly what the Sabre do not want.
Why are so myopic.
He would make the Sabres better which is the exact opposite of the plan.
I agreed with your statements, your reply was obtuse and irrelevant as you were defending your point that he is valuable to which I agreed.
Let me close, as you are also commenting on a different Bruins trade if Carlo ("They’re not going to get a more valuable piece than carlo. That’s how.") and Grzelcyk are so valuable, why did the Bruins not win the cup.
Hall, Pasternak, Bergeron, Marchand, McAvoy, Krejci, as the stars and a great supporting cast of Carlo and Grzelcyk et al they must have at gone to the finals.
No, you say they lost to the Islanders, for shame.
You are such a homer,
You even pick a fight with some one agreed with you, why not just say the truth.
Buffalo does not want players who will make this team better, they want picks and prospects.
Carlo and Grzelcyk make the Sabres better, so therefore they have no value on this team.


So do you just not understand what “flippable,” means?

I think you’ve gotta figure out that the four firsts picks aren’t coming.

No need to lash out again. Settle down little guy.
9 oct. 2021 à 18 h 40
#19
Dekesaladekes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,890
Mentions "j'aime": 1,049
Quoting: Shibbal18
Both will be in the NHL next year and they arent trading Eichel for a stop gap dman in a year where they are tanking, whether its 1 or 2 years


power will play at most like 15 games he commited to returning back to michigan for the year
9 oct. 2021 à 19 h 23
#20
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Dekes
power will play at most like 15 games he commited to returning back to michigan for the year


It will be outright hilarious if power just plays out his eligibility at michigan and goes UFA.
Dekes a aimé ceci.
9 oct. 2021 à 20 h 52
#21
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,217
Mentions "j'aime": 9,022
Quoting: Dekes
power will play at most like 15 games he commited to returning back to michigan for the year


? Next year
10 oct. 2021 à 17 h 39
#22
Dekesaladekes
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,890
Mentions "j'aime": 1,049
Quoting: Shibbal18
? Next year


for this 2021-22 season power has committed to play at michigan he will not be playing for buffalo till college hockey is done
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
10 oct. 2021 à 19 h 44
#23
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,217
Mentions "j'aime": 9,022
Quoting: Dekes
for this 2021-22 season power has committed to play at michigan he will not be playing for buffalo till college hockey is done


Right, thats this season, now. I said next season as in 22-23
12 oct. 2021 à 8 h 20
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,617
Mentions "j'aime": 2,763
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
Let me begin, using talent as the sole criteria this is a decent offer.
Let's be clear Grzelcyk is a fine LHD, he does not add any value to Buffalo as even the staunchest Bruin fan recognizes Buffalo has many LHD options.
Yes, he would be the second pairing for Buffalo, but Buffalo wants to be bad this year, and he would reduce the likelihood that Buffalo would be guaranteed a top 3 draft pick.

Asking for $2,500,000 for five years will kill nearly any offer.
Two years of Ladd's $5,500,000 contract cost the Islanders 2 seconds and a third.
Simple math indicates five years of $5,000,000 would be five seconds and 2 thirds.
One year of Marleau's $6,000,000 cost the Leaf's a first.
$20,000,000 retention has value, a conservative estimate is at least a first for each $10,000,000.
Any REASONABLE individual would know that the draft picks are just a little more than the value of the retention.
Let's remove the retention. Instead add a couple players from Boston who are not playing up to their contracts, DeBrusk and Moore.

Vaakanainen and Frederic are not the sort of prospects that are needed by Buffalo, LHD and a bottom 6 forward.
Replace them with Lysell (Buffalo could use another RW prospect).
Take out the 2023 2nd.
I think the deal is closer.

Two underperforming players added for cap reasons.
Two first and a second.
Decent RW prospect
If DeBrusk can make a comeback, Buffalo wins the trade, if last year is his standard, Boston wins the trade.



EDIT:
Let me add, this trade is replacing DeBrusk and some futures with Eichel.
IMO it is better for Boston than the one proposed.


Quoting: Riley816
2.5 mil retention is costly.


Eichel also has a broken neck and may never be the same player with either surgery 10m is alot to take on not knowing wtf you are getting for a player in return, you could be getting the superstar at 25 years old still, you could be getting a guy whos ltiretired for the rest of his career and cant play hockey again. im assuming these picks are straight up but ide imagine any sort of eichel deal for any team has conditional 1sts that become way lesser picks if he doesnt hit GP or Point thresholds after surgery. I really dont see many teams offering more than 2 firsts 2 seconds and a roster player. regardless of retention or whatnot. Im sure they can make the cap work for a deal using any plethora of guys.

idc if buffalo goes 0-82 grz is still a valuable piece in any deal. hes a better dman all around than colin miller and buffalo gave up a 2nd and a 5th for him iirc. For those that are down on vaak and freddy. Freddy is a high intensity grit 4th liner atm might become a 3rd if he develops but probably only a 4th liner, that being said hes still an nhl player at 23 yo, not like this is what he is for the rest of his career. Vaak looked great until his concussion a few years ago, some guys take longer to recover, hes taking a bit longer to get his groove back. Hes only 22 and still believe he has high enough upside there.
12 oct. 2021 à 8 h 55
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 4,799
Quoting: hanson493
Eichel also has a broken neck and may never be the same player with either surgery 10m is alot to take on not knowing wtf you are getting for a player in return, you could be getting the superstar at 25 years old still, you could be getting a guy whos ltiretired for the rest of his career and cant play hockey again. im assuming these picks are straight up but ide imagine any sort of eichel deal for any team has conditional 1sts that become way lesser picks if he doesnt hit GP or Point thresholds after surgery. I really dont see many teams offering more than 2 firsts 2 seconds and a roster player. regardless of retention or whatnot. Im sure they can make the cap work for a deal using any plethora of guys. Let' s be clear Jack does not have a broken neck.
Second, my objection to the trade is retaining $2,500,000.
I gave several examples of the cost of retention, did you happen to over look those?
Then I gave a reasonable offer without the retention. It would be nice if you responded to that.
idc if buffalo goes 0-82 grz is still a valuable piece in any deal. hes a better dman all around than colin miller and buffalo gave up a 2nd and a 5th for him iirc. For those that are down on vaak and freddy. Freddy is a high intensity grit 4th liner atm might become a 3rd if he develops but probably only a 4th liner, that being said hes still an nhl player at 23 yo, not like this is what he is for the rest of his career. Vaak looked great until his concussion a few years ago, some guys take longer to recover, hes taking a bit longer to get his groove back. Hes only 22 and still believe he has high enough upside there. First I completely agree that Grzelcyk is the center piece. I wonder if you actually saw that, for you to start your comment about him.
Second, 4th line players are added to the line for free by signing UFA's, Frederic is not a valuable addition to the trade.
So Vaakanainen is damaged goods? So let's not add any conditions and Buffalo will take the chance that he is good and Boston takes the risk that Jack will be the same.
Jack returning to full capabilities is more likely than Vaakanainen being a top 6 player.

I guess you did not notice that I objected to the retention and what that much retention will cost.
Nor did you notice the I agreed that Grzelcyk is a valuable asset.
I wonder why you chose to ignore my alternative trade, I am responding to your comment, you are obviously not responding to mine.
Bostonbruins et GMTD a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage