SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Mid season trades to make run

Créé par: BoltsFan9186
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 7 oct. 2021
Publié: 7 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
STL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $66 081 667 $0 $512 500 $15 418 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
500 000 $500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 oct. 2021 à 0 h 11
#1
STL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,604
Mentions "j'aime": 1,633
Sharks minus Kane making a run?
Radu47 a aimé ceci.
7 oct. 2021 à 0 h 12
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,025
Mentions "j'aime": 3,568
Not a chance the sharks do that. Stop making awful trades for the sharks
7 oct. 2021 à 0 h 37
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Uhhh…

The pick is going the wrong way fam
7 oct. 2021 à 0 h 51
#4
STL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,604
Mentions "j'aime": 1,633
Quoting: FunMustBeAlways
Uhhh…

The pick is going the wrong way fam


Are you suggesting the Blues send Tarasenko to SJ along with a 1st? For nothing?
7 oct. 2021 à 1 h 19
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Quoting: jwg314
Are you suggesting the Blues send Tarasenko to SJ along with a 1st? For nothing?


A first might be too much but he has negative value to us
gary_bettman a aimé ceci.
7 oct. 2021 à 1 h 22
#6
IamAlwaysRight
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 2,681
Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
Quoting: jwg314
Are you suggesting the Blues send Tarasenko to SJ along with a 1st? For nothing?

Tarasenko is not worth a lottery pick. I wouldn't even pay a 2nd for the often injured Tarasenko.
7 oct. 2021 à 1 h 33
#7
Xercuses
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 13,309
Mentions "j'aime": 3,548
Quoting: FunMustBeAlways
A first might be too much but he has negative value to us

?? That’s a funny joke
KrispyBBQ a aimé ceci.
7 oct. 2021 à 1 h 36
#8
STL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,604
Mentions "j'aime": 1,633
Quoting: gary_bettman
Tarasenko is not worth a lottery pick. I wouldn't even pay a 2nd for the often injured Tarasenko.


I'm not defending the original trade proposal. But suggesting the Blues give him to you along with a 1st for nothing is nonsense. I assume OP chose their words poorly.
7 oct. 2021 à 1 h 45
#9
IamAlwaysRight
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 2,681
Mentions "j'aime": 1,321
Quoting: jwg314
I'm not defending the original trade proposal. But suggesting the Blues give him to you along with a 1st for nothing is nonsense. I assume OP chose their words poorly.


i never suggested that. communicate with op for that.
7 oct. 2021 à 2 h 0
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Quoting: xercuses
?? That’s a funny joke


?? its true though
7 oct. 2021 à 2 h 47
#11
Vegan Commie Hipster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 7,888
Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
Janky post on all levels

😣

Rethinking this would be ideal
7 oct. 2021 à 3 h 5
#12
Xercuses
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 13,309
Mentions "j'aime": 3,548
Quoting: FunMustBeAlways
?? its true though


I understand low vaule espeaclly to the sharks but no where near negative
7 oct. 2021 à 5 h 14
#13
The right to Wright
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 867
Mentions "j'aime": 185
A 2nd is the max you should give up for him as we don't want another Ottawa situation where they get a top 5 or even a top 3 pick and can run away with a supertalent that you would really need. Also Blues should retain 2.5m on Tarasenko. Then he will hopefully bounce back to at the very least a 25 goal form and then you trade him at the TD with 2.5m retained for a 1st to a contender. Then it makes sense. Sharks will be a bottom feeder especially without Kane. He might be an awful human being but he is a damn talented man that can score 30 goals and be a 60-65 point player
xercuses a aimé ceci.
7 oct. 2021 à 17 h 9
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 55
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Doug Armstrong doesn't make very many trades that he doesn't clearly win. He certainly isn't going to trade Tarasenko AND a pick to a Western Conference team just to trade him. If he was just going to dump him for zero value he would've done it already this offseason.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage