SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kerfoot to Vegas

Créé par: HollywoodHudon
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 7 oct. 2021
Publié: 7 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2023 (VGK)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $79 508 116 $0 $400 000 $1 991 884 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 oct. 2021 à 17 h 9
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,914
Mentions "j'aime": 19,289
Toronto's not trading their only middle 6 caliber player and Vegas cant afford him when Tuch is healthy by Christmas
7 oct. 2021 à 17 h 11
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 370
Mentions "j'aime": 202
As a Leafs fan, I would be concerned if we trade Kerfoot.

To me, Kerfoot is an insurance policy in the #2 center spot if something were to happen to Matthews or Tavares.

Without Kerfoot, our #2 center if our stars got injured would be Kampf and I would not be okay with that.
Barilko14 a aimé ceci.
7 oct. 2021 à 17 h 33
#3
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: Janasazi
As a Leafs fan, I would be concerned if we trade Kerfoot.

To me, Kerfoot is an insurance policy in the #2 center spot if something were to happen to Matthews or Tavares.

Without Kerfoot, our #2 center if our stars got injured would be Kampf and I would not be okay with that.


You telling me a Nylander couldn’t play C? A top 4 of:
Ritchie Matthews Marner
Bunting Nylander Kase
That couldn’t work, please. Keeping Kerfoot and his 3.5 mil AAV just in case an injury happens is stupid. The fact is he has been here for 2 years and the Leafs still don’t know what he is, a C or LW. Even more so if they plan on using him on the 4th line.
The fact he hasn’t been able to solidify his role on this roster makes him expendable
tmlfan93 a aimé ceci.
7 oct. 2021 à 17 h 42
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 370
Mentions "j'aime": 202
Quoting: MatthewsFan
You telling me a Nylander couldn’t play C? A top 4 of:
Ritchie Matthews Marner
Bunting Nylander Kase
That couldn’t work, please. Keeping Kerfoot and his 3.5 mil AAV just in case an injury happens is stupid. The fact is he has been here for 2 years and the Leafs still don’t know what he is, a C or LW. Even more so if they plan on using him on the 4th line.
The fact he hasn’t been able to solidify his role on this roster makes him expendable


I'm with you in that Kerfoot is overpaid and he is expendable (I wanted McCann to stay in Toronto and Kerfoot to be taken) but he is what we have as a viable 3C that could do 2C minutes if called on.

Nylander can play center but we haven't seen how he does in that position.

Plus there is also question marks around Kase's health through an 82 game season given his injury history.

A Bunting-Nylander-Kase second line would be good in theory but we don't know if that works in practice.

In the playoffs we at least had a decent 2nd line with Kerfoot and Nylander playing together.

If we traded Kerfoot and got a less expensive center in return, now we're having a different conversation.
7 oct. 2021 à 17 h 49
#5
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: Janasazi
I'm with you in that Kerfoot is overpaid and he is expendable (I wanted McCann to stay in Toronto and Kerfoot to be taken) but he is what we have as a viable 3C that could do 2C minutes if called on.

Nylander can play center but we haven't seen how he does in that position.

Plus there is also question marks around Kase's health through an 82 game season given his injury history.

A Bunting-Nylander-Kase second line would be good in theory but we don't know if that works in practice.

In the playoffs we at least had a decent 2nd line with Kerfoot and Nylander playing together.

If we traded Kerfoot and got a less expensive center in return, now we're having a different conversation.


But Kerfoot isn’t a C. He is terrible at faceoff’s, cant drive a line, is ok defensively, but not a shutdown C. Sure, he looks good on the LW beside Nylander and Tavares, and if the Leafs play him in the top 6 at LW, fine. But he is wasted cap space in the bottom six.

If Kase gets injured then call up Robertson, or sign Ho-Sang and call him up.

I really liked playoff Kerfoot but that was for like 7 games. He is missed cast on this team and overpaid for what he brings. On a cap team, he is expendable.

But agree to disagree all good.
gmurrayt a aimé ceci.
7 oct. 2021 à 18 h 13
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 370
Mentions "j'aime": 202
Quoting: MatthewsFan
But Kerfoot isn’t a C. He is terrible at faceoff’s, cant drive a line, is ok defensively, but not a shutdown C. Sure, he looks good on the LW beside Nylander and Tavares, and if the Leafs play him in the top 6 at LW, fine. But he is wasted cap space in the bottom six.

If Kase gets injured then call up Robertson, or sign Ho-Sang and call him up.

I really liked playoff Kerfoot but that was for like 7 games. He is missed cast on this team and overpaid for what he brings. On a cap team, he is expendable.

But agree to disagree all good.


It's definitely a debate that can be had, there ain't no animosity here.

If we take out Kerfoot and his cap hit and remove Engvall we could even potentially find something that can fix the problem.

In my opinion though, Kerfoot for just a bunch of picks just leaves us hoping for the good health of Matthews and Tavares.
7 oct. 2021 à 18 h 21
#7
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: Janasazi
It's definitely a debate that can be had, there ain't no animosity here.

If we take out Kerfoot and his cap hit and remove Engvall we could even potentially find something that can fix the problem.

In my opinion though, Kerfoot for just a bunch of picks just leaves us hoping for the good health of Matthews and Tavares.


I think a very strong lineup could be:
Ritchie Matthews Marner
Nylander Tavares Kase
Engvall Kampf Mikheyev
Bunting Brooks Spezza
Rielly Brodie
Muzzin Holl
Sandin Dermott

Liljegren
Simmonds
Semyonov
7 oct. 2021 à 18 h 21
#8
Marner rocks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 3,878
Mentions "j'aime": 869
Quoting: Janasazi
I'm with you in that Kerfoot is overpaid and he is expendable (I wanted McCann to stay in Toronto and Kerfoot to be taken) but he is what we have as a viable 3C that could do 2C minutes if called on.

Nylander can play center but we haven't seen how he does in that position.

Plus there is also question marks around Kase's health through an 82 game season given his injury history.

A Bunting-Nylander-Kase second line would be good in theory but we don't know if that works in practice.

In the playoffs we at least had a decent 2nd line with Kerfoot and Nylander playing together.

If we traded Kerfoot and got a less expensive center in return, now we're having a different conversation.


Kampf is the leafs 3rd center that's why they got him. Kerfoot has proven he's not capable to play that role. His a winger and good on the pk.
7 oct. 2021 à 18 h 23
#9
Marner rocks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 3,878
Mentions "j'aime": 869
Quoting: MatthewsFan
I think a very strong lineup could be:
Ritchie Matthews Marner
Nylander Tavares Kase
Engvall Kampf Mikheyev
Bunting Brooks Spezza
Rielly Brodie
Muzzin Holl
Sandin Dermott

Liljegren
Simmonds
Semyonov


I'd put Bunting on the 3rd line because he seems to be a finisher. So they tell soupy shoot low and Bunting can clean up afterwards. If Bunting starts putting the puck in off soupy rebounds that might build soupy's confidence. Soupy can skate like the wind and if he starts picking up some points early in the season he could be a big plus on the 3rd line RW
7 oct. 2021 à 18 h 28
#10
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: jaok3
I'd put Bunting on the 3rd line because he seems to be a finisher. So they tell soupy shoot low and Bunting can clean up afterwards.


Well just move the 4th line up then. A shutdown line of Engvall Kampf Mikheyev is very interesting
7 oct. 2021 à 18 h 36
#11
Marner rocks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 3,878
Mentions "j'aime": 869
Quoting: MatthewsFan
Well just move the 4th line up then. A shutdown line of Engvall Kampf Mikheyev is very interesting


The only thing about that line is they had 15 goals combined last season and Bunting had 10 in 21 games. Just think he might be the sparkplug on that line and score some goals as well. I just don't see the effort out of Engvall most nights and for his size he should be banging bodies and he doesn't.
7 oct. 2021 à 18 h 42
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 132
Quoting: jaok3
Kampf is the leafs 3rd center that's why they got him. Kerfoot has proven he's not capable to play that role. His a winger and good on the pk.


Kerfoot is capable of playing third C and he's a good winger. That's a valuable asset for depth. it's not just about creating the right lineup but creating the right what if lineup.
7 oct. 2021 à 18 h 44
#13
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: jaok3
The only thing about that line is they had 15 goals combined last season and Bunting had 10 in 21 games. Just think he might be the sparkplug on that line and score some goals as well. I just don't see the effort out of Engvall most nights and for his size he should be banging bodies and he doesn't.


I think they would be super frustrating to play against.
Engvall (6’5) Kampf (6’2) Mikheyev (6’3)
Will they score a lot, no, but so wouldn’t the other team. They all can skate like the wind, get in on the forecheck, great defensively, ugh I really want to see this line
7 oct. 2021 à 18 h 45
#14
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: Onslaught77
Kerfoot is capable of playing third C and he's a good winger. That's a valuable asset for depth. it's not just about creating the right lineup but creating the right what if lineup.


Well that what if lineup only has 1 player. A fwd or D, that’s not really good
7 oct. 2021 à 19 h 3
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 132
Quoting: MatthewsFan
Well that what if lineup only has 1 player. A fwd or D, that’s not really good


No, they have guys in the minors they can bring up. they need 3rd and 2nd line guys they can move around. They have that. They need to move Dermott but i doubt there is a team that would be willing to take him for pucks never mind pay for him. Fans of other teams feel free to correct me if you think Dermott is a player your team needs bad enough to pay for him.
context: many on here can attest to the fact that I have never been high on Dermott. Other leafs fans are just starting to realize I'm right.
7 oct. 2021 à 19 h 8
#16
Doc
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 96
Mentions "j'aime": 21
In a perfect world the Leafs trade Kerfort and Dermit or Holl with picks to Anaheim for Manson 50% retain. This frees up cap space, makes our defense better and unblocks lilly from a full time NHL spot well having a good partner for both Lilly and Sandman. Muzzin and Lilly, and Sandin and Manson.

I also know that would be a dream that will never come true, but Kerfort, dermit, and Holl have all shown this pre-season they need to be shipped out.
7 oct. 2021 à 19 h 12
#17
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: Onslaught77
No, they have guys in the minors they can bring up. they need 3rd and 2nd line guys they can move around. They have that. They need to move Dermott but i doubt there is a team that would be willing to take him for pucks never mind pay for him. Fans of other teams feel free to correct me if you think Dermott is a player your team needs bad enough to pay for him.
context: many on here can attest to the fact that I have never been high on Dermott. Other leafs fans are just starting to realize I'm right.


So you move Dermott and Rielly or Muzzin get hurt, who is your safety net going to be if you move Dermott. Elevate Sandin, call up Dalhstrom. The options on the backend are not as deep. Kerfoot is 100 percent replaceable with players already on this team. Like, this isn’t a guy who puts up points,
he has a high of 28 points 🤷‍♂️
7 oct. 2021 à 19 h 25
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 132
Quoting: MatthewsFan
So you move Dermott and Rielly or Muzzin get hurt, who is your safety net going to be if you move Dermott. Elevate Sandin, call up Dalhstrom. The options on the backend are not as deep. Kerfoot is 100 percent replaceable with players already on this team. Like, this isn’t a guy who puts up points,
he has a high of 28 points 🤷‍♂️


Preferably the asset you get with his and maybe Engvalls cap space. The problem isn't not having Dermott, It's how to get rid of him and retain the cap space.
7 oct. 2021 à 19 h 27
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 132
Quoting: MatthewsFan
So you move Dermott and Rielly or Muzzin get hurt, who is your safety net going to be if you move Dermott. Elevate Sandin, call up Dalhstrom. The options on the backend are not as deep. Kerfoot is 100 percent replaceable with players already on this team. Like, this isn’t a guy who puts up points,
he has a high of 28 points 🤷‍♂️


Try creating an agm that trades Dermott for anything that doesn't get scoffed at by the team's fans you trade him to. Good luck.
7 oct. 2021 à 19 h 46
#20
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: Onslaught77
Try creating an agm that trades Dermott for anything that doesn't get scoffed at by the team's fans you trade him to. Good luck.


Meh, we are all entitled to our own opinions, if people don’t value Dermott or Kerfoot, that’s whatever. My argument is trading Kerfoot not only allows you to keep your depth but also cap space if they want to add. And they have options within to replace what he brings to the team.

A Dermott trade only weakens the depth on LD and creates one league min roster spot. Biega I guess
7 oct. 2021 à 19 h 55
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 132
Quoting: MatthewsFan
Meh, we are all entitled to our own opinions, if people don’t value Dermott or Kerfoot, that’s whatever. My argument is trading Kerfoot not only allows you to keep your depth but also cap space if they want to add. And they have options within to replace what he brings to the team.

A Dermott trade only weakens the depth on LD and creates one league min roster spot. Biega I guess


Dermott is 1.5m aav
7 oct. 2021 à 20 h 9
#22
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: Onslaught77
Dermott is 1.5m aav


Correct, a Dermott trade alone does nothing, you would still have to waive Engvall.

A Kerfoot trade solves all
7 oct. 2021 à 20 h 18
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 132
Quoting: MatthewsFan
Correct, a Dermott trade alone does nothing, you would still have to waive Engvall.

A Kerfoot trade solves all


Depends on the trade. Kerfoot has a role. That matters. An Ottawa fan suggested Mete for Dermott. That actually would be a really interesting move. Mete is a guy who might actually fill that third line role better than Dermott for the Leafs IMO.
7 oct. 2021 à 20 h 23
#24
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: Onslaught77
Depends on the trade. Kerfoot has a role. That matters. An Ottawa fan suggested Mete for Dermott. That actually would be a really interesting move. Mete is a guy who might actually fill that third line role better than Dermott for the Leafs IMO.


For starters I would love to know what role Kerfoot plays on the Leafs. Seriously.

As for the trade, feel like Dermott has more value than Mete.

https://twitter.com/dylanfremlin/status/1441498747654098944?s=21

He has really good numbers
Barilko14 a aimé ceci.
7 oct. 2021 à 20 h 29
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 703
Mentions "j'aime": 132
Quoting: MatthewsFan
For starters I would love to know what role Kerfoot plays on the Leafs. Seriously.

As for the trade, feel like Dermott has more value than Mete.

https://twitter.com/dylanfremlin/status/1441498747654098944?s=21

He has really good numbers


Kerfoot Is a guy who can play wing quite well and score doing it but also is a serviceable 3rd line center when you need him to be. Dermott is a problem in the role the leafs need him to play and Mete has been able to be that but Dermott's skills might work for Ottawa better and be a wakeup call for him.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage