SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

How deep can they go

Créé par: gpmack95
Équipe: 2022-23 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 2 oct. 2021
Publié: 2 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2875 000 $
2850 000 $
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
66 000 000 $
34 750 000 $
42 950 000 $
2800 000 $
2750 000 $
77 000 000 $
13 500 000 $
22 000 000 $
12 000 000 $
Transactions
COL
  1. Stenlund, Kevin [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. Johnson, Erik
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (COL)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2023
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de CBJ
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2024
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $80 802 500 $25 000 $3 562 500 $697 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 7
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 8
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
908 333 $908 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
850 000 $850 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
G
UFA - 5
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
800 000 $800 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 2
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 oct. 2021 à 15 h 57
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 5,490
Mentions "j'aime": 1,659
Ben Chiarot will get more than 3.5M on is next deal
Xqb15a a aimé ceci.
2 oct. 2021 à 18 h 26
#2
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,997
Mentions "j'aime": 2,843
$7M for Trocheck seems like a ton. I'd say he peaks at $6.25M.
Xqb15a a aimé ceci.
2 oct. 2021 à 19 h 54
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,352
Mentions "j'aime": 9,004
Critique from a practical point.
EJ - they aren’t trading him. Besides being great in the locker room, he can still play when healthy, he’s a great mentor for the young d, and when his contract expires they will basically use it all to re-sign MacKinnon.
Trochek- why? The Avs have Newhook and they WANT and EXPECT him to be the 2C next season if not sooner.
Kuemper - the only way he signs a deal that small is if the Avs flame out in the playoffs, and if they do that they won’t go back to the well regardless the cost to obtain him. A more realistic amount is closer to $6M.
Nichushkin - love Val would love him back but some analytics driven team is going to offer more especially if he has a 40pt+ season playing on the 2nd line where he is pencilled in right now by the Avs.
Sampo Ranta - right now he is pushing hard to make the Avs this year, he is significantly better than Maltsev.
MacDermid - is awful, full stop. Mistake of a trade by Sakic this year.

It’s a creative ACGM just don’t like it that much, though I do like the thought of adding a Pavelski for the bottom 6.
2 oct. 2021 à 21 h 4
#4
Representing the 505
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,485
Mentions "j'aime": 3,677
Quoting: Xqb15a
Critique from a practical point.
EJ - they aren’t trading him. Besides being great in the locker room, he can still play when healthy, he’s a great mentor for the young d, and when his contract expires they will basically use it all to re-sign MacKinnon.
Trochek- why? The Avs have Newhook and they WANT and EXPECT him to be the 2C next season if not sooner.
Kuemper - the only way he signs a deal that small is if the Avs flame out in the playoffs, and if they do that they won’t go back to the well regardless the cost to obtain him. A more realistic amount is closer to $6M.
Nichushkin - love Val would love him back but some analytics driven team is going to offer more especially if he has a 40pt+ season playing on the 2nd line where he is pencilled in right now by the Avs.
Sampo Ranta - right now he is pushing hard to make the Avs this year, he is significantly better than Maltsev.
MacDermid - is awful, full stop. Mistake of a trade by Sakic this year.

It’s a creative ACGM just don’t like it that much, though I do like the thought of adding a Pavelski for the bottom 6.


EJ - agree
Trochek - Agree except we already know what he is while Newhook still has to prove he can be that 2C
Kuemper - Sort of agree but I'm not sure the Avs want to go into yet another off-season with big questions at G; he will want more than $4.75 for sure
Nuke - Even if he does well, he knows what he is; he flamed out in DAL because they wanted him to be more than he was capable of. If he is wise, he won't try to capitalize on what he's done with the Avs because then he'll be expected to put up 40+ points and be an offensive difference-maker. Better for him to stay with the Avs as a defensive specialist who has a limited offensive dimension to his game even if it means leaving some money on the table.
Ranta - Agree; much higher ceiling than MM
MacDermid - It was probably too high a price by Sakic but I'm withholding judgement until we see how he's deployed and if he serves the purpose for which he was acquired
Xqb15a a aimé ceci.
3 oct. 2021 à 11 h 31
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,352
Mentions "j'aime": 9,004
Quoting: NMAvsFan
EJ - agree
Trochek - Agree except we already know what he is while Newhook still has to prove he can be that 2C
Kuemper - Sort of agree but I'm not sure the Avs want to go into yet another off-season with big questions at G; he will want more than $4.75 for sure
Nuke - Even if he does well, he knows what he is; he flamed out in DAL because they wanted him to be more than he was capable of. If he is wise, he won't try to capitalize on what he's done with the Avs because then he'll be expected to put up 40+ points and be an offensive difference-maker. Better for him to stay with the Avs as a defensive specialist who has a limited offensive dimension to his game even if it means leaving some money on the table.
Ranta - Agree; much higher ceiling than MM
MacDermid - It was probably too high a price by Sakic but I'm withholding judgement until we see how he's deployed and if he serves the purpose for which he was acquired


MacDermid just isn’t an NHL player not on a contending team, he can punch people, I mean he has been awful in drills and was awful in the game against MIN.
NMAvsFan a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage